ADVERTISEMENT

Voter suppression on the way

Do you consider aking for id at voting location to be suppression?

Can you point to ANY instance of a Voter ID preventing fraud?
Because >90% of the fraud cases have NOT involved anything related to IDs.

Require eligibility verification at registration time, NOT poll time.
 
If,Republicans proposed a national voter registration database that was adequately funded along with the funds to ensure that everyone had reasonable access to a polling station we could talk about id
 
If,Republicans proposed a national voter registration database that was adequately funded along with the funds to ensure that everyone had reasonable access to a polling station we could talk about id

Those issues are handled by county auditors and Secretary's of state for each state. Are you saying you want yet another federal government office? Expanding the size of federal government will not help problems with voting.
 
If,Republicans proposed a national voter registration database that was adequately funded along with the funds to ensure that everyone had reasonable access to a polling station we could talk about id

Don't people already have adequate access to a polling station? And what does a voter ID have to do wit h that?

I've heard arguments that people won't be able to afford the ID or that they won't be able to drive or get transportation to get one. But if the argument is that voter IDs would suppress the vote, that means you're saying people would have transportation tot he polling places but not to get a voter ID?
 
  • Like
Reactions: anon_8rcdnbko1jbe0
Hispanics don't vote period, and black folks only vote for obama { according to lib logic} so are you guys talking about suppressing Asians?
 
The Republican Party is getting older and whiter. The options option to them are become inclusive, or restrict voting.

Myth.

The GOP is getting less white over time, just more slowly than the Dems.

1_1-1.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: ottumwan in tx
except when the ID's are free

They're never "free".

How will the GOP laws handle 'changes of address'? New ID needed? ID invalid?
Because LOTS of people change addresses ~annually when they rent or work seasonally.

That means you could EASILY have a "Voter ID" in 2 jurisdictions, meaning you can STILL commit fraud. Just like snowbirds who have properties in 2 states (and they HAVE caught people registered in both locations btw)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Menace Sockeyes
They're never "free".

How will the GOP laws handle 'changes of address'? New ID needed? ID invalid?
Because LOTS of people change addresses ~annually when they rent or work seasonally.

That means you could EASILY have a "Voter ID" in 2 jurisdictions, meaning you can STILL commit fraud. Just like snowbirds who have properties in 2 states (and they HAVE caught people registered in both locations btw)
in texas you can use your water bill with your address on it and stuff, to verify. you seem to know a lot about voting twice!
 
dems had ghosts vote, aliens from mars, aliens from mexico, dogs, dead dogs, dead people, Canadians, all vote and vote twice.... and hills still lost
 
They're talking about free IDs. Connect those dots.

'Talking About' isn't the same as 'legislatin'.

We have yet to find virtually ANY voter fraud related to voter IDs, so it seems like a solution in search of a problem.

Kind of like the way Dems like to jump on the 'gun law restrictions' after every shooting, despite the laws they want to change having zero impact on the circumstances surrounding the actual shooting.

That is how you discern "actual legislation which may make a difference" from "political talking points". Just sayin'
 
'Talking About' isn't the same as 'legislatin'.

We have yet to find virtually ANY voter fraud related to voter IDs, so it seems like a solution in search of a problem.

Kind of like the way Dems like to jump on the 'gun law restrictions' after every shooting, despite the laws they want to change having zero impact on the circumstances surrounding the actual shooting.

That is how you discern "actual legislation which may make a difference" from "political talking points". Just sayin'

What are you afraid of?
 
What are you afraid of?

Disenfranchising 10x to 100x more voters than cases of "Voter ID fraud".

Precisely the same as denying 100x more people of their legal gun ownership rights to pass a law which will have zero impact on gun crimes.
 
Disenfranchising 10x to 100x more voters than cases of "Voter ID fraud".

Precisely the same as denying 100x more people of their legal gun ownership rights to pass a law which will have zero impact on gun crimes.

How is that going to happen?
 
How is that going to happen?

Already happened in NC, where a judge determined they attempted to suppress minorities with "surgical precision". Show us a legitimate study where "voter impersonation fraud" exists in reasonably high (>0.1%) numbers. THEN we can determine laws for IDs to address those 'fraud methods'.

If you are 'for' Voter IDs for nonexistent fraud, then you MUST ALSO favor for gun bans/laws which will likewise not impact gun violence/shootings. They are essentially the same thing: political talking points.
 
  • Like
Reactions: artradley
What are you afraid of?

What I'm afraid of is a whole set of changes besides voter ID's. Some of them dedicated to making it more difficult to obtain an ID, some of which can be totally unrelated to voter ID's but still cast under the umbrella of "vote fraud prevention"; such as what we saw in North Carolina, where the legislatures made several changes to voting access that were specifically designed to lower the number of black voters.

It is clear that the GOP's strategy is to claim there is widespread voter fraud, then use that as a pretense to pass law after law designed specifically to pass constitutional muster while nonetheless decreasing minority voters. To pretend that isn't the motivation behind almost all of this is insulting.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cohawk
If you move to require an id and then also shut down dmv offices in minority areas, then yes, it is suppression. Alabama is not the only state that attempted to do this. Think what you may, but the R's will do anything they can to reduce minority voting.

https://thinkprogress.org/after-ala...ies-lawmaker-wants-investigation-94de2c4a5dd9

This is the key. After getting Americans to buy-off on the innocuous sounding voter ID requirement, the GOP will predictably take measures to make it difficult for minorities to get those ID's. This is observably true.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT