Are you one of the 20% of Democrats who agree with the 43% of Republicans?
"Is there any situation" is a pretty broad scope to look at.
There will be more probes... perhaps the Clinton Foundation, maybe something to do with Foster, or something about some scandal in New York State in her time as Senator. Best one might have to do with the conspiracy theory that Trump was in the race as a favor to the Clintons... forcing the remaining candidates to shift even farther right to alienate Independents.
See, Rs are twice as dangerous. Vote D for sanity and safety.Are you one of the 20% of Democrats who agree with the 43% of Republicans?
"Is there any situation" is a pretty broad scope to look at.
Could you point me in the direction of your referance to W admitting it was Cheney's fault?
Its half that of Rs, look at the data. You don't have to be crazy to be an R, but if you are crazy, you're likely to find a welcome home in the R party.
Do you really believe that? You really think that Bush Jr, wasn't onboard with it? The son of Bush Sr. wasn't wanting what happened in the last two wars?
Delusional. Absolutely delusional. Explain TPP, Freedom Act, multiple Patriot Act extensions, NDAA, Gitmo still being open, drone bombing schools, selling out to Wall Street, failure to punish the big banks, selling out to the the HMO's, rising racial tensions, ramping up NSA spying powers, CISA, refusal to address the drug war and discriminatory sentencing, siding with big oil on the energy debates, expansion of ground troops into several new and different countries, etc, etc.
None of that means Rs aren't twice as bad. Read the dats point in the graph above.
I'm hardly shocked you want to ignore data to hold to your position. You must be a Ben Carson fan.
I suck at links... Google "Bush comments on Cheney and Rumsfeld" and you'll get comments from Bush1 and Bush2. I think it is excerpts from an autobiography. Sorry to make that complicated!
I know 43% is a lot but you and Jscott seem to ignore that 20% Dems and 29% of independents feel the same way. The question was worded to get the result it wanted.
Who is ignoring anything? 43% is about twice 20%. As the article points out, both groups have crazy elements but Rs have way more. They are not equally sane.
It would neutralize the point. The point in reality is that they are not. Politics is a team sport. One team is clearly more crazy and dangerous than the other. So at the end of the day it doesn't really matter how you personally feel about a particular issue or candidate. What matters is keeping power out of the hands of the crazy team. The only way to do that in the American system is to vote D. It's very simple, stark and straightforward.
I would be interested in what your answer would be to the question I asked above.
Congratulations you are part of the 43%.
I know it would be really convenient for you if that had been the question, but it wasn't. The question clearly gave them the outcome of the military taking over the powers of the federal government and nearly half of your team thought a military dictatorship was good.
When you leave a question as open ended as that one then you can't trust the answers. You read it one way I read it another.
Except the question wasn't open ended, the ending was clear; the military taking over the federal powers. But if you don't like that data point, there are dozens more where Rs display a much greater propensity for insanity than their D counterparts. The article references a few.
