Please explain what you think a "laptop op" means in the context of the letter I linked.
What you're doing is beyond deliberately obtuse.
Keep in mind that letter, initiated by the Biden campaign, came in conjunction with an FBI effort to 'pre-bunk' the laptop story:
For nearly a year, the FBI had been conditioning social media companies to expect a “hack-and leak” operation from Russia involving Hunter Biden. In more than thirty meetings across eight months, the FBI led Big Tech to believe that the allegations in the Post story were Russian disinformation, even though the FBI had authenticated Hunter Biden’s laptop nearly a year prior.
On July 17, 2023, the House Judiciary Committee and Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government conducted a transcribed interview of Laura Dehmlow, the Section Chief of the FBI’s Foreign Influence Task Force (FITF). During her transcribed interview, Dehmlow revealed that the same FBI personnel who were warning social media companies about a potential Russian “hack and leak” operation in the run-up to the 2020 election knew that the laptop belonging to Hunter Biden was not Russian disinformation. After the New York Post broke a story based on the contents of the laptop about Biden family influence peddling, the FBI made the institutional decision to refuse to answer direct questions from social media companies about the laptop’s authenticity—despite months of constant information sharing up to that time. Put simply, after the FBI conditioned social media companies to believe that the laptop was the product of a hack-and-dump operation, the Bureau stopped its information sharing, allowing social media companies to conclude that the New York Post story was Russian disinformation.
Funny how the worst disinformation always comes from the government itself.
nypost.com
