RE: Illinois -
Obviously Brett knows how to win in the B1G. He's already gotten Illinois above where Lovie had built them ... AND he's known to be a much better recruiter too.
Also, the Illini return quite a good group of WRs, they have a decent TE, and their back-up RBs were pretty good too. On top of that, they didn't lose a ton on the OL. The "biggest" hole that the Illini had on the roster was at QB ... but they also brought in 2 transfers in order to help fill that void.
The only REAL question for the Illini on O is how much will the loss of all-everything RB, Chase Brown, be felt?
On defense, things maybe get a little murkier. First off, they lost their DC ... so how much of a mark will that make? Furthermore, they lost quite a bit from the secondary (and a few guys from the front-7 too). Will we be looking at a transition for the Illini on the defensive end? ... or, will we see something more akin to what we saw at Wisconsin ... where they burned through 3 different DC's, and the defense remained elite the entire time?
RE: Purdue -
First off ... out goes offensive mastermind, Jeff Brohm ... now enters defensive mastermind, Ryan Walters.
Of course, on O, Purdue lost their top QB, their top WR, and their top TE ... so there were some personnel losses to accompany the loss of Brohm's offensive mind. What the Purdue O does possess however, is a promising former walk-on RB in Mockobee. Otherwise, I'm pretty clueless about what to expect from the Purdue O. I will say that I expect there to be some growing pains there.
The stranger issue might just prove to be the Purdue defense. They lost 3 of their top defensive linemen to the transfer portal. Furthermore, since Walters is a defensive-minded coach ... there will invariably be the installation of a new D for the Boilermakers. In the long run, I'd expect the Purdue defense to take steps forward ... however, in the short-run, I could definitely see there being a bit of a transition on D in year one. Part of this transition occurring both due to personnel fluctuations AND schematic changes.
Conclusions:
Given the changes at Illinois, they'll probably remain pretty level. The implication being that they will likely be competing at the top of the B1G west. I don't see them taking steps forward ... nor do I necessarily see them taking steps backward. The game against them should be a tough out. It is POSSIBLE that if one of the new QBs proves to be a wunderkind ... they have the personnel on O to potentially take steps forward.
Given the changes at Purdue, I cannot help but to think that they take a few steps backward. Will it be a de-evolution to the period prior to Brohm? That I doubt ... Walters seems too sharp to let that happen. However, we'll have to see how good of a delegator Walters is as the head-honcho.
If the inferences drawn above are correct ... then what are the implications for the Hawks? Certainly, if Iowa can actually field a competent O ... we'll remain toward the top of the B1G west. Heck, even without an O over the past 2 years ... we won the West once and almost won it a 2nd time.
With Purdue likely dropping some (at least in the short-term) ... does this create a power vacuum? Even despite the change in staff ... does Wisconsin take advantage? Can they? How about Minnesota? As much as we all like to hate on PJ Fleck, all he continues to prove is that he can coach the game of football ... and do so at a pretty high level. Of course, fortunately, he also regularly seems to prove the ability to shart his pants when playing against Kirk and Phil ... to the Hawks great benefit. Will '23 be the year when the might boat-rowers finally get the best of the fighting Ferentz's?
Obviously Brett knows how to win in the B1G. He's already gotten Illinois above where Lovie had built them ... AND he's known to be a much better recruiter too.
Also, the Illini return quite a good group of WRs, they have a decent TE, and their back-up RBs were pretty good too. On top of that, they didn't lose a ton on the OL. The "biggest" hole that the Illini had on the roster was at QB ... but they also brought in 2 transfers in order to help fill that void.
The only REAL question for the Illini on O is how much will the loss of all-everything RB, Chase Brown, be felt?
On defense, things maybe get a little murkier. First off, they lost their DC ... so how much of a mark will that make? Furthermore, they lost quite a bit from the secondary (and a few guys from the front-7 too). Will we be looking at a transition for the Illini on the defensive end? ... or, will we see something more akin to what we saw at Wisconsin ... where they burned through 3 different DC's, and the defense remained elite the entire time?
RE: Purdue -
First off ... out goes offensive mastermind, Jeff Brohm ... now enters defensive mastermind, Ryan Walters.
Of course, on O, Purdue lost their top QB, their top WR, and their top TE ... so there were some personnel losses to accompany the loss of Brohm's offensive mind. What the Purdue O does possess however, is a promising former walk-on RB in Mockobee. Otherwise, I'm pretty clueless about what to expect from the Purdue O. I will say that I expect there to be some growing pains there.
The stranger issue might just prove to be the Purdue defense. They lost 3 of their top defensive linemen to the transfer portal. Furthermore, since Walters is a defensive-minded coach ... there will invariably be the installation of a new D for the Boilermakers. In the long run, I'd expect the Purdue defense to take steps forward ... however, in the short-run, I could definitely see there being a bit of a transition on D in year one. Part of this transition occurring both due to personnel fluctuations AND schematic changes.
Conclusions:
Given the changes at Illinois, they'll probably remain pretty level. The implication being that they will likely be competing at the top of the B1G west. I don't see them taking steps forward ... nor do I necessarily see them taking steps backward. The game against them should be a tough out. It is POSSIBLE that if one of the new QBs proves to be a wunderkind ... they have the personnel on O to potentially take steps forward.
Given the changes at Purdue, I cannot help but to think that they take a few steps backward. Will it be a de-evolution to the period prior to Brohm? That I doubt ... Walters seems too sharp to let that happen. However, we'll have to see how good of a delegator Walters is as the head-honcho.
If the inferences drawn above are correct ... then what are the implications for the Hawks? Certainly, if Iowa can actually field a competent O ... we'll remain toward the top of the B1G west. Heck, even without an O over the past 2 years ... we won the West once and almost won it a 2nd time.
With Purdue likely dropping some (at least in the short-term) ... does this create a power vacuum? Even despite the change in staff ... does Wisconsin take advantage? Can they? How about Minnesota? As much as we all like to hate on PJ Fleck, all he continues to prove is that he can coach the game of football ... and do so at a pretty high level. Of course, fortunately, he also regularly seems to prove the ability to shart his pants when playing against Kirk and Phil ... to the Hawks great benefit. Will '23 be the year when the might boat-rowers finally get the best of the fighting Ferentz's?