Deplorable and frightening:
Candidates for top national security positions in the Trump administration have faced questions that appear designed to determine whether they have embraced the president’s false claims about the outcome of the 2020 election and its aftermath, according to people familiar with cases of such screening.
Sign up for Fact Checker, our weekly review of what's true, false or in-between in politics.
The questions asked of several current and former officials up for top intelligence agency and law enforcement posts revolved around two events that have become President Donald Trump’s litmus test to distinguish friend from foe: the result of the 2020 election and the Jan. 6, 2021, assault on the U.S. Capitol, according to the people, who, like others interviewed for this report, spoke on the condition of anonymity because of the matter’s sensitivity.
These people said that two individuals, both former officials who were being considered for positions within the intelligence community, were asked to give “yes” or “no” responses to the questions: Was Jan. 6 “an inside job?” And was the 2020 presidential election “stolen?”
These individuals, who did not give the desired straight “yes” answers, were not selected. It is not clear whether other factors contributed to the decision.
The questions were posed in direct interviews conducted by personnel hiring for the new administration.
One former official familiar with the questions posed to one of the candidates said: “He was not willing to compromise his integrity by saying things he knew weren’t true. He’s not losing any sleep over his decision.”
Political fealty has been a prerequisite for positions at all levels of the new administration, including for current civil servants seeking new assignments. But former national security and other officials said it is especially important for the nation’s security that intelligence professionals be able to give the president accurate information, even if it does not align with his policy or political preferences.
“It’s normal for a new administration to ask potential political appointees about their political views to assure that they align with the new administration,” said John Bellinger III, who served as the senior counsel for the White House National Security Council in the George W. Bush administration. “And it’s appropriate for a new administration to ask career officials if they are comfortable carrying out the new administration’s policies. But it’s not appropriate to condition jobs, especially in the intelligence and law enforcement community, on partisan political stances. We want career officials to interpret intelligence and enforce the laws in a neutral way without any partisan preference.”
Separately, at least two individuals in FBI field offices outside Washington, who were being interviewed for senior positions, were asked similar questions, said one U.S. official familiar with the incidents. The questions included: Who were the “real patriots” on Jan. 6? Who won the 2020 election? Who is your “real boss?”
These agents have yet to hear the outcome of their interviews, according to the official.
Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Illinois) said in a letter last week to the acting FBI director, Brian Driscoll, that he received “credible information” that a “loyalty test is being implemented in the leadership hiring process, with candidates being asked about the 2020 election and January 6, 2021.”
In a statement to The Washington Post, White House deputy press secretary Anna Kelly said: “It is entirely appropriate that candidates for national security positions in the Trump administration align with President Trump’s agenda to put America First.”
Trump has repeatedly falsely claimed that he won the 2020 election and asserted that thousands of his supporters who attacked the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, were patriots. Some right-wing voices have suggested the insurrection was an “inside job” organized by the FBI.
Candidates for top national security positions in the Trump administration have faced questions that appear designed to determine whether they have embraced the president’s false claims about the outcome of the 2020 election and its aftermath, according to people familiar with cases of such screening.
Sign up for Fact Checker, our weekly review of what's true, false or in-between in politics.
The questions asked of several current and former officials up for top intelligence agency and law enforcement posts revolved around two events that have become President Donald Trump’s litmus test to distinguish friend from foe: the result of the 2020 election and the Jan. 6, 2021, assault on the U.S. Capitol, according to the people, who, like others interviewed for this report, spoke on the condition of anonymity because of the matter’s sensitivity.
These people said that two individuals, both former officials who were being considered for positions within the intelligence community, were asked to give “yes” or “no” responses to the questions: Was Jan. 6 “an inside job?” And was the 2020 presidential election “stolen?”
These individuals, who did not give the desired straight “yes” answers, were not selected. It is not clear whether other factors contributed to the decision.
The questions were posed in direct interviews conducted by personnel hiring for the new administration.
One former official familiar with the questions posed to one of the candidates said: “He was not willing to compromise his integrity by saying things he knew weren’t true. He’s not losing any sleep over his decision.”
Political fealty has been a prerequisite for positions at all levels of the new administration, including for current civil servants seeking new assignments. But former national security and other officials said it is especially important for the nation’s security that intelligence professionals be able to give the president accurate information, even if it does not align with his policy or political preferences.
“It’s normal for a new administration to ask potential political appointees about their political views to assure that they align with the new administration,” said John Bellinger III, who served as the senior counsel for the White House National Security Council in the George W. Bush administration. “And it’s appropriate for a new administration to ask career officials if they are comfortable carrying out the new administration’s policies. But it’s not appropriate to condition jobs, especially in the intelligence and law enforcement community, on partisan political stances. We want career officials to interpret intelligence and enforce the laws in a neutral way without any partisan preference.”
Separately, at least two individuals in FBI field offices outside Washington, who were being interviewed for senior positions, were asked similar questions, said one U.S. official familiar with the incidents. The questions included: Who were the “real patriots” on Jan. 6? Who won the 2020 election? Who is your “real boss?”
These agents have yet to hear the outcome of their interviews, according to the official.
Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Illinois) said in a letter last week to the acting FBI director, Brian Driscoll, that he received “credible information” that a “loyalty test is being implemented in the leadership hiring process, with candidates being asked about the 2020 election and January 6, 2021.”
In a statement to The Washington Post, White House deputy press secretary Anna Kelly said: “It is entirely appropriate that candidates for national security positions in the Trump administration align with President Trump’s agenda to put America First.”
Trump has repeatedly falsely claimed that he won the 2020 election and asserted that thousands of his supporters who attacked the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, were patriots. Some right-wing voices have suggested the insurrection was an “inside job” organized by the FBI.
