Vacating Private Property Rights & Viable Rental Agreements--marxism at its finest
- Thread starter Here_4_a_Day
- Start date
God damn its hilarious how they can take such a resource rich state and make it an absolute shithole all in the name of politics.
Hotels and motels are forced to take in and give priority to homeless and ILLEGALS over paying guests. Love the tweet by the activist/marxist telling this garbage they are just as good as any other person in the facility. CA and MN are both trying to make private ownership of rental property illegal.
Do you have a source on that? I ask because I did a google search on it and could not find anything.
Because that would seem to be a formula to put all hotels and motels out of business entirely. Would seem to be that anyone could use that to simply go live rent free in the nicest hotel they can find.
Another dumb idea inspired by Bernie Sanders and the Squad.
You can Google the code and find the entire issue, but this shows it's real > https://law.justia.com/codes/califo...3/part-4/title-5/chapter-2-4/section-1954-08/
Putting businesses out of business is what marxists do!
From what I've found it sounds to me like any homeless person who's under a state funded shelter program who is in in a motel/hotel which is paid for by the state funded shelter program has to be treated the same as a paying customer.
If the shelter program is paying the hotel and the sheltered persons are following the rules. What is the problem?
I'm done doing it for you, comrade:
"The Los Angeles Housing Department announced this week that 17 owners of residential hotels in the city have received warnings over letting out rooms to tourists, highlighting that they are breaking city law if the rooms aren’t being rented out to city residents instead."
I'm done doing it for you, comrade:
"The Los Angeles Housing Department announced this week that 17 owners of residential hotels in the city have received warnings over letting out rooms to tourists, highlighting that they are breaking city law if the rooms aren’t being rented out to city residents instead."
If they are being paid the same, what is the difference?
A hell of a lot even beyond being told WTF to do by the GOV [forced].
Seems to me that they should rent out rooms to whomever will pay and follow the rules.
Do you find it tricky logging out as the OP, then back in to post this dribble (yes, dribble), then back in as the OP? Sounds exhausting.
Doesn’t it get exhausting jerking off to Bernie Sanders and articles written by Aaron Rupar everyday.
Funny, since that what we should ALL be asking you. You're literally the ONLY person who brings him up on this forum.
Similar threads
