ADVERTISEMENT

WBB Transfer Portal Targets 2025-2026 (Updated 5/21/25)

Let's just go get Williams from Wisky.
In the last 2 games, I thought the UW bigs were terrible at post defense. Although Iowa missed some bunnies and a couple shots were blocked, the Iowa players were able to get deep position on a regular basis.

Between Stuelke, Heiden, Mallegni and Hayes, I think they will be OK at 4 and 5.

The wild card is Guyton. Some concern that she may leave no matter what, based on her Dad. If we brought in a portal PG, her chances of leaving increase.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ddeanHawk
In the last 2 games, I thought the UW bigs were terrible at post defense. Although Iowa missed some bunnies and a couple shots were blocked, the Iowa players were able to get deep position on a regular basis.

Between Stuelke, Heiden, Mallegni and Hayes, I think they will be OK at 4 and 5.

The wild card is Guyton. Some concern that she may leave no matter what, based on her Dad. If we brought in a portal PG, her chances of leaving increase.
Concern based on nothing but posts like this perpetuating concern.
 
Yes, the Read and React offense is not the best fit for 3 out and 2 in. It was mainly designed primarily for 5 out, then they added 4 out and one in and that's what we mostly run now. One of the main purposes of R&R is to open up lanes for quick cuts and driving with the 5 out. Having 2 in just about kills the spacing needed to execute these backcuts or drives effectively.

I agree with everything you said, but need more clarity on what I highlighted in your response above. Guess what I'm asking is, who are you including on this list of guards?
Guyton- Okay at beating her player and getting into the paint, but often doesn't know what to do with the ball once she does. Hopefully she'll improve her decision-making with time.

McCabe- Doesn't really drive to the basket ever. She's only attempted 11 two-point field goals all season and 21 in her career.

Stremlow- Doesn't attack the basket a ton. Isn't quick for a guard so it'll be tough to improve her driving.

Levin/Johnson- We haven't seen enough of either to judge.

Deal/Houston- Haven't seen them at the college level, so I wasn't including them in the comment.
 
Hard to believe Guyton would want to leave given the fact that she is in line to play a key role for the next three years. Her opportunities at Iowa would be hard to beat. That, plus fan support, and probable NIL money are additional pluses. Irrational decision if she leaves. (She is already a fan favorite!)
 
Concern based on nothing but posts like this perpetuating concern.
I'll admit to being purely speculative... I thought her dad had been somewhat of a helicopter parent, and there were a couple of instances where I thought Guyton looked pretty upset about being pulled out of the game. If I am way off base, I will be very happy, as I think Guyton has the chance to be special.
 
Yes, but it hasn't stopped anyone from doing so.

I do think waiting for announced transfers leads to better analysis, though. After Clark's junior year everyone wanted Iowa to get a transfer 5. Problem was, the only transfer 5 better than Iowa had on roster was Lauren Betts and she didn't want to come to Iowa.

Every now and then I still see online comments saying Iowa would've won a championship last year if it had only gotten a transfer 5. I wish more people realized the portal doesn't always have upgrades, especially for elite teams.

Bing-effing-O….I found that bottom battle in the game thread all last season, along with Gabby Marshall needs to sit on the bench and Taylor McCabe needs to play more. It’s also why I have quite a bit of hostility sometimes towards “those fans”…

Iowa played about as fast and loose as they possibly could last year and I’m not sure there was a center in the nation, including Megan Guftason or Monica Cziano that was going to facilitate what we needed. I said over and over and over again last year’s team was better than the one the year before they rebounded better, They played defense better and they were more streamlined. Yes a center might have helped in that South Carolina game, but it might’ve kept us from getting there too….

In my humble opinion, the biggest majority of fans really have no clue what they’re seeing and don’t take the time to discourse with people to the point that they understand. They are all reactionary and use basic logic concepts to form their opinion.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ZachJump
Hard to believe Guyton would want to leave given the fact that she is in line to play a key role for the next three years. Her opportunities at Iowa would be hard to beat. That, plus fan support, and probable NIL money are additional pluses. Irrational decision if she leaves. (She is already a fan favorite!)

Are we on this again? Is there new info out there or just regurgitating the old news. And no I’m not being an ass, sincerely asking
 
Right, what do you think some people are like that?
I don't know. I suppose it dovetails with a "hey, girl, you should smile more" mentality, but Aaliyah smiles plenty. Saw another comment that said Aaliyah only posts videos of herself, and that person ran with the idea that she had no friends. Huh?! People read this stuff and form a repeated narrative based on somebody that imagined something into existence. It's sad, but par for the course with the "truth creation" bs in the current era.

There is also some Chicken Little mentality that presumes a transfer in the program would be a catastrophe. Not seeing that problem. Iowa isn't a stepping stone these days.

Anyone that watched the podcast with her father after the Oregon loss gets a better grip.

The reality of Guyton's play on the court has been one of development. She has good moments mixed with some mistakes. Hard to know where her ceiling is after year one, but we do know she has been given lots of minutes and time to do what she can in this season after injury. ---->Looking forward to what she can do in the tournaments.
 
I don't know. I suppose it dovetails with a "hey, girl, you should smile more" mentality, but Aaliyah smiles plenty. Saw another comment that said Aaliyah only posts videos of herself, and that person ran with the idea that she had no friends. Huh?! People read this stuff and form a repeated narrative based on somebody that imagined something into existence. It's sad, but par for the course with the "truth creation" bs in the current era.

There is also some Chicken Little mentality that presumes a transfer in the program would be a catastrophe. Not seeing that problem. Iowa isn't a stepping stone these days.

Anyone that watched the podcast with her father after the Oregon loss gets a better grip.

The reality of Guyton's play on the court has been one of development. She has good moments mixed with some mistakes. Hard to know where her ceiling is after year one, but we do know she has been given lots of minutes and time to do what she can in this season after injury. ---->Looking forward to what she can do in the tournaments.


Yes, what people read into certain scenarios is literally baffling to me. I see what they say about certain incidents & think how the hell did you read “that” into existence or even, why would “that” be the first logic leap you took?!

Some of it, as you alluded to, is a fatalistic attitude…usually to temper disappointment, I suppose. But some of it is so petty and ridiculous like “smiling during a game you’re losing” means you don’t care enough….What the holy hell?!

Mostly in life, you have to have some confidence that things will ebb and flow and you’re going to ultimately come out in the end… But hell fans leap to conclusions minute by minute
 
  • Like
Reactions: citizenHawk
There are a lot of people that just have to think negatively or worry about things that are unlikely to happen.

Well as you notice I get loads of shit in here for saying things lots of us think. Now to be fair I try to make people feel as stupid as possible…..🤪

I do love it though when someone acts like they’re just pleasantly disagreeing with the coaches decisions 😂😂😂

Most of these cats couldn’t find their ass w/both hands.
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
Reactions: oldhawk56
Yes, what people read into certain scenarios is literally baffling to me. I see what they say about certain incidents & think how the hell did you read “that” into existence or even, why would “that” be the first logic leap you took?!

Some of it, as you alluded to, is a fatalistic attitude…usually to temper disappointment, I suppose. But some of it is so petty and ridiculous like “smiling during a game you’re losing” means you don’t care enough….What the holy hell?!

Mostly in life, you have to have some confidence that things will ebb and flow and you’re going to ultimately come out in the end… But hell fans leap to conclusions minute by minute
Completely agree. I look at it this way. One of the long term benefits of bringing in Lucy Olson was that Guyton saw firsthand in practice, games, and offcourt activities what is required to be a true first team all BIG guard. Mix that with substantial freshman playing time and the coaching staff will give her all the tools necessary for Guyton to take her game to that level.

Does she have that ceiling in her? We'll find out. If we bring in a transfer PG I would imagine JJ only does so if it's another first team BIG type of talent. In which case Guyton will have another excellent barometer to gauge her improvement before getting to challenge Harping for the starting PG spot in 2026. Then Harping will then be the benefactor from this competition cycle going back to this year with Olson. I don't think JJ will offer any player who doesn't buy-in to this mentality.

As a Slight Aside:
Coaches can preach 7 days a week about work. That preaching only has so much influence. We all know CC trains and practices at an elite level. CC's now established practice @iowa (that Guyton & all freshmen benefit from experiencing) and reinforced by CC when she does random practices with the team is one of those critical aspects of "culture" needed to be a consistently great programs. Couple that with JJ 1) identifying the right players & 2) step-wise improvements in recruiting? That's the recipe for becoming consistently good to consistently great. Once a program becomes consistently great for a sufficient period of time? Then it becomes a positive feedback loop in recruiting. At that point the coaches' job is to not F it up. That's a blue blood, IMO. Getting to that positive feedback loop requires luck. Good thing we already got some when CC chose Iowa.

Edit: this is not meant to downplay the standards or contributions to the players who came before CC. Obviously, that's part of it too.
 
Completely agree. I look at it this way. One of the long term benefits of bringing in Lucy Olson was that Guyton saw firsthand in practice, games, and offcourt activities what is required to be a true first team all BIG guard. Mix that with substantial freshman playing time and the coaching staff will give her all the tools necessary for Guyton to take her game to that level.

Does she have that ceiling in her? We'll find out. If we bring in a transfer PG I would imagine JJ only does so if it's another first team BIG type of talent. In which case Guyton will have another excellent barometer to gauge her improvement before getting to challenge Harping for the starting PG spot in 2026. Then Harping will then be the benefactor from this competition cycle going back to this year with Olson. I don't think JJ will offer any player who doesn't buy-in to this mentality.

As a Slight Aside:
Coaches can preach 7 days a week about work. That preaching only has so much influence. We all know CC trains and practices at an elite level. CC's now established practice @iowa (that Guyton & all freshmen benefit from experiencing) and reinforced by CC when she does random practices with the team is one of those critical aspects of "culture" needed to be a consistently great programs. Couple that with JJ 1) identifying the right players & 2) step-wise improvements in recruiting? That's the recipe for becoming consistently good to consistently great. Once a program becomes consistently great for a sufficient period of time? Then it becomes a positive feedback loop in recruiting. At that point the coaches' job is to not F it up. That's a blue blood, IMO. Getting to that positive feedback loop requires luck. Good thing we already got some when CC chose Iowa.

Edit: this is not meant to downplay the standards or contributions to the players who came before CC. Obviously, that's part of it too.

Enjoyed your perspective, but Harpring? I hope yo are right, but as the old saying goes, don't count your commitments before they're hatched. :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: citizenHawk
Bing-effing-O….I found that bottom battle in the game thread all last season, along with Gabby Marshall needs to sit on the bench and Taylor McCabe needs to play more. It’s also why I have quite a bit of hostility sometimes towards “those fans”…

Iowa played about as fast and loose as they possibly could last year and I’m not sure there was a center in the nation, including Megan Guftason or Monica Cziano that was going to facilitate what we needed. I said over and over and over again last year’s team was better than the one the year before they rebounded better, They played defense better and they were more streamlined. Yes a center might have helped in that South Carolina game, but it might’ve kept us from getting there too….

In my humble opinion, the biggest majority of fans really have no clue what they’re seeing and don’t take the time to discourse with people to the point that they understand. They are all reactionary and use basic logic concepts to form their opinion.
Agree, but it seems like the next few years will involve more post play with the 2 bigs that we will have. I don't think they can play fast. I love the high scoring games; I think that sets us apart and makes us attractive to many high-end recruits.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Torg and cmhawks99


Don’t think will happen with Guyton here.

I could see a senior to help before bringing in someone from the same class.
Delaney Gibb is a star.
Guyton does not impress me with her skills even considering shes coming off the ACL. Guyton doesnt have the "IT" factor and is
likely a better role player then franchise player.
Gibb is a difference maker. And shes already shown this.

Also I would love to see interest in another scorer ... Meagan McCowan Western Illinois
What a young player who again ... is a proven scorer. If you score you score. Does not matter what conference. The Skills are there.
She did go into portal last year as a freshmen but returned to WIU.

Lets find the scorer for next season... which is a big discussion topic always in the forum.
 
If we look to the portal to fill a need, e.g. Lucy, that's one thing. If we go to the portal to upgrade, than we're playing hard ball with our recruits. Live by the sword, die by the sword. Good luck.
 
Iowa WBB does need a proven scorer—someone who can create a shot.
I guess we disagree on what a "need" is. We have scorers and Addie Deal is coming in. IMO you're wanting an upgrade.
 
I hope that Hays is a quick learner and can help out later in the season. Lack of a veteran PG is a concern.
 
If we look to the portal to fill a need, e.g. Lucy, that's one thing. If we go to the portal to upgrade, than we're playing hard ball with our recruits. Live by the sword, die by the sword. Good luck.
How is that any different than pursuing incoming freshman that are likely (or obviously) upgrades? At this point in time, there isn't a proven reliable scorer on the team for next year. "Developmental" is a tough needle to thread when other programs are stacking rosters, or starting freshmen that are making big waves in the conference. Nevermind the faith required in your own roster buying-in and staying.

I love the freshmen, but the current recruits they are after will/would likely be the keys to any future high level success.

They really need a reliable scorer for next year to maintain momentum. That might mean some growing pain. I'd give Delaney Gibb a call.
 
How is that any different than pursuing incoming freshman that are likely (or obviously) upgrades? At this point in time, there isn't a proven reliable scorer on the team for next year. "Developmental" is a tough needle to thread when other programs are stacking rosters, or starting freshmen that are making big waves in the conference. Nevermind the faith required in your own roster buying-in and staying.

I love the freshmen, but the current recruits they are after will/would likely be the keys to any future high level success.

They really need a reliable scorer for next year to maintain momentum. That might mean some growing pain. I'd give Delaney Gibb a call.

We have Guyton, McCabe, Deal, and Houston, do we need Gibb?
 
  • Wow
Reactions: HIWILLE
We have Guyton, McCabe, Deal, and Houston, do we need Gibb?

Houston is likely more of a forward for us and the only one of those people who would stop me from pursuing Gibb is Deal. There is no reason Guyton needs to be just handed a starting spot if they can find a better player, she was not anything special once she stopped hitting like 70% of her 3s.
 
We have Guyton, McCabe, Deal, and Houston, do we need Gibb?
When you put it that way, I'd say yes. We are banking on Deal coming in and putting up points, but expecting her to be the main ball handler is asking a lot of a freshman. Of the other players, there isn't one there that we can count on to put up double digit points. 2-6 points will be entirely unacceptable. Without Lucy, Syd, and Kylie, this current team wasn't going to win any games last week.

The issue, of course, with regard to Gibb, she would be joining our '24 class, where a '22 or '23 would be ideal. That may bring some roster complication overloading that class. I think something like that would depend on your confidence level with the '26 recruits. If they are all-in with those player/s coming, it very well might mean you can really only look at senior PGs in the portal.

If Iowa wants to compete with the upper half of the conference, they will have to keep up. USC will keep reloading a team around Juju (I'd guess they might want Williams from Wisconsin), Betts and Rice return, etc. I just don't think Iowa can count on a big level-up over the summer. Maybe some, but how much?
 
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: hahkize and HIWILLE
Guyton reminds me of Joe Toussaint in that she can do some things incredibly well, but her skill set and court sense are less than the sum of their parts. I'm not sure she can quarterback a championship offense for 30 minutes per game.
I think Guyton would be really good in the Gabbie Marshall role as a 2. Focus on defense first and hit the open threes when you get them. Be an option for ball-handling, but not the primary decisionmaker.

Problem is, I'm not sure Iowa will have the luxury of using her in that role.
 
The Wisconsin coach has resigned. Serah Williams, please come to Iowa City.
Very unlikely as she's from the east coast. More likely destinations if she leaves the Badgers would be Maryland/Ohio St in the Big10 and possibly UConn, Duke, NC State, North Car. Would love to get her but I just don't see that happening.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HIWILLE
Right now JuJu is the only BIG player averaging more than 20.

Hoping that Deal can come in as a freshman and being 20+ is extremely optimistic
It is, but Deal was rated around top 10 at times and I think now 18th? She plays on one of the best teams in the country against serious competiton.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hawksbyamillion
It is, but Deal was rated around top 10 at times and I think now 18th? She plays on one of the best teams in the country against serious competiton.

Most top 10 recruits also don't average 20 a game. Cambridge and Syla Swords were top 5 recruits and just averaged 15 and 16 PPG, respectively. If Deal does something in the mid-teens as a true freshman she had a phenomenal year.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT