Didn’t expect you to admit you were wrong even when so clearly are.
Never will. He's pot committed at this point.
Interesting take.
Great, we've heard from another idiot who's never filled out a death certificate or taken a class in public health.
We have your useless opinion might as well get someone more creditable like Oscar.
You'd have to ask him. I wish i wanted to know your warped reasoning for your question, but to be honest I don't really care. I'm sure you thought it was clever. It wasn't, but enjoy your self congratulatory pat on the back.
Uh doc….Dr Leana Wen wrote the op ed.
SMH. Read, then form an opinion. The byline. You’ll find it at the top of the article I linked.
Uh doc….Dr Leana Wen wrote the op ed.
I hope this isn’t representative of your attention to detail.
Wen, Leana S. | Milken Institute School of Public Health | The George Washington University
Leana S. Wen, MD, MSc Research Professor of Health Policy and Managementpublichealth.gwu.edu
Dr. Wen has biases? She's been on cnn since the pandemic began advocating for vaccines. There are many questioning the safety of vaccines, including her. You can be a scientist or a physician and still be critical.
You asked me a question. It was a non sequitur, but I'm courteous and responded. You're welcome.
This place is a joke concerning science and medicine. But it does offer endless humor.
I'm not a public health expert or epidemiologist but I work with the virus. Since day 1, I've lost track of how many variants we've grown. My reservations are on the vaccine itself. Ample data suggests the presence of tiny blood clots both in the brain and pulmonary vasculature. We see this in vaccinated individuals as well. Some evidence suggests that injected mRNA does not stay resident at local sites and goes to distal privileged sites, allowing for expression of the s protein epitope coded by the mRNA. This portion, in and of itself, might be toxic. Repeated dosing might just lead to stoking burning embers. Many scientists, myself included, are circumspect about these vaccines and endless booster shots. They aren't tic tacs. Sometimes it's good to step back and recalibrate things. Better vaccine approaches are desirable and treating people like idiots just because you might have an MD or PhD or both isn't justifiable. I thank you for your medical acumen but this forum is an echo chamber for the usual suspects. I think people deserve better. And if you trust Pfizer or Moderna, well what to say haha.
I appreciate you and JWolf’s perspective. I do think the virus isn’t as respected as it should be by the general public. I understand the pushback on vaccine mandates but I know a couple middle -aged, healthy people who’ve yet to recover from contracting COVID. A teacher friend of mine is still taking steroids and trying all kinds of different treatments just to be able to breathe normally again. And this is a fit guy who jogs and plays competitive tennis.
Accurate data is pretty important. If you actually want to learn anything from our response and how we can do better in the future.
Thank you. There are things you can take to beat covid available on Amazon. I don't post it because this place is basically a joke. And yes, there's data. The virus has nearly 30,000 base pairs of information. By comparison hiv-1 is about 9,500. You don't think it might have some tricks up its sleeve? Mother nature, unlike this place, isn't a buffoon.
Well, if you don’t mind, I’d be interested in what you would recommend. I’m a fairly healthy guy but when I get sick I tend to go down hard.
Sure accurate data is important
Good grief. Any argument against accurate data is a silly argument.
Yet you had a strong opinion about the article and conclusion of the article without reading it because it is behind a pay wall.
