The RPI didn’t work for basketball so they changed it and it seems to work better for them. Why does baseball not change as well? If you play a bad team and win your RPI might go down. Iowa Wednesday games doesn’t allow for much travel distance and with no really strong teams nearby hard to build up that RPI. So they better tear it up in the south in early Feb and March to build up the RPI. Problem is Iowa will be stuck inside for the 3 months before going south while southern teams have been outside practicing. Seeing a ball pitched on a bright sunny day, playing the wind in the outfield, or getting a ground ball in the grass infield, etc. are all going to be different for the northern teams for awhile. I hate excuses, but system doesn’t seem right. Sending 2 teams from big 10 last year was a joke. Iowa got screwed and Rutgers REALLY got screwed. With all that whining done
I’m very excited for this team. Good speed and some power, defense should be salty, and good pitching depth. This team looks good on paper and I hear chemistry is already very strong. I’m excited for the season. Go Hawks!
They did change the RPI for basketball, you are correct they pretty much dropped it. Mostly due to the way baseball and basketball is played. Basically the advanced metrics in basketball (such as the Pomeroy Rankings), which take into account offensive and defensive efficiency, give a much more accurate view of how good/bad a team is than RPI, which is just whether you won or lost, and the W/L record of the opponent and the opponent's opponents.
Very hard to do that in baseball, as baseball has much more potential randomness due to the nature of the game itself and how much variance there can be based on who the starting pitcher is in a baseball game. RPI is seriously flawed, but it is at least a metric of some sort. Otherwise, the tournament committee would be left to just putting in more southern teams "just because they are better" with no metrics to back it up with. They still do it to an extent. I am not sure the Big 10 deserved more than 2 teams last year, hate to say it. The conference just wasn't very good. Not a ton of OOC marquee wins. In Iowa's case, they lost a ton of close early games (A&m Corpus Christi, A&M, Wichita State (twice), UC-Irvine (2 of 3) to teams that mostly ended up not being very good. Wichita State ended up 21-36, Corpus Christi was 27-28 with a RPI of 185. A&M was very good (RPI of 8), but Iowa lost that game 7-3. UC Irvine, Iowa lost 2 of 3 to a team with a RPI of 87. Iowa also had some bad luck in that some of the non-conference wins against teams that have been good but weren't (Pepperdine, Washington State, San Diego State).
You are on point that much of Iowa's fate of getting in the NCAA tournament is determined in Feb and March when they go south. If you notice, the first series when Iowa goes south they play mostly other northern teams who are also going south, to be on a theoretical level playing field. First series this year in the Snowbird Classic includes 2 games against Indiana State and one against Quinnipiac, the games are in Port Charlotte, FL. Second series is against Sam Houston State, K-State and LSU in Round Rock, TX. LSU and Sam Houston for sure will have been outside a lot more than Iowa by that time, and likely K-State will have been as well. Third series against Southern, South Alabama and Pepperdine (games in Alabama), then the fourth series Iowa plays at Texas Tech in Lubbock. Those 12 games, like it or not, will determine if Iowa can realistically get an at-large berth with a good Big 10 season.