ADVERTISEMENT

VERDICT IS IN: Woman Distracted by Cell phone, kills woman & brain injury for Fiance

Franisdaman

HB King
Nov 3, 2012
95,813
129,903
113
Heaven, Iowa
In the case that follows, a woman was distracted by her cell phone where as a result she ended up rear ending a car; the the female driver of the car rear ended was killed and the passenger (her fiance) was left with a traumatic brain Injury.

When you drive, what do you do with your phone?

Do you text and drive? Do you make calls and/or retrieve calls and if you do, do you do it through the phone or hands free?

I try to stay off my phone completely.

Check out this article; its a reminder what can happen when distracted while driving.

As you will see, many lives are forever changed. One person is dead; one will have to recover from a brain injury; the driver who caused the accident is on trial.

Right before the crash the distracted driver had looked at a text message that simply said “Okay.”


Gross negligence, or just a horrible mistake, in deadly I-35W crash?

By SARAH HORNER | shorner@pioneerpress.com | Pioneer Press
PUBLISHED: February 9, 2018 at 12:48 pm | UPDATED: February 9, 2018 at 11:27 pm


It was a partly sunny spring day, and Brea Amanda Miller and her fiance were on their way to pick up their 2-year-old daughter from the toddler’s grandmother’s house when they got caught in traffic.

Bridge work lay ahead on Interstate 35W and a long line of cars were backed up along the freeway in New Brighton.

The couple waited at the back of the line when Destiny Xiong, on her way to pick up her own three children in Brooklyn Center, smashed into the rear of their car.

The impact crushed the couple’s Honda Fit, forcing the vehicle into the car in front of it, which in turn hit another car. Miller died three days later from her injuries. Her fiance, Michael Bain, survived but suffered a traumatic brain injury and broken ribs.

The defense and prosecuting attorneys now trying Xiong’s criminal vehicular homicide case don’t dispute that Xiong had just looked at a short text message — it said “Okay” — before the crash and was trying to place her phone on the dashboard when she accidentally dropped it.

It was just after she leaned over to retrieve it and looked up that the collision occurred, according to opening statements by defense attorney Earl Gray and Assistant Ramsey County attorney Margaret Gustafson Samec.

But they differ on how fast Xiong, 36, a human resources generalist for the Minneapolis police department, was driving at the time and whether her actions were merely careless, as her defense team suggests, or grossly negligent, as the state asserts.

The state needs to prove to the jury that Xiong was grossly negligent to win its case.

“This isn’t a speeding case; it’s a case about gross negligence … She chose to look down and dig around for that phone,” Samec said during her opening statement Wednesday, adding that Xiong drove past five signs related to the bridge work before the crash. “(Xiong) didn’t care about her own safety or the safety of the other drivers that day.”

Gray told the jurors that such a contention is off the mark.

He said the state’s crash reconstructionist made critical errors in estimating how fast Xiong was going that day, and said none of the signs Xiong drove past urged drivers to slow down. Most were detour signs, Gray said.

He added that the defense will show that Xiong was driving about 55 mph at the time, slightly less than the posted 60-mph speed limit.

Samec said the state trooper who reconstructed the crash scene estimates her speed was between 62 and 72 mph. That was revised down from initial estimates, which put her speed anywhere from 68 to 80 mph.

“We contend that Mrs. Xiong was negligent. … She (made) a mistake. She looked down to get (her phone) and when she looked up, there was a line of cars stopped in front of her. It was dead stopped,” Gray said Thursday. “She was careless, but she wasn’t grossly negligent.”

Testimony in Xiong’s case resumed Friday and likely will continue into next week.

The victim’s family and friends filled three rows in the Ramsey County District courtroom for the trial’s start. Xiong’s family also attended, including her husband, who sat in the front row.

Miller, of St. Paul, was remembered in her obituary as a “loving and devoted mother” who was quick to help anyone who needed it. She was 31 when she died. Her fiance, Bain, was 37 at the time.

In addition to criminal vehicular homicide, Xiong faces one count of criminal vehicular operation resulting in great bodily harm for Bain’s injuries.

The crash took place in the late afternoon of May 1, 2016, on 35W just north of County Road D.

An off-duty Minneapolis firefighter witnessed the collision and rushed to help. He was able to extricate Miller from the Honda Fit by cutting off her seat belt. A nurse also stopped and performed CPR on Miller while the firefighter tended to Bain, court records say.

Both were taken by ambulance to Hennepin County Medical Center in Minneapolis.

Xiong, who lives in Hudson with her family, later told police she could not recall if she braked before smashing into their vehicle. Drivers of both the other vehicles involved said they had been at a complete stop when the collision occurred.

Distracted driving was deemed a factor in more than 86,000 crashes across Minnesota between 2011 and 2015, contributing to more than one in four crashes in that time, according to the State Patrol.

In 2015, distracted driving contributed to 7,666 injuries and 74 deaths.


xiong-destiny-mug.jpg


Destiny Xiong


160515_BreaMiller.jpg


Brea Miller, right (killed in crash), and her daughter, Izzy.





LINK:
https://www.twincities.com/2018/02/...ust-a-horrible-mistake-in-deadly-i-35w-crash/
 
Last edited:
The article makes it sound like texting wasn't the problem. The problem was trying to pick the phone up off the floor while she was driving.

And why would you keep your phone on the dash??
 
People texting and driving is rampant.

The crazy thing is that many don't even try to be discreet about it. They do it out in the open for everyone to see.
Agreed.

Whenever at a stop light, look to your right and to your left; most times people are looking down at their phones while waiting for the light to turn green.
 
The article makes it sound like texting wasn't the problem. The problem was trying to pick the phone up off the floor while she was driving.
When you look at a text, that is technically texting, correct? She did not reply to the text, but she looked at her phone to read the text, which to me is texting and driving.

From the article:

The defense and prosecuting attorneys now trying Xiong’s criminal vehicular homicide case don’t dispute that Xiong had just looked at a short text message — it said “Okay” — before the crash and was trying to place her phone on the dashboard when she accidentally dropped it.
 
I have my phone set to not notify me of any texts or calls while I am driving. It makes a huge difference in terms of me not talking or texting.

I have mine set the same, but I nonetheless still put it in the glove compartment when I get in the car in order to take away all distraction.

Thanks to the OP for the reminder. We all know its dangerous, but nothing drives it home like hearing true stories of losses suffered.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hwkfn1
I have mine set the same, but I nonetheless still put it in the glove compartment when I get in the car in order to take away all distraction.

Thanks to the OP for the reminder. We all know its dangerous, but nothing drives it home like hearing true stories of losses suffered.
I have a niece who was driving in town at a slower speed and rear ended a car; that car then hit another car; her car and the car she first hit were totaled; luckily nobody was hurt; i asked my brother what caused the accident and he would not say but makes me wonder if she were on her phone

the statistics on crashes involving distracted driving are alarming, to say the least
 
Hypothetical- The driver that initiated the crash had already picked up her 3 kids. They're fighting. She turns around to see who's doing what, etc. Same set of events occur as when she went to retrieve her phone. Does that constitute careless or negligent?

I would contend, most anything that happens in a car, can be ignored (i.e. kids fighting, cell phone, dropped cigarette lighter, etc.) and given our world NOW, all the above would be negligence if you act to remedy and cause an accident.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HKI
Hypothetical- The driver that initiated the crash had already picked up her 3 kids. They're fighting. She turns around to see who's doing what, etc. Same set of events occur as when she went to retrieve her phone. Does that constitute careless or negligent?

I would contend, most anything that happens in a car, can be ignored (i.e. kids fighting, cell phone, dropped cigarette lighter, etc.) and given our world NOW, all the above would be negligence if you act to remedy and cause an accident.
Well - texting and driving is illegal in MN. Calming your kids, eating ect. is not so I’d say one is Grossly negligent and the others may not quite raise to that level.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HKI
Friday afternoon on my way through KC, I waited behind a BMW SUV that was stopped on the on-ramp, waiting for traffic to clear to merge...while texting.

It’s absolutely ridiculous, and most of the worst offenders are in late-model vehicles with obvious blue-tooth technology. Get off your damn phones.
 
Well - texting and driving is illegal in MN. Calming your kids, eating ect. is not so I’d say one is Grossly negligent and the others may not quite raise to that level.

There lies the hypothetical, she said she wasn’t texting; merely retrieving phone. Seems definitions need expanded and/or clarified. Shouldn’t distracted driving or negligence be one in the same?
 
Friday afternoon on my way through KC, I waited behind a BMW SUV that was stopped on the on-ramp, waiting for traffic to clear to merge...while texting.

It’s absolutely ridiculous, and most of the worst offenders are in late-model vehicles with obvious blue-tooth technology. Get off your damn phones.

You hate nice cars, brah?
 
There lies the hypothetical, she said she wasn’t texting; merely retrieving phone. Seems definitions need expanded and/or clarified. Shouldn’t distracted driving or negligence be one in the same?
I get what you are saying and that’s why they need to prove gross negligence vs simple negligence, which I am guessing includes distracted driving. If what she was doing does indeed fit into the definition of texting, I think it should be gross negligence. But if they can’t prove she was texting, or doing anything else that is actually illegal, I’m guessing she gets off with a lesser crime
 
I wait until I’m on straight aways and no one is with a couple hundred feet of me. I hold it up above the steering wheel so my eyes are averted down.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HKI
Friday afternoon on my way through KC, I waited behind a BMW SUV that was stopped on the on-ramp, waiting for traffic to clear to merge...while texting.

It’s absolutely ridiculous, and most of the worst offenders are in late-model vehicles with obvious blue-tooth technology. Get off your damn phones.

How do you know they’re texting?

While Bluetooth will broadcast the audio to your car speakers, I don’t think it can select the next porn video you’d like to watch while driving.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HKI and jellyfish10
When you look at a text, that is technically texting, correct? She did not reply to the text, but she looked at her phone to read the text, which to me is texting and driving.

From the article:

The defense and prosecuting attorneys now trying Xiong’s criminal vehicular homicide case don’t dispute that Xiong had just looked at a short text message — it said “Okay” — before the crash and was trying to place her phone on the dashboard when she accidentally dropped it.
Again, her reading the word "Okay" didn't cause the crash. Her trying to pick her phone up off the car floor while driving caused the crash.

That could just as easily have happened if she was trying to pick up a pack of gum or a bottle of water or a tube of lipstick off the floor.
 
How do you know they’re texting?

While Bluetooth will broadcast the audio to your car speakers, I don’t think it can select the next porn video you’d like to watch while driving.

Head down, phone in hands, fingers moving on the phone screen, but I suppose they could just be playing angry birds.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HKI
This brings back bad memories for me. Ironically the same day. My wife and 3 daughters were traveling back from a wedding the day before. At 11:16 am I got a call at work from my oldest daughter. She informed me that they were involved in a bad accident. I left work immediatly and drove from Iowa City to Waterloo, accident was just West of Waverly. A 20 year old girl pulled out from a side street onto a 4 lane divided highway in front of my family traveling 65 mph. Thankfully everyone survived. My wife has had 2 reconstructive surgeries on her right ankle. Oldest has permanent nerve damage in her lower left leg. Middle has had 2 surgeries, 1 on her right ankle and on her right wrist. Youngest should be driving, but is still going through PTSD couseling. We are still waiting to settle with the 20 year old's insurance company. Our attorney has obtained the 20 year old's cell record. She was texting at the time she pulled out. Please put the mother F#$%ing phone down!!!!! It's not that important to not wait til you are off the road and parked.
 
The discussion over texting and driving always reminds me of the Cereal Defense episode in "It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia" where Frank rear ends Dennis, who was eating a bowl of cereal while driving, so the gang holds a trial, then goes out and replicates what happened...

The moral of the story is that, anything urgent that needs to be done, whether it's directions, texting, or eating cereal, can be done at the next light or stop sign.
Also here's a video of part of the trial, just because it's hilarious.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ThorneStockton
This brings back bad memories for me. Ironically the same day. My wife and 3 daughters were traveling back from a wedding the day before. At 11:16 am I got a call at work from my oldest daughter. She informed me that they were involved in a bad accident. I left work immediatly and drove from Iowa City to Waterloo, accident was just West of Waverly. A 20 year old girl pulled out from a side street onto a 4 lane divided highway in front of my family traveling 65 mph. Thankfully everyone survived. My wife has had 2 reconstructive surgeries on her right ankle. Oldest has permanent nerve damage in her lower left leg. Middle has had 2 surgeries, 1 on her right ankle and on her right wrist. Youngest should be driving, but is still going through PTSD couseling. We are still waiting to settle with the 20 year old's insurance company. Our attorney has obtained the 20 year old's cell record. She was texting at the time she pulled out. Please put the mother F#$%ing phone down!!!!! It's not that important to not wait til you are off the road and parked.
Sorry that happened to you and your family man. Glad everybody was relatively "okay"
 
  • Like
Reactions: reesehawk
I have my phone connected to my Bluetooth, so when I get a text I can have it read to me through my car speakers. I cannot reply though unless I'm stopped and in park.

I think driving and texting is an ultimate act of selfishness.
 
Hypothetical- The driver that initiated the crash had already picked up her 3 kids. They're fighting. She turns around to see who's doing what, etc. Same set of events occur as when she went to retrieve her phone. Does that constitute careless or negligent?

I would contend, most anything that happens in a car, can be ignored (i.e. kids fighting, cell phone, dropped cigarette lighter, etc.) and given our world NOW, all the above would be negligence if you act to remedy and cause an accident.

she definitely gets ticketed for inattentive driving, for starters

and then the evidence goes to the country prosecutor to see if any crimes were committed

Crazy that the gal was not even sure if she applied the brakes before the crash.

From the story:

Xiong, who lives in Hudson with her family, later told police she could not recall if she braked before smashing into their vehicle. Drivers of both the other vehicles involved said they had been at a complete stop when the collision occurred.
 
Well - texting and driving is illegal in MN. Calming your kids, eating ect. is not so I’d say one is Grossly negligent and the others may not quite raise to that level.
is it still texting when she went to place her phone down, it dropped and she went to retrieve it? One thing for sure: texting and not being able to put the smart phone down started the whole chain of events

not sure if the prosecutor is going after texting and driving or not
 
Again, her reading the word "Okay" didn't cause the crash. Her trying to pick her phone up off the car floor while driving caused the crash.

That could just as easily have happened if she was trying to pick up a pack of gum or a bottle of water or a tube of lipstick off the floor.
I see your point; but the text started the whole chain of events and texting and driving is illegal in MN.

Either way, its inattentive driving where the driver was not even sure if she applied the brakes before impact.

Seriously, if she does not know if she applied the brakes, how attentive to driving was she?

I think she is in serious trouble here.

I think this is why your insurance company says to not admit to anything.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT