ADVERTISEMENT

U.S. Will Change Names of 660 Places That Include Slur for Native Women

cigaretteman

HR King
May 29, 2001
77,418
58,905
113
The map dots, resembling a scattergram of America, point to snow-covered pinnacles, remote islands and places in between.
Each of the 660 points, shown on maps of federal lands and waterways, includes the word “squaw” in its name, a term Native Americans regard as a racist and misogynistic slur.
Now the Interior Department, led by Deb Haaland, the first Native American cabinet secretary, is taking steps to strip the word from mountains, rivers, lakes and other geographic sites and has solicited input from tribes on new names for the landmarks.
A task force created by the department will submit the new names for final approval from the Board on Geographic Names, the federal body that standardizes American place names. The National Park Service was ordered to take similar steps.
Advertisement
Continue reading the main story


“Words matter, particularly in our work to make our nation’s public lands and waters accessible and welcoming to people of all backgrounds,” Ms. Haaland said in a statement. “Consideration of these replacements is a big step forward in our efforts to remove derogatory terms whose expiration dates are long overdue.”
The move comes as private companies and professional sports teams are shedding names and imagery that many Native Americans find offensive amid a broader national reckoning over systemic racism.
Several states have passed laws mandating the erasure of the slur from nonfederal sites. They include Oregon, Maine, Montana and Minnesota, where at least one community, the city of Squaw Lake, has clung to its name. A bill has been introduced in the State Assembly in California to rename more than 100 places in that state.


Few places are more closely associated with the reckoning than Squaw Valley, the ski area in Lake Tahoe, in Northern California, that hosted the 1960 Winter Olympics. The private resort, which is not part of the federal renaming effort, rebranded itself Palisades Tahoe last September after years of debate over its identity.
Advertisement
Continue reading the main story


All but 10 states appear to have at least one geographic feature on federal land or waterways that contains the slur, according to an interactive map maintained by the federal government. The names of civil features, including counties and incorporated places like Squaw Lake, Minn., are not part of the federal effort because they are outside the government’s authority.
Vanessa Esquivido, 36, a member of the Nor Rel Muk Wintu Nation in Northern California, said the slur’s continued use perpetuated demeaning stereotypes of Native American women.
Dr. Esquivido, a former professor of American Indian studies at California State University at Chico, said that the reckoning over the word was long overdue, but that Indigenous people still encountered a lack of awareness over its meaning.
“Native women and Native land are synonymous,” she said. “By calling them the S-word, it takes away their humanity. They’re nameless. They’re tribeless.”
Some places on the federal government’s list are better known than others. Among the more familiar is Squaw Mountain, an 8,000-foot peak near Provo, Utah, that is popular with hikers, in part for its panoramic views. It is featured on the website of Explore Utah Valley, a tourism organization, which did not respond to a request for comment.
Other locales that bear the slur are far more obscure, relegated to nautical charts, such as Squaw Rocks, an outcropping in Long Island Sound off the coast of Branford, Conn.
Jane Bouley, a former town historian in Branford, said that the name most likely referred to a member of the Totoket tribe, a branch of the Quinnipiac Indians, who is identified in deeds from the 1730s and 1740s as Hannah Squaw.



“They eventually sold out to the colonists, whether under duress or of their own accord,” Ms. Bouley said, referring to the Totoket tribe, explaining that the nautical feature isn’t really a landmark. “It’s not even something you can hardly put your shoe on, especially with the tides rising,” she said.
Type the word “squaw” into Google Maps or Apple Maps and a number of hits come up. Google, which relies on third-party data, information from local authorities and other sources, said the federal name changes would be reflected on its maps once they are finalized. Apple did not respond to requests for comment.
On Facebook and Instagram, visitors can still check in at Squaw Valley and tag their photos with the retired name more than five months after the resort became Palisades Tahoe. Meta, which owns both platforms, did not respond to a request for comment last week.
State governments have for decades been slowly chipping away at the pejorative names.
In 2003, a state panel in Arizona voted to rename a mountain in Phoenix called Squaw Peak for Lori Piestewa, an Army specialist who was killed in Iraq that year and was the first Native American woman to die in combat while serving in the American military. Many Native Americans had been pressing for the change, which the Board on Geographic Names affirmed in 2008, but some critics said at the time that it was a heavy-handed, political move.
In 2000, mountains, waterways and other features in Maine were renamed under a state law targeting the slur, which a tribal representative said at the time had been used to slander women with offensive sexual connotations.
Name changes made at the state level are approved by the Board on Geographic Names, which has previously done away with pejorative terms for African Americans and Japanese people, to ensure they are used uniformly throughout the government.
The National Association of Tribal Historic Preservation Officers published a report this year that said national efforts to rename geographic locations in the United States that still bear racist or sexual slurs against Native Americans and African Americans were not “canceling history.”
Advertisement
Continue reading the main story


“Rather,” it said, “it is an opportunity to provide a more honest accounting of America’s past and a gesture toward healing historic wounds.”

 
If you look around old USGS topo maps there's lots of offensive names still out there. Lots of Squaw Tit Hills and Ni**er Head Rock.
No reason to keep that stuff around.

I fully agree. The only issue I take is that suggestions for replacement names should come from all parts of American society and not just Native Americans.

I recognize the past mistreatment of Native Americans and the current disrespectful usages of their culture or names. But America's future is all of ours now. Everyone should get a voice.

And yes some things should probably be given names that are preferential to various Native tribes. But I don't think they should get to re-name the whole lot either.
 
Do native Americans actually find the term "squaw" offensive or is this another woke white folk form of virtue signaling BS?

"If I was to marry a white man and he would dare call me a 'squaw'—as an epithet with the sarcasm that we know so well—I believe that I would feel like killing him."

Written by Native American author Mourning Dove in 1927.


Уходи русский
 
This is what dems are good at, let's call it diversion. They can't discuss record high inflation and gas prices, they refuse to enforce the law as it relates to the border, they don't want to acknowledge the rampant crime problem, they certainly don't want to discuss Biden's swing and miss with Putin. So I know, let's change the names of some things........:rolleyes:
 
This is what dems are good at, let's call it diversion. They can't discuss record high inflation and gas prices, they refuse to enforce the law as it relates to the border, they don't want to acknowledge the rampant crime problem, they certainly don't want to discuss Biden's swing and miss with Putin. So I know, let's change the names of some things........:rolleyes:
Don't worry Abby, no one can stop you from continuing to use the slurs in your head.
 
This is what dems are good at, let's call it diversion. They can't discuss record high inflation and gas prices, they refuse to enforce the law as it relates to the border, they don't want to acknowledge the rampant crime problem, they certainly don't want to discuss Biden's swing and miss with Putin. So I know, let's change the names of some things........:rolleyes:
If you try a little harder, you could probably come up with another talking point or two.
 
I never knew this was an offensive term. I just saw an article from 2017. It had a few sentences from the article talking about the word squaw. When I opened the article it had been updated in 2018 with "s-word" replacing squaw. That's nuts.
 
The word has become an epithet but it was not always so.

The earliest recorded use of the word is in a book Mourt’s Relation: A Journey of the Pilgrims at Plymouth written in the early 1620's. It was used to refer to the “squa sachim or Massachusets Queen”. Her real name isn't known, I don't think, but she led the Massachuset (Algonquin) tribe near present-day Boston.

A few years later:

The 15th of the 2d month, 1639.
We Webcowit and Squaw Sachem do sell unto the Inhabitants of the Towne of Charlestown, all the land within the line granted them by the court, (excepting the farms and the ground, on the west of the two great Ponds called Mistick ponds, from the south side of Mr. Nowell’s lot, near the upper end of the Ponds, unto the little runnet that cometh from Capt. Cook’s mills, which the Squaw reserveth to their use, for her life, for the Indians to plant and hunt upon, and the weare above the ponds, they also reserve for the Indians to fish at whilest the Squaw liveth, and after the death of Squaw Sachem, she doth leave all her lands from Mr. Mayhue’s house to near Salem to the present Governor, Mr. John Winthrop, Senior, Mr. Increase Nowell, Mr. John Wilson, Mr. Edward Gibbons to dispose of, and all Indians to depart, and for satisfaction from Charlestown, we acknowledge to have received in full satisfaction, twenty and one coats, nineteen fathom of wampum, and three bushels of corn.


There are multiple references to her as she interacted with Europeans over the years until her death in 1667. FTR, Squaw Sachem literally translates from Algonquin to "female chief". The term is still used by native Algonquin speakers today.
 
As one who had his road name changed from Squaw, I can tell you that it has created a myriad of problems. It has been quite unpleasant and who no knows how much mail is no longer being forwarded because it has been over a year. We contacted everyone we know and do business with to notify them of the change. A number of them continue to send it to the old address so we have to re-contact them. Navigating their automated phone systems is a joy in many instances. I’m waiting to see if the word Indian is going to be changed as well.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: bojihawk44
As one who had his road name changed from Squaw, I can tell you that it has created a myriad of problems. It has been quite unpleasant and who no knows how much mail is no longer being forwarded because it has been over a year. We contacted everyone we know and do business with to notify them of the change. A number of them continue to send it to the old address so we have to re-contact them. Navigating their automated phone systems is a joy in many instances. I’m waiting to see if the word Indian is going to be changed as well.
LOL
 
  • Like
Reactions: bojihawk44
Does the federal government in selecting a new Native American name for honoring or recognizing imply that was the purpose of the original selection, squaw?

If so, where's the slur?
 
Does the federal government in selecting a new Native American name for honoring or recognizing imply that was the purpose of the original selection, squaw?

If so, where's the slur?
No. These are historical names that got transferred onto govt maps, etc over the years and are now being removed. Back then no one cared if it was offensive to native americans or black people. Now we do. Well....some of us do.

Here's a good piece on the issue, but the three most common offensive terms on US maps are squaw, jap and ni##er.

 
No. These are historical names that got transferred onto govt maps, etc over the years and are now being removed. Back then no one cared if it was offensive to native americans or black people. Now we do. Well....some of us do.

Here's a good piece on the issue, but the three most common offensive terms on US maps are squaw, jap and ni##er.

Whorehouse Meadow seems fairly offensive in any era.
Also, where Abby's mom was born, if that translates from Cyrillic.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BelemNole
No. These are historical names that got transferred onto govt maps, etc over the years and are now being removed. Back then no one cared if it was offensive to native americans or black people. Now we do. Well....some of us do.

Here's a good piece on the issue, but the three most common offensive terms on US maps are squaw, jap and ni##er.

Thanks, I'll read the link in a bit. Sounds interesting, and even "funny" if only for the outrageousness of some of the names.

As to your post: Yes, a lot of offensive names crept in. But certainly a ton of honorific names used as well. In Iowa, for example, there is Sioux City and Keokuk, named for a Sauk Chief. Hundreds of tribe names for counties across the country and I believe even the proud mascot of ... oh I forget!

So, I get back to was squaw intended as a slur when used in naming, cuz I can't remember the last time I heard someone shout you dumb f****ng stupid ... SQUAW!
 
Thanks, I'll read the link in a bit. Sounds interesting, and even "funny" if only for the outrageousness of some of the names.

As to your post: Yes, a lot of offensive names crept in. But certainly a ton of honorific names used as well. In Iowa, for example, there is Sioux City and Keokuk, named for a Sauk Chief. Hundreds of tribe names for counties across the country and I believe even the proud mascot of ... oh I forget!

So, I get back to was squaw intended as a slur when used in naming, cuz I can't remember the last time I heard someone shout you dumb f****ng stupid ... SQUAW!
Probably not anymore than "Dead Ni**er Gulch" was meant as a slur. It was just the language of the people in the area who named features.
 
I honestly had no idea it was considered a slur and I’m shocked by some of the other terms that have endured over the years. Definitely time for them to go, looking at you Linn County, I believe you have an offensively named creek and an associated park to rename.
 
Probably not anymore than "Dead Ni**er Gulch" was meant as a slur. It was just the language of the people in the area who named features.
So if it wasn't intended to be offensive, then perhaps for a period was corrupted into a derogatory word, but now is widely held not to be offensive, then, again, what is the problem?

To be the namesake of a creek, lake, butte, mountain etc. I think over time would surely engender positive feelings for the name.
 
I honestly had no idea it was considered a slur and I’m shocked by some of the other terms that have endured over the years. Definitely time for them to go, looking at you Linn County, I believe you have an offensively named creek and an associated park to rename.
I'd say if you had no idea it was a slur then it's probably not a slur. Consider also that most people feel like you.

Now to the serious stuff ... hands off my Squaw Creek and Squaw Park! They already renamed my beloved Squaw Creek Golf Course.

I noticed "Papoose" proposed as a replacement name on the federal map.

I'd be very ok with Papoose Creek, for example. Instead the course is now named "Gardner Golf Course." Ugh. He was a County Commissioner, I believe. So they honored a white bureaucrat. Double Ugh.
 
So if it wasn't intended to be offensive, then perhaps for a period was corrupted into a derogatory word, but now is widely held not to be offensive, then, again, what is the problem?

To be the namesake of a creek, lake, butte, mountain etc. I think over time would surely engender positive feelings for the name.
Because ignorance has never been an acceptable excuse. And just because derogatory terms were common in the past when groups of people weren’t treated as equally human doesn’t mean we should continue to use that language. Same reason we don’t still own slaves or have children work in factories.
 
Because ignorance has never been an acceptable excuse. And just because derogatory terms were common in the past when groups of people weren’t treated as equally human doesn’t mean we should continue to use that language. Same reason we don’t still own slaves or have children work in factories.
So everyone who doesn't currently either know "squaw" to be offensive or consider it as such is ignorant?

And how dumb analogizing this to slavery.
 
Because ignorance has never been an acceptable excuse. And just because derogatory terms were common in the past when groups of people weren’t treated as equally human doesn’t mean we should continue to use that language. Same reason we don’t still own slaves or have children work in factories.
What's more likely is people didn't even know they were supposed to be offended by those terms.;) Good thing white liberals were there to educate them.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT