ADVERTISEMENT

USA Today's Nancy Armour

The Tradition

HB King
Apr 23, 2002
128,620
103,309
113
Why is someone who so obviously hates football allowed to be a "sports columnist" writing about football?

In today's screed, full of hyperbole, piss and vinegar, she claims that "not a damn thing ever changes" (guess she missed all the rule changes and flags for helmet-to-helmet contact) and dismissed the NFLs donation of $30 million to the National Institutes of Health and a $60 million partnership with GE on the Head Health Initiative.

"But for a league that generated $10 billion in revenues last year... Imagine what a difference it could make if the NFL threw even one of those billions at scientists," she bleats. Does she not understand the difference between revenues and profits? Does anyone really think a billion dollars would satisfy her blood lust for the league and the game?

Stabler and Morall acquired their injuries a long time ago playing a game that was much different than it is today. If we have to listen to this crapola every time a former player dies, whether the cause of death was CTE or not, then she's engaging in propaganda, not journalistic opinions based on facts.

http://www.usatoday.com/story/sport...-earl-morrall-cte-nfl-super-bowl-50/79786264/
 
scientists? the same people who claim a hoax - global warming- is real? we need to throw money at those guys!
 
She's just upset that women's soccer doesn't receive all the attention and money that the NFL does.
 
The simple answer is that the USA Today is run by left-wing hacks, who for some reason hate
Football, Newborns, Capitalists and red meat.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT