A
anon_i8nzeu2gbf0ba
Guest
I don't know when or where this started, but every time I hear an announcer or official refer to "the line to gain," I just about barf. Why has the language changed from the simple "first down"?
Anyone have an explanation?
Such language reeks of lawyers and politicians, thus the barfing tendency.
Can't these people just leave our sports alone? We used to know when somebody caught a pass and when they didn't. Now that can only be determined by pages of definitions that are still wide open to subjective interpretation and that defy common sense.
Slide into second base? Ooooh. That could be against the "rules." Try to make a tag at the plate, watch out, the lawyers are waiting.
Did that tackler "target" the offensive player? Did he commit "excessive celebration" while scoring a touchdown?
"Line to gain"? Gimme a break. It's all BS.
Anyone have an explanation?
Such language reeks of lawyers and politicians, thus the barfing tendency.
Can't these people just leave our sports alone? We used to know when somebody caught a pass and when they didn't. Now that can only be determined by pages of definitions that are still wide open to subjective interpretation and that defy common sense.
Slide into second base? Ooooh. That could be against the "rules." Try to make a tag at the plate, watch out, the lawyers are waiting.
Did that tackler "target" the offensive player? Did he commit "excessive celebration" while scoring a touchdown?
"Line to gain"? Gimme a break. It's all BS.