ADVERTISEMENT

Trump 2.0: The most damaging two weeks in history

cigaretteman

HB King
May 29, 2001
79,413
62,520
113
No president in history has caused more damage to the nation more quickly. As we enter Week 3 of President Donald Trump’s second term, the chaos and disruption of his first look quaint by comparison. The country survived Trump 1. Now, it faces a real threat that the harm he inflicts during his second term will be irreparable. The United States’ standing in the world, its ability to keep the country safe, the federal government’s fundamental capacity to operate effectively — all of these will take years to repair, if that can be achieved at all.


Make sense of the latest news and debates with our daily newsletter

This column will concentrate on the third piece of that trifecta: efforts to undermine the basic functioning of government. A unifying theme of much of Trump’s activity since Jan. 20 has been his unrelenting and broadscale assault on the federal workforce. In his first term, Trump railed about what he termed the “deep state” and its seeming ability to frustrate his plans. In his second, he has unleashed a no-holds-barred attack on career employees — one designed to punish those who dared to counter him or his allies; to oust or neuter those with years of expertise; and to set the stage for a new spoils system, replacing seasoned, nonpartisan career workers with compliant Trump loyalists.
“[Trump] is destroying whatever gets in the way of what he wants to do,” Max Stier, the normally mild-mannered president of the Partnership for Public Service, told me. “That includes having loyalty be the primary screen for choosing his direct lieutenants and crushing the civil service and converting it into a tool for his private agenda, as opposed to a force for the public good and the rule of law.”


Contempt for civil servants — sneering at “unelected bureaucrats in Washington, D.C.” — is not unique to the Trump administration. But Trump 2.0 is unrivaled in its willingness to barrel through the guardrails that have protected government workers since 1883, ignoring legal requirements in its quest to retaliate against some employees and intimidate the rest.
Follow Ruth Marcus
Trump “is the executive of the executive branch, and, therefore, he has the power to fire anyone within the executive branch that he wishes to,” White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt asserted. This is manifestly incorrect, like so many other proclamations since Jan. 20, but that does not make it any less bone-chilling.
And it is a piece of a larger presidential power grab. As I laid out shortly after the election, Trump had a detailed road map to enhance executive power — challenging congressional authority to control spending; putting independent agencies under his thumb; seizing control of the civil service; and abusing his authority to install officials through recess appointments rather than having to endure the inconvenience of Senate confirmation.


We knew this was coming. Trump and his allies trumpeted their plans during the campaign. Still, I had expected this revolution would take months to unfold. Astonishingly, all but the last of these has already come to pass — and we haven’t seen a showdown over recess appointments for the simple reason that the Senate, with the sole exception of the failed effort to install Matt Gaetz as attorney general, has so caved to Trump’s desire to install evidently unqualified candidates in many of the most sensitive positions in government.
The onslaught against government itself has been the most alarming. Some of it involves the operations of Elon Musk’s “Department of Government Efficiency,” operating with unclear legal authority as a kind of roving strike force to terrorize the bureaucracy.
Over the weekend, DOGE operatives forced out a senior Treasury Department official and gained access to the government’s highly sensitive centralized payment system, potentially exposing vast amounts of personnel data. They executed a hostile takeover and shuttering of the U.S. Agency for International Development, an agency that was established by Congress and that can’t be disappeared without congressional action. “USAID is a criminal organization. Time for it to die,” the unelected Musk asserted about an entity that provides humanitarian assistance abroad. Reuters reported that DOGE officials “have locked career civil servants out of computer systems that contain the personal data of millions of federal employees.” And, in an echo of Musk’s “fork in the road” email to Twitter employees after he bought the platform, federal workers have been encouraged to resign en masse, with an email offering inducements of questionable legality.

 
It’s not just the world’s richest man running amok. Trump wasn’t satisfied with a pair of Day 1 executive orders asserting new authority to fire certain civil servants. And so:
  • Trump fired two of three Democratic commissioners on the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and the Democratic chair of the National Labor Relations Board, setting the stage for a constitutional challenge to independent agencies.
  • He dismissed at least 15 inspectors general, most of them appointed by Trump himself in his first term, ignoring the legal requirement that he provide 30 days’ notice to Congress, along with an explanation for his action.
  • The Education Department put on administrative leave at least 50 employees who didn’t work directly on diversity, equity and inclusion but belonged to “affinity groups” or attended voluntary training sessions.
  • At the Justice Department, the acting attorney general fired more than a dozen career prosecutors who had worked for former special counsel Jack Smith on prosecutions of Trump, crossing a dangerous red line. “Given your significant role in prosecuting the President, I do not believe that the leadership of the Department can trust you to assist in implementing the President’s agenda faithfully,” acting attorney general James McHenry informed them.
  • Acting at the instructions of the acting deputy attorney general, previously Trump’s criminal defense lawyer, the interim U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia, an election denier who has represented Jan. 6 defendants, fired about 30 prosecutors who worked on cases involving the insurrection. The department earlier transferred senior officials in the divisions that oversee civil rights, environmental enforcement, national security and public corruption to a newly created office to take action against sanctuary cities.
  • And the acting deputy attorney general ordered the firing of eight senior officials and told the FBI’s acting director to compile a list of all bureau employees assigned to investigate the Jan. 6 attack “to determine whether any additional personnel actions are necessary.” This despite a confirmation hearing pledge from Kash Patel, Trump’s nominee to run the bureau, that “all FBI employees will be protected from political retribution.”
None of this is normal. Little of it is legal. All of it is misguided, and that’s a mild term. The damage to the federal workforce is incalculable. Years of expertise down the drain. The ability to recruit talented employees, same. Why would anyone join an operation that treats its workers this way?
The reason to worry about this is not because of unfairness to federal employees, although there is that — it’s because of the debilitating, even dangerous, impact on government operations. Disruption is one thing in Silicon Valley, where the stakes are merely profit and loss. It is quite another when you are talking about a government charged with ensuring the safety of its citizens.


“What is happening right now,” Stier said, “is the destruction of the institution itself.”
And if you think that can be repaired four years from now, ask yourself: If Trump is successful in purging the government of perceived opponents and putting loyalists in their place, would a new Democratic administration politely play by old-school rules — or would it be justified in engaging in a tit-for-tat response?
The damage has already begun, and it will be difficult to reverse.
 
Ruth Marcus?!? I read that entire thing through to the end and thought for sure it was written by Steve Schmidt.

I mean, it had everything one might find in a Schmidt article: embellishment, melodrama, over exaggeration, wailing & gnashing of teeth, blah, blah, blah.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman
Ruth Marcus?!? I read that entire thing through to the end and thought for sure it was written by Steve Schmidt.

I mean, it had everything one might find in a Schmidt article: embellishment, melodrama, over exaggeration, wailing & gnashing of teeth, blah, blah, blah.
Embellishment? LOL

I question whether you read the article. What did he say that was a lie?

BTW if's funny you seem to care about lying yet voted for Trump. He seldom tells the truth.
 
Ruth Marcus?!? I read that entire thing through to the end and thought for sure it was written by Steve Schmidt.

I mean, it had everything one might find in a Schmidt article: embellishment, melodrama, over exaggeration, wailing & gnashing of teeth, blah, blah, blah.
Nothing but the truth.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Huey Grey
And if you think that can be repaired four years from now, ask yourself: If Trump is successful in purging the government of perceived opponents and putting loyalists in their place, would a new Democratic administration politely play by old-school rules — or would it be justified in engaging in a tit-for-tat response?
The damage has already begun, and it will be difficult to reverse.
It has to be a tit-for-tat response, and then you need to go nuclear. You need to threaten these people with jail time or something like that demanding new amendments get passed to eliminate this crap.
 
Embellishment? LOL

I question whether you read the article. What did he say that was a lie?

BTW if's funny you seem to care about lying yet voted for Trump. He seldom tells the truth.
I don't vote, let alone vote for someone who's pledged undying loyalty to a foreign nation like Israel.

Voting is choosing to ride on the Titanic even though you know beforehand that it's going down.

Have fun rearranging the deck chairs. 🤣
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT