President Trump signs an executive order that establishes a National Council for the American Worker, which will focus on responding to workforce issues across the country.
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I guess Tradition, you just like being lied to. My God. The only institutions that have ever furthered workers pay and benefits are unions.
A press release by a president who debased himself in front of a dictator with a second world economy dependent on oil prices doesn’t change that.. thanks for playing.
Suddenly the dems don't think the federal government is capable of helping workers.
#progress
Suddenly the dems don't think the federal government is capable of helping workers.
#progress
Context matters. The GOP use organizations to enrich themselves at the expense of others. You all fear the exact government you vote for. Democrats like to use organizations the way they are intended to be used, and that is to help the people. The GOP hates this because they don't get to enrich themselves this way, and more importantly, it often exposes how terrible of people they actually are.
You have to be kidding!
Democrats and unions have a long, corrupt history of enriching themselves at the expense of others.
It's not unions fault that you consider higher salaries, benefits, and 40 hour work weeks the "expense of others". I'm not going to shed too many tears for the multi-billionaires that maybe only made $15 million instead of $16 million because of it. Wait, who am I kidding? Of course those CEO's didn't take a pay cut. They just let the business go bankrupt so they can also collect on their multi-million dollar golden parachute.
Good grief, the 40-hour workweek was won in the 1930s. WTF has the union done for anyone lately?
Lately? Not much. Probably has something to do with them being systematically exterminated. Unions only work when there are a lot of them. That said, 40 hour week is still the standard. When even the faintest remnants of unions are gone, so will overtime and paid time off.
Good grief, the 40-hour workweek was won in the 1930s. WTF has the union done for anyone lately?
You know there has been serious discussion in this administration of eliminating child labor laws?
https://news.bloomberglaw.com/daily...ration-wants-to-train-teens-in-hazardous-jobs
If a child wants to make money in a non-hazardous, appropriate situation to do so, why should the all-knowing government say, "no"?
We have authentic family-owned Chinese and Mexican restaurants where I live, and their "underaged" children are working there and doing a good job. Which is perfectly legal.
The Chinese place has a girl who appears about 12-years-old running the counter who runs circles around the slobs at the fast food franchises.
Why is that okay for a "family" business but not an evil franchise or corp. owned business?
Sounds like an unfair business advantage to me.
Absolutely. That has no potential for abuse at all. Are you trolling?
Did you work before you were 16? I did. I wanted the money. Why can't I be allowed to make money in a free society?
If abuse is the problem, fix the abuse. But don't punish the enterprising young person who wants to make money.
This is utter ridiculous. Kids don't know when they are being abused. There's a reason those laws were put in there in the first place and it wasn't to punish "enterprising young person who wants to make money".
Now Tradition believes in the govt when it’s run by an enabler of an incompetent dictator.
Exact-friggin-ly! These friggers are so dumb, they don't even realize it! You can bet, it will be very worker friendly/fair, too!Lol. Now the deregulater has made a new bureaucracy. I love this guy, even Trump wants a bigger government.
Exact-friggin-ly! These friggers are so dumb, they don't even realize it! You can bet, it will be very worker friendly/fair, too!
Before I react any way, what is this council going to do? I don't think an EO can force businesses to pick up the tab for educating/training unqualified applicants. I don't think an EO can offer them incentives to do this.
The Pledge to the American Worker is meant persuade employers to make new investments in training current and future workers, and allowing workers to learn in-demand skills and competencies.
I see. So, what's new?
Are the employers pledging $$ to educating/training the basically unskilled?Many large employers are signing on to the pledge.
Who is gonna fund it? Its a long ways from being reality. These schemes have been tried before.How is job skills training paid for by employers not "worker friendly"?
Are the employers pledging $$ to educating/training the basically unskilled?
Who is gonna fund it? Its a long ways from being reality. These schemes have been tried before.
The trouble is Trad, your freedom always needs someone to wear chains.I'm sure each different company has different needs and will support the pledge in ways that makes sense for them and their workers.
Ahhhh, I love the smell of freedom.
So it's a useless pledge? Companies already do this. No sin with the EO, but it's nothing to celebrate. This is what you're telling me?I'm sure each different company has different needs and will support the pledge in ways that makes sense for them and their workers.
Ahhhh, I love the smell of freedom.