ADVERTISEMENT

Trump Disavowed Project 2025 During the Campaign. Not Anymore.

cigaretteman

HB King
May 29, 2001
78,766
61,175
113
During the campaign, President-elect Donald J. Trump swore he had “nothing to do with” a right-wing policy blueprint known as Project 2025 that would overhaul the federal government, even though many of those involved in developing the plans were his allies.
Mr. Trump even described many of the policy goals as “absolutely ridiculous.” And during his debate with Vice President Kamala Harris, he said he was “not going to read it.”
Now, as he plans his agenda for his return to the White House, Mr. Trump has recruited at least a half dozen architects and supporters of the plan to oversee key issues, including the federal budget, intelligence gathering and his promised plans for mass deportations.
The shift, his critics say, is not exactly a surprise. Mr. Trump disavowed the 900-page manifesto when polls showed it was extremely unpopular with voters. Now that he has won a second term, they say, he appears to be brushing those concerns aside.
Advertisement
SKIP ADVERTISEMENT


“President-elect Trump has dropped all pretense and is charging ahead hand in hand with the right-wing industry players shaping an agenda he denied for the whole campaign,” said Tony Carrk, the executive director of Accountable.US, a government watchdog agency that has been tracking Mr. Trump’s cabinet picks with ties to the project.
Image

Mr. Trump’s cabinet picks and other appointments have reaffirmed the fears of many Democrats and government watchdogs who say Mr. Trump will use Project 2025 as a road map to expand his executive power, replace civil servants with political loyalists and gut government agencies like the Department of Education.
Mr. Trump has picked Russell T. Vought, one of the authors of Project 2025, to lead the powerful Office of Management and Budget. In choosing Mr. Vought, Mr. Trump will have someone who views the position as far more expansive than just overseeing the budget.
Mr. Vought wrote in Project 2025 that the person picked for the job should view themselves as an “approximation of the president’s mind,” while establishing a reputation of the keeper of “commander’s intent.”
Advertisement
SKIP ADVERTISEMENT


In the report, Mr. Vought wrote that the incoming administration should overhaul executive branch institutions, such as the National Security Council and National Economic Council to align with Mr. Trump’s agenda, while abolishing White House offices for domestic climate policy and gender policy.
Earlier this year, Mr. Trump tried to distance himself from his former staffers like Mr. Vought, who also served as budget chief during his first term. Democrats were ramping up attacks that tied Mr. Trump to Project 2025 as voters grew unsettled by its promises to amass power in the executive branch.
Image

“I have no idea who is behind it,” Mr. Trump said on social media in July, despite his ties to former staffers like Mr. Vought.
In a statement this week, Karoline Leavitt, a spokeswoman for the Trump campaign, argued Mr. Trump “never had anything to do” with Project 2025.
Advertisement
SKIP ADVERTISEMENT


“All of President Trump’s cabinet nominees and appointments are wholeheartedly committed to President Trump’s agenda, not the agenda of outside groups,” Ms. Leavitt said.
Mr. Trump has also tapped Stephen Miller to be his deputy chief of staff for policy and Thomas Homan to be a “border czar,” positions that do not require Senate confirmation. Mr. Homan is listed as a contributor to Project 2025. The legal organization Mr. Miller founded during Mr. Biden’s time out of office, America First Legal, was listed at one point as an adviser group to Project 2025.
Image

Both officials will be responsible for elements of Mr. Trump’s goals of establishing detention camps and carrying out mass deportations. The Project 2025 blueprint also recommends rescinding restrictions that prevented immigration agents from carrying out arrests in schools and churches.
Mr. Trump’s pick to lead the Federal Communications Commission, Brendan Carr, wrote a chapter in Project 2025 that called for reining in “Big Tech,” eliminating immunity protections for social media companies and imposing transparency rules on companies like Google, Facebook and YouTube.
Advertisement
SKIP ADVERTISEMENT


“It is hard to imagine another industry in which a greater gap exists between power and accountability,” he wrote.
Other contributors to Project 2025 include Pete Hoekstra, Mr. Trump’s former ambassador to the Netherlands and his current pick to be ambassador to Canada, as well as John Ratcliffe, Mr. Trump’s pick to lead the C.I.A.
A former director of national intelligence, Mr. Ratcliffe was cited repeatedly in the document, including in a chapter on the intelligence community written by Dustin Carmack. Mr. Carmack was Mr. Ratcliffe’s chief of staff when he served as Mr. Trump’s director of National Intelligence in his first administration.
Image

Mr. Carmack made the case in Project 2025 for empowering the director of national intelligence, as the leader of the intelligence community. He also said the leader needed to “address the widely promoted ‘woke’ culture that has spread throughout the federal government with identity politics and ‘social justice’ advocacy replacing such traditional American values as patriotism, colorblindness, and even workplace competence.”
Advertisement


Alex Floyd, the rapid response director of the Democratic National Committee said that “after months of lies to the American people, Donald Trump is taking off the mask.”
“He’s plotting a Project 2025 Cabinet to enact his dangerous vision starting on day one,” Mr. Floyd said.
 
During the campaign, President-elect Donald J. Trump swore he had “nothing to do with” a right-wing policy blueprint known as Project 2025 that would overhaul the federal government, even though many of those involved in developing the plans were his allies.
Mr. Trump even described many of the policy goals as “absolutely ridiculous.” And during his debate with Vice President Kamala Harris, he said he was “not going to read it.”
Now, as he plans his agenda for his return to the White House, Mr. Trump has recruited at least a half dozen architects and supporters of the plan to oversee key issues, including the federal budget, intelligence gathering and his promised plans for mass deportations.
The shift, his critics say, is not exactly a surprise. Mr. Trump disavowed the 900-page manifesto when polls showed it was extremely unpopular with voters. Now that he has won a second term, they say, he appears to be brushing those concerns aside.
Advertisement
SKIP ADVERTISEMENT


“President-elect Trump has dropped all pretense and is charging ahead hand in hand with the right-wing industry players shaping an agenda he denied for the whole campaign,” said Tony Carrk, the executive director of Accountable.US, a government watchdog agency that has been tracking Mr. Trump’s cabinet picks with ties to the project.
Image

Mr. Trump’s cabinet picks and other appointments have reaffirmed the fears of many Democrats and government watchdogs who say Mr. Trump will use Project 2025 as a road map to expand his executive power, replace civil servants with political loyalists and gut government agencies like the Department of Education.
Mr. Trump has picked Russell T. Vought, one of the authors of Project 2025, to lead the powerful Office of Management and Budget. In choosing Mr. Vought, Mr. Trump will have someone who views the position as far more expansive than just overseeing the budget.
Mr. Vought wrote in Project 2025 that the person picked for the job should view themselves as an “approximation of the president’s mind,” while establishing a reputation of the keeper of “commander’s intent.”
Advertisement
SKIP ADVERTISEMENT


In the report, Mr. Vought wrote that the incoming administration should overhaul executive branch institutions, such as the National Security Council and National Economic Council to align with Mr. Trump’s agenda, while abolishing White House offices for domestic climate policy and gender policy.
Earlier this year, Mr. Trump tried to distance himself from his former staffers like Mr. Vought, who also served as budget chief during his first term. Democrats were ramping up attacks that tied Mr. Trump to Project 2025 as voters grew unsettled by its promises to amass power in the executive branch.
Image

“I have no idea who is behind it,” Mr. Trump said on social media in July, despite his ties to former staffers like Mr. Vought.
In a statement this week, Karoline Leavitt, a spokeswoman for the Trump campaign, argued Mr. Trump “never had anything to do” with Project 2025.
Advertisement
SKIP ADVERTISEMENT


“All of President Trump’s cabinet nominees and appointments are wholeheartedly committed to President Trump’s agenda, not the agenda of outside groups,” Ms. Leavitt said.
Mr. Trump has also tapped Stephen Miller to be his deputy chief of staff for policy and Thomas Homan to be a “border czar,” positions that do not require Senate confirmation. Mr. Homan is listed as a contributor to Project 2025. The legal organization Mr. Miller founded during Mr. Biden’s time out of office, America First Legal, was listed at one point as an adviser group to Project 2025.
Image

Both officials will be responsible for elements of Mr. Trump’s goals of establishing detention camps and carrying out mass deportations. The Project 2025 blueprint also recommends rescinding restrictions that prevented immigration agents from carrying out arrests in schools and churches.
Mr. Trump’s pick to lead the Federal Communications Commission, Brendan Carr, wrote a chapter in Project 2025 that called for reining in “Big Tech,” eliminating immunity protections for social media companies and imposing transparency rules on companies like Google, Facebook and YouTube.
Advertisement
SKIP ADVERTISEMENT


“It is hard to imagine another industry in which a greater gap exists between power and accountability,” he wrote.
Other contributors to Project 2025 include Pete Hoekstra, Mr. Trump’s former ambassador to the Netherlands and his current pick to be ambassador to Canada, as well as John Ratcliffe, Mr. Trump’s pick to lead the C.I.A.
A former director of national intelligence, Mr. Ratcliffe was cited repeatedly in the document, including in a chapter on the intelligence community written by Dustin Carmack. Mr. Carmack was Mr. Ratcliffe’s chief of staff when he served as Mr. Trump’s director of National Intelligence in his first administration.
Image

Mr. Carmack made the case in Project 2025 for empowering the director of national intelligence, as the leader of the intelligence community. He also said the leader needed to “address the widely promoted ‘woke’ culture that has spread throughout the federal government with identity politics and ‘social justice’ advocacy replacing such traditional American values as patriotism, colorblindness, and even workplace competence.”
Advertisement


Alex Floyd, the rapid response director of the Democratic National Committee said that “after months of lies to the American people, Donald Trump is taking off the mask.”
“He’s plotting a Project 2025 Cabinet to enact his dangerous vision starting on day one,” Mr. Floyd said.

NY Times? You need to find a better source for news.
 
Bins will say that Kamala also had a plan that is the equivalent of Project 2025 but she also didn’t do some interviews when he wanted her to so everything ended up working out perfectly fine. Both sides.

Bro, Trump is going to be totally fine and just BAU. You won't even be able to notice the difference between a Trump presidency and Biden's presidency other than lower egg prices and lower taxes.
 
Bins will say that Kamala also had a plan that is the equivalent of Project 2025 but she also didn’t do some interviews when he wanted her to so everything ended up working out perfectly fine. Both sides.
The silliness of that style of thinking and not believing what’s in front of your eyes is exactly how this one German who can’t be mentioned came to power. Excusing behavior and telling others who point it out to calm down doesn’t save free countries.
 
Yep. Voters made it very clear. They don't care about policy. At all. Not one bit. Voters said they wanted lies and chaos. So here we are.
Oh, a lot of people know Trump is a liar and has been proven to be incompetent at being POTUS. But, what choice did they have in 2016 and 2024? Trump, or a lady that has a weird laugh?
 
Donald Trump will the President Prevaricator....Liar In Chief.
HIs deception and falsehoods are part of his toxic makeup.
His cabinet selections are a sick joke on the American people
and he will be a disaster for our nation.

.
I think I went 15 years without liking any of your posts. Once you figured out Trump it’s been a different story.
 
Question for liberals here, which elements of Project 2025 are most troubling to you?

A lot of the tenets of P2025 are openly conservative ideals and always have been. I.e. securing borders, deregulation, reducing federal bureaucracy and energy dominance.

Dept of Education needs to be overhauled but not eliminated. That’s where I can see I differ for P2025.

I’m just curious what arrows you’re going to sling saying “I told you so on P2025!” when in reality a lot of the agenda has always been around what conservatism has strived for.
 
Bro, Trump is going to be totally fine and just BAU. You won't even be able to notice the difference between a Trump presidency and Biden's presidency other than lower egg prices and lower taxes.
Speaking of which regarding egg prices...on Election Day I paid $2.99/dozen.
Noticed today that it's already dropped to $4.39!!!

Thanks, Trump.
 
Speaking of which regarding egg prices...on Election Day I paid $2.99/dozen.
Noticed today that it's already dropped to $4.39!!!

Thanks, Trump.

st,small,507x507-pad,600x600,f8f8f8.jpg
 
I’ll let you know when that happens. Thanks for the warning.
Since they’re coming after you before me…what country are moving to?
It's okay, it's just the homos and the non-whites at first. Post here when Vivek and Elon decide that veterans don't need a pension. A lump sum payment in crypto currency is a hearty, "thank you for your service". Health care costs are excessive. Time to trim the fat.
Why do I have to move anywhere? I'm not giving up. I'm doing the heavy lifting for you.
 
Question for liberals here, which elements of Project 2025 are most troubling to you?

A lot of the tenets of P2025 are openly conservative ideals and always have been. I.e. securing borders, deregulation, reducing federal bureaucracy and energy dominance.

Dept of Education needs to be overhauled but not eliminated. That’s where I can see I differ for P2025.

I’m just curious what arrows you’re going to sling saying “I told you so on P2025!” when in reality a lot of the agenda has always been around what conservatism has strived for.
I’ll start with private school kids being protected from military service. Public school students will have to take a military aptitude test. Not private school kids. Firing thousands of government workers in order to have only loyalists is more than a tad authoritarian. I could type easily a dozen things that are radical if I wasn’t ready to go to sleep.
 
Trump is a liar, we all know that. And those that voted for him just want lower egg prices and to keep a black woman out of the White House.
Wouldn’t the people that kept a black woman out of the White House be people that voted for Biden in 2020 but not Harris in 2024?
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT