ADVERTISEMENT

Wheaton College suspends Christian professor who wore a hijab

cigaretteman

HB King
May 29, 2001
79,435
62,542
113
A tenured Wheaton College professor who, as part of her Christian Advent devotion, donned a traditional headscarf to show solidarity with Muslims has been placed on administrative leave.

Larycia Hawkins, a political science professor at the private evangelical Christian college in Chicago's west suburbs, announced last week that she would wear the veil to show support for Muslims who have been under greater scrutiny since mass shootings in Paris and San Bernardino, Calif.

"I stand in religious solidarity with Muslims because they, like me, a Christian, are people of the book," she posted on Facebook.

But it was that explanation of her gesture that concerned some evangelical Christians, who read her statement as a conflation of Christian and Muslim theology.

"While Islam and Christianity are both monotheistic, we believe there are fundamental differences between the two faiths, including what they teach about God's revelation to humanity, the nature of God, the path to salvation and the life of prayer," Wheaton College said in a statement.



Larycia Hawkins, an associate professor of political science at Wheation College who is Christian, wears the hijab throughout Advent as an act of "solidarity with my Muslim sisters." (Stacey Wescott / Chicago Tribune)

Hawkins, 43, planned to wear the hijab everywhere she went until Christmas, including on her flight home to Oklahoma, where voters in 2010 overwhelmingly approved a constitutional amendment banning Shariah, or Islamic law.

She said in a Tribune interview that it's "a time of real vitriolic rhetoric by fellow Christians sometimes and people who aren't Christian who conflate all Muslims with terrorist — and that saddens me — so this is a way of saying if all women wear the hijab we cannot discriminate. If all women were in solidarity, who is the real Muslim? How is TSA going to decide who they really suspect?"

While Hawkins did not need to seek approval from Wheaton, she did seek advice from the Council on American Islamic Relations, to make sure she did not offend Muslims.

Renner Larson, communications director for CAIR's Chicago chapter, said he was intrigued by her decision.

"There's a lot of misconception about why women wear hijab and this idea that women are forced to wear it," said Larson, who is not Muslim. "For a lot of people it's a very powerful choice, especially in the United States it can be a hard, uncomfortable choice. So often women wearing hijab are the targets of attack and hatred because more than anyone else they are so immediately recognizable as Muslim."

Wheaton administrators did not denounce Hawkins' gesture but said more conversation should have taken place before it was announced.

"Wheaton College faculty and staff make a commitment to accept and model our institution's faith foundations with integrity, compassion and theological clarity," the college said in a statement. "As they participate in various causes, it is essential that faculty and staff engage in and speak about public issues in ways that faithfully represent the college's evangelical Statement of Faith."

Last week, a coalition of student leaders at Wheaton drafted an open letter calling on evangelical Christian leaders to condemn recent remarks by Liberty University President Jerry Falwell Jr. that students armed with guns can "end those Muslims."

Gene Green, a professor of the New Testament at Wheaton, said what motivated Hawkins is the same concern many faculty members at the school share about the unfair scrutiny facing the Muslim community.

"Dr. Hawkins and others want to follow the example of Jesus, who went to those who were discriminated against," he said. "He ate with people whom others rejected. Jesus calls us to love our neighbors, and the Muslims are our neighbors."

Larson, who attends a Unitarian Universalist church, said he was dismayed to hear that some view Hawkins' gesture as compromising Christianity.

"It's disappointing that showing solidarity means that you are somehow sacrificing your own identity," he said. "I do what I do not to be closer to Islam but because it makes me closer to my identity as an American who believes in American ideals."

At St. Martin Episcopal Church in Chicago on Sunday, Hawkins was embraced for her act of solidarity. During the service, other parishioners shared their own stories of how they were reaching out to their Muslim neighbors. Hawkins said she expected the embrace from the welcoming Austin neighborhood church. She didn't expect the backlash from her own evangelical brothers and sisters.

"I do care about my Christian brothers and sisters, and I didn't set out to offend them," she said. "My position has been held for centuries."

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/...professor-larycia-hawkins-20151216-story.html
 
I get and support the notion that a Christian might want to show solidarity with muslim people. What I don't get is how this has anything to do with the Christian lady's advent devotion. Seeing as advent is the time when one is to prepare themselves for the coming of the Christ child, it seems especially nonsensical to think that solidarity with a religion that doesn't believe Jesus was Christ would be in keeping with that devotional. I suspect the advent part was a way the lady tried to shield her political actions as religious in nature. I hope we get updates on this case.

""Wheaton College faculty and staff make a commitment to accept and model our institution's faith foundations with integrity, compassion and theological clarity," the college said in a statement. "As they participate in various causes, it is essential that faculty and staff engage in and speak about public issues in ways that faithfully represent the college's evangelical Statement of Faith."

Are these images controversial now?
afde02632c62b7556b46a276e9dcedd9.jpg

en13apr40-43-Bible-video-images-1.jpg
 
Wheaton College, a prominent evangelical school in Illinois, has placed a professor on administrative leave after she posted on Facebook that Muslims and Christians “worship the same God.”

The official school statement Tuesday about associate professor of political science Dr. Larycia Hawkins’s suspension said Wheaton professors should “engage in and speak about public issues in ways that faithfully represent the College’s evangelical Statement of Faith.”

In her Facebook post, Hawkins also said she had chosen to wear a hijab during the Christian season of Advent to show “human solidarity” with Muslims. Hundreds of people liked the post.

“I stand in human solidarity with my Muslim neighbor because we are formed of the same primordial clay, descendants of the same cradle of humankind,” she wrote. “I stand in religious solidarity with Muslims because they, like me, a Christian, are people of the book … But as I tell my students, theoretical solidarity is not solidarity at all. Thus, beginning tonight, my solidarity has become embodied solidarity.”

She linked to a Christianity Today interview with Yale theologian Miroslav Volf on the topic. In the piece, Volf said that “all Christians don’t worship the same God, and all Muslims don’t worship the same God. But I think that Muslims and Christians who embrace the normative traditions of their faith refer to the same object, to the same Being, when they pray, when they worship, when they talk about God. The referent is the same. The description of God is partly different.”

More than 40 students met near Wheaton’s campus Tuesday night to draft an open letter to President Philip Ryken, asking for Hawkins’s reinstatement.

The letter quotes a coalition of concerned students and alumni. “We believe that there is nothing in Larycia Hawkins’ public statements that goes against the belief in the power of God, Christ, or the Holy Spirit that the Statement of Faith deems as a necessary component to Wheaton’s affiliation,” it reads. It asks that she be reinstated.

Hawkins, according to students at the meeting, is the only tenured black female professor at Wheaton.

The students planned a mid-day sit-in Wednesday at Ryken’s office, where they will deliver the letter.

Talk at the Tuesday night meeting was focused on students’ concerns about free speech.

Sophomore Connor Jenkins said the professor “opened up a conversation and was shut down.”

Others expressed concern about what the suspension implied for future faculty expressions of opinion on social media.

A Wheaton staff person who spoke on condition they not be named said the suspension “sets a precedent for what professors can post on their Facebook page. If Dr. Hawkins is being used as a scapegoat, that will send a message to those of use who are employed fulltime.”

The suspension took place less than a week after Wheaton College student leaders published an open letter in their student newspaper denouncing recent controversial comments by Liberty University President Jerry Falwell. Speaking to thousands of students about terrorism, Falwell urged them to arm themselves, saying it would “end … those Muslims.” He later said he meant only violent radicals.

The Wheaton administration later issued a statement praising that open letter, saying school leaders agree with students’ effort to “address our nation’s challenges through respecting the dignity of all people, rejecting religious discrimination, and pursuing the peace that triumphs over hostility.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...suspends-professor-who-said-yes/?tid=pm_pop_b
 
A tenured Wheaton College professor who, as part of her Christian Advent devotion, donned a traditional headscarf to show solidarity with Muslims has been placed on administrative leave.

Larycia Hawkins, a political science professor at the private evangelical Christian college in Chicago's west suburbs, announced last week that she would wear the veil to show support for Muslims who have been under greater scrutiny since mass shootings in Paris and San Bernardino, Calif.

"I stand in religious solidarity with Muslims because they, like me, a Christian, are people of the book," she posted on Facebook.

But it was that explanation of her gesture that concerned some evangelical Christians, who read her statement as a conflation of Christian and Muslim theology.

"While Islam and Christianity are both monotheistic, we believe there are fundamental differences between the two faiths, including what they teach about God's revelation to humanity, the nature of God, the path to salvation and the life of prayer," Wheaton College said in a statement.

Leaned a new word :conflate.:

Larycia Hawkins, an associate professor of political science at Wheation College who is Christian, wears the hijab throughout Advent as an act of "solidarity with my Muslim sisters." (Stacey Wescott / Chicago Tribune)

Hawkins, 43, planned to wear the hijab everywhere she went until Christmas, including on her flight home to Oklahoma, where voters in 2010 overwhelmingly approved a constitutional amendment banning Shariah, or Islamic law.

She said in a Tribune interview that it's "a time of real vitriolic rhetoric by fellow Christians sometimes and people who aren't Christian who conflate all Muslims with terrorist — and that saddens me — so this is a way of saying if all women wear the hijab we cannot discriminate. If all women were in solidarity, who is the real Muslim? How is TSA going to decide who they really suspect?"

While Hawkins did not need to seek approval from Wheaton, she did seek advice from the Council on American Islamic Relations, to make sure she did not offend Muslims.

Renner Larson, communications director for CAIR's Chicago chapter, said he was intrigued by her decision.

"There's a lot of misconception about why women wear hijab and this idea that women are forced to wear it," said Larson, who is not Muslim. "For a lot of people it's a very powerful choice, especially in the United States it can be a hard, uncomfortable choice. So often women wearing hijab are the targets of attack and hatred because more than anyone else they are so immediately recognizable as Muslim."

Wheaton administrators did not denounce Hawkins' gesture but said more conversation should have taken place before it was announced.

"Wheaton College faculty and staff make a commitment to accept and model our institution's faith foundations with integrity, compassion and theological clarity," the college said in a statement. "As they participate in various causes, it is essential that faculty and staff engage in and speak about public issues in ways that faithfully represent the college's evangelical Statement of Faith."

Last week, a coalition of student leaders at Wheaton drafted an open letter calling on evangelical Christian leaders to condemn recent remarks by Liberty University President Jerry Falwell Jr. that students armed with guns can "end those Muslims."

Gene Green, a professor of the New Testament at Wheaton, said what motivated Hawkins is the same concern many faculty members at the school share about the unfair scrutiny facing the Muslim community.

"Dr. Hawkins and others want to follow the example of Jesus, who went to those who were discriminated against," he said. "He ate with people whom others rejected. Jesus calls us to love our neighbors, and the Muslims are our neighbors."

Larson, who attends a Unitarian Universalist church, said he was dismayed to hear that some view Hawkins' gesture as compromising Christianity.

"It's disappointing that showing solidarity means that you are somehow sacrificing your own identity," he said. "I do what I do not to be closer to Islam but because it makes me closer to my identity as an American who believes in American ideals."

At St. Martin Episcopal Church in Chicago on Sunday, Hawkins was embraced for her act of solidarity. During the service, other parishioners shared their own stories of how they were reaching out to their Muslim neighbors. Hawkins said she expected the embrace from the welcoming Austin neighborhood church. She didn't expect the backlash from her own evangelical brothers and sisters.

"I do care about my Christian brothers and sisters, and I didn't set out to offend them," she said. "My position has been held for centuries."

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/...professor-larycia-hawkins-20151216-story.html
 
  • Like
Reactions: mstp1992
I get and support the notion that a Christian might want to show solidarity with muslim people. What I don't get is how this has anything to do with the Christian lady's advent devotion. Seeing as advent is the time when one is to prepare themselves for the coming of the Christ child, it seems especially nonsensical to think that solidarity with a religion that doesn't believe Jesus was Christ would be in keeping with that devotional. I suspect the advent part was a way the lady tried to shield her political actions as religious in nature. I hope we get updates on this case.



Are these images controversial now?
afde02632c62b7556b46a276e9dcedd9.jpg

en13apr40-43-Bible-video-images-1.jpg


As going by a previous thread, Jesus' hair didn't blow in the wind.
 
I get and support the notion that a Christian might want to show solidarity with muslim people. What I don't get is how this has anything to do with the Christian lady's advent devotion. Seeing as advent is the time when one is to prepare themselves for the coming of the Christ child, it seems especially nonsensical to think that solidarity with a religion that doesn't believe Jesus was Christ would be in keeping with that devotional. I suspect the advent part was a way the lady tried to shield her political actions as religious in nature. I hope we get updates on this case.



Are these images controversial now?
afde02632c62b7556b46a276e9dcedd9.jpg

en13apr40-43-Bible-video-images-1.jpg

What you are saying makes sense to me.

For me I think it would basically hinge on if the prof. was trying to make a statement that she believes Islam and Christianity are compatible and/or worshiping the same deity.

I'm all for showing solidarity with Muslims who are being stereotyped and treated unfairly in the West, especially the United States. I'm not for anything which states that the two religions are compatible or the same.
 
I get and support the notion that a Christian might want to show solidarity with muslim people. What I don't get is how this has anything to do with the Christian lady's advent devotion. Seeing as advent is the time when one is to prepare themselves for the coming of the Christ child, it seems especially nonsensical to think that solidarity with a religion that doesn't believe Jesus was Christ would be in keeping with that devotional. I suspect the advent part was a way the lady tried to shield her political actions as religious in nature. I hope we get updates on this case.



Are these images controversial now?
afde02632c62b7556b46a276e9dcedd9.jpg

en13apr40-43-Bible-video-images-1.jpg
So now a Caucasian Christ is OK? Normally that's the first thing libs rail against.
 
What you are saying makes sense to me.

For me I think it would basically hinge on if the prof. was trying to make a statement that she believes Islam and Christianity are compatible and/or worshiping the same deity.

I'm all for showing solidarity with Muslims who are being stereotyped and treated unfairly in the West, especially the United States. I'm not for anything which states that the two religions are compatible or the same.
Islam does worship their understanding of Yahweh. They don't think Yahweh had a son or human persona named Jesus and they don't think Jesus was divine, but they do think he existed as a prophet. Both religions are rooted in Judaism so yes they are different, they have incompatible beliefs, but they aren't foreign to each other and they do pray to the same God.
 
I get and support the notion that a Christian might want to show solidarity with muslim people. What I don't get is how this has anything to do with the Christian lady's advent devotion. Seeing as advent is the time when one is to prepare themselves for the coming of the Christ child, it seems especially nonsensical to think that solidarity with a religion that doesn't believe Jesus was Christ would be in keeping with that devotional. I suspect the advent part was a way the lady tried to shield her political actions as religious in nature. I hope we get updates on this case.



Are these images controversial now?
afde02632c62b7556b46a276e9dcedd9.jpg

en13apr40-43-Bible-video-images-1.jpg
Now you have pissed off a bunch of Muslims. Making the hijab a Christian symbol is probably a fatwa offense.
 
Islam does worship their understanding of Yahweh. They don't think Yahweh had a son or human persona named Jesus and they don't think Jesus was divine, but they do think he existed as a prophet. Both religions are rooted in Judaism so yes they are different, they have incompatible beliefs, but they aren't foreign to each other and they do pray to the same God.

Depends upon how one defines being the same God. See in my faith you can not acknowledge the correct God without acknowledging the Son. So that's a big barrier there. There is a reason that nontrinitarians are considered to be outside of the Christian faith to most Christians.

In fact the Athanasian Creed pretty much states this straight out.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dbq hawk 32
Depends upon how one defines being the same God. See in my faith you can not acknowledge the correct God without acknowledging the Son. So that's a big barrier there. There is a reason that nontrinitarians are considered to be outside of the Christian faith to most Christians.

In fact the Athanasian Creed pretty much states this straight out.
I grant that they aren't Christians, but that wasn't the claim. The claim was they are followers of the same god Yahweh. Do you consider Jews to be worshiping the same Yahweh god as Christians? I think you would be hard pressed to argue they aren't even while you would point out that you think they are doing it wrong. But if you accept them as fellow followers of the God of Abraham, you must accept Muslims too. In fact the Muslim understanding of Yahweh is probably closer to the Jewish understanding than Christianity's.
 
I grant that they aren't Christians, but that wasn't the claim. The claim was they are followers of the same god Yahweh. Do you consider Jews to be worshiping the same Yahweh god as Christians? I think you would be hard pressed to argue they aren't even while you would point out that you think they are doing it wrong. But if you accept them as fellow followers of the God of Abraham, you must accept Muslims too. In fact the Muslim understanding of Yahweh is probably closer to the Jewish understanding than Christianity's.

How necessarily? They may have taken some concepts from Christianity and Judaism but their scripture is entirely different.

If they had taken Judeo/Christian scripture and added to it certain revelations from their prophet, a new way of worship then perhaps.
 
Islam does worship their understanding of Yahweh. They don't think Yahweh had a son or human persona named Jesus and they don't think Jesus was divine, but they do think he existed as a prophet. Both religions are rooted in Judaism so yes they are different, they have incompatible beliefs, but they aren't foreign to each other and they do pray to the same God.

Pray to the same God? Why would anyone believe that?
 
How necessarily? They may have taken some concepts from Christianity and Judaism but their scripture is entirely different.

If they had taken Judeo/Christian scripture and added to it certain revelations from their prophet, a new way of worship then perhaps.
This is what they do. They claim the prior revelations in the Torah and Bible were real, just corrupted by the time they made it into print. A claim that is especially fun if you study how their own texts made it into print, I might add. The Quran and Hadith plagiarizes much of the bible right down to an almost word for word copy of the Lord's prayer. There are whole sections about Jesus and Mary. Islam is most definitely as closely related to Christianity as Christianity is related to Judaism. They are your theological cousins.
 
It appears that religious schools are more guilty than most when it comes to religious tolerance and lack of diversity. So be it. But there is a lesson to be learned here.

It stands to reason that if one of the pillars that your school is built upon is the advancement of a specific religion, it's unlikely you're going to be particularly diverse or tolerant of other religions.
 
This is what they do. They claim the prior revelations in the Torah and Bible were real, just corrupted by the time they made it into print. A claim that is especially fun if you study how their own texts made it into print, I might add. The Quran and Hadith plagiarizes much of the bible right down to an almost word for word copy of the Lord's prayer. There are whole sections about Jesus and Mary. Islam is most definitely as closely related to Christianity as Christianity is related to Judaism. They are your theological cousins.

Being closely related and being theological cousins is not quite the same as worshiping the same God.
 
Being closely related and being theological cousins is not quite the same as worshiping the same God.
I'm curious how you come to this conclusion. The Muslims say they worship Yahweh, the Jews say they worship Yahweh and you say you worship Yahweh. How do you get to exclude or dismiss the Muslims when you accept the Jews? You said the Muslims were out because they don't believe in the triune version of Yahweh. If thats the determination, then the Jews have to worship a different god too. And if you run down that road, then even Jesus (along with every other profit in the bible) worships a different God then the one you pray to. And if you go there, your religion really has no grounding in your own scripture.

Frankly excluding the Muslims creates more problems for your own faith then it does theirs. Trinitarianism is extra biblical. It didn't solidify as a god concept until the late 4th century. Now its probably perfectly defensible to say belief in the trinity concept of Yahweh is necessary to be a Christian. But the moment you say its necessary to believe in the God of Abraham you are on dangerous ground. Because there isn't actually much scriptural support for the trinity. Men made that whole concept up over 300 years after Jesus supposedly died. (Muslims don't think Jesus died, they think it was a trick and Yahweh took him up to Heaven alive.)
 
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman
I'm curious how you come to this conclusion. The Muslims say they worship Yahweh, the Jews say they worship Yahweh and you say you worship Yahweh. How do you get to exclude or dismiss the Muslims when you accept the Jews? You said the Muslims were out because they don't believe in the triune version of Yahweh. If thats the determination, then the Jews have to worship a different god too. And if you run down that road, then even Jesus (along with every other profit in the bible) worships a different God then the one you pray to. And if you go there, your religion really has no grounding in your own scripture.

Frankly excluding the Muslims creates more problems for your own faith then it does theirs. Trinitarianism is extra biblical. It didn't solidify as a god concept until the late 4th century. Now its probably perfectly defensible to say belief in the trinity concept of Yahweh is necessary to be a Christian. But the moment you say its necessary to believe in the God of Abraham you are on dangerous ground. Because there isn't actually much scriptural support for the trinity. Men made that whole concept up over 300 years after Jesus supposedly died. (Muslims don't think Jesus died, they think it was a trick and Yahweh took him up to Heaven alive.)

There is plenty of scriptural support for the trinity but I digress. It was also around from the very beginning but it wasn't formalized until church councils where finally able to settle the matter in the 4th century. In fact the reason they gathered to settle the matter is because while most in the church believed in the trinity a vocal minority opposed it.

The religions having similar foundations and the same name for God does not make it the same God anymore then 2 people having the same name of John Smith makes them the same person. Even if the two where brothers or cousins and had the same name, that doesn't make them the same person.
 
Last edited:
Wheaton college suspends professor wearing hijab to support Muslims — for her explanation, not the act.
If Wheaton College professor Larycia Hawkins had simply donned a headscarf to support her Muslim neighbors without explaining herself, she still might be administering final exams this week.

Instead, Hawkins, a tenured political science professor at the private evangelical Christian college, proclaimed on social media that Christians and Muslims share the same God and was suspended by the college.

"I stand in religious solidarity with Muslims because they, like me, a Christian, are people of the book," she posted Dec. 10 on Facebook. "And as Pope Francis stated last week, we worship the same God."

That explanation rankled some evangelical Christians, who read her statement as a conflation of Christian and Muslim theology, even if they supported her symbolic gesture.

"While Islam and Christianity are both monotheistic, we believe there are fundamental differences between the two faiths, including what they teach about God's revelation to humanity, the nature of God, the path to salvation and the life of prayer," Wheaton College said in a statement.

The suspension, effective immediately and lasting through the spring semester, sparked protests on the west suburban campus Wednesday from students calling for Hawkins' reinstatement and an apology from the college. About two dozen Christian clergy also appeared with Hawkins at a news conference Wednesday in downtown Chicago to show their support.

"I think Wheaton takes very seriously its role as a Christian liberal arts institution," said Hawkins, who wore a purple headscarf, or hijab, as she spoke at the podium. "And I respect the institution."

Hawkins announced last week that she would wear a traditional headscarf as part of her devotion during Advent, the contemplative period preceding Christmas on the Christian calendar. She wished to show support for Muslims who have felt under attack because of harsh rhetoric on social media and the presidential campaign trail since mass shootings in Paris and San Bernardino, Calif. She said nothing about her gesture or statement contradicted the college's statement of faith, which all instructors must sign and she reaffirmed Wednesday.

The statement outlines 12 evangelical beliefs, including the literal truth of the Bible, the necessity to be born again in the Holy Spirit, the imminence of the Second Coming and the bodily resurrection of the dead.

"Wheaton College faculty and staff make a commitment to accept and model our institution's faith foundations with integrity, compassion and theological clarity," the college said in a statement. "As they participate in various causes, it is essential that faculty and staff engage in and speak about public issues in ways that faithfully represent the college's evangelical Statement of Faith."

Protesters on Wednesday insisted that Hawkins had remained faithful to the college's 12 core beliefs. Dozens gathered on the front steps of the college's administration building to deliver a letter to President Philip Ryken and Provost Stan Jones, demanding Hawkins' reinstatement.

"We believe there is nothing in Dr. Hawkins' public statements that goes against the belief in the power and nature of God, Christ, or the Holy Spirit that the Statement of Faith deems as a necessary requirement for affiliation with Wheaton College," the students' letter said.

"Dr. Hawkins is an essential part of the community here," said Wyatt Harms, a senior political science major, who has taken several of Hawkins' classes. "She's a refuge for so many students on campus."

Myra Hooks, 21, a senior biology major from Warsaw, Ind., said the suspension reflects misplaced priorities.

"We really should be focused on our love and support for Muslims, and shouldn't let our theological clarities shut that out," she said.

Chanting "Reinstate Doc Hawk!" dozens of students pumped handmade signs in the air and squeezed through the front doors of the college administration building.

Ryken told protesters he appreciated the "peaceful spirit" of their demonstrations.

"I really want to affirm your right to disagree with a decision by the administration," he told the group. "I also want to affirm the things you see in Dr. Hawkins, the values. Those are things I've seen firsthand as well.

"At some level, I understand the frustration, and also the pain," he added.

Some students supported the college's decision. David Burnham, 21, a junior business and economics major from Naples, Fla., said the administration suspended Hawkins because the statement she made has "profound theological implications."

"By placing her on leave, the school says it doesn't believe Muslims and Christians worship the same God," he said. "The college had no choice."

Abbie Brigham, a 20-year-old junior majoring in history and music, from Jacksonville, Fla., said that for Hawkins to say that Christians and Muslims "unite under the same beliefs" insults both religious groups.

"I think that, as an evangelical school that has a statement of faith, it is wrong for us to call Muslims brothers and sisters in Christ," she said.

Hawkins, 43, of Oak Park, planned to wear the hijab everywhere she went until Christmas, including on her flight home to Oklahoma, where voters in 2010 overwhelmingly approved a constitutional amendment banning Shariah, or Islamic law.

Hawkins said she was inspired by a student who suggested all female college students should wear hijabs on flights home for the holidays.

"In a time of real vitriolic rhetoric, by fellow Christians sometimes, and people who aren't Christian who conflate all Muslims with terrorists — and that saddens me — this is a way of saying if all women wear the hijab we cannot discriminate," Hawkins said in a Tribune interview earlier this week. "If all women were in solidarity, who is the real Muslim? How is TSA going to decide who they really suspect?"

Hawkins sought advice from the Council on American-Islamic Relations to make sure she would not offend Muslims. Renner Larson, communications director for CAIR's Chicago chapter, said he was intrigued by her idea when she approached him.

"There's a lot of misconception about why women wear hijab and this idea that women are forced to wear it," said Larson, who is not Muslim. "For a lot of people it's a very powerful choice. Especially in the United States, it can be a hard, uncomfortable choice. So often women wearing hijab are the targets of attack and hatred because more than anyone else they are so immediately recognizable as Muslim."

But Wheaton administrators insisted it was Hawkins' comments — not her decision to wear a hijab — that was at the root of the problem. She was asked to provide a theological response to several other statements as well, though the college did not provide details.

Denny Burk, a professor of biblical studies at the Southern Baptist Theological Seminary in Louisville, Ky., said his greatest concern about Hawkins' explanation was the lack of clarity about the particulars of Christianity. Without further explaining the nuances of her argument, she implicitly denied Christian teachings, he said.

"We're people of the book, but our books are very different," he said. "They're witnessing to two different ways of salvation. The Bible is witnessing to Jesus Christ, the son of God. That's unique of all the world religions, and that uniqueness was what I thought was missing from what she said."

But Miroslav Volf, a theology professor at Yale Divinity School and founding director of the Yale Center for Faith and Culture, praised Hawkins' gesture as extraordinary and an apt Advent devotion. He said her comments about Christians and Muslims worshipping the same God speak to the common ground the two religions share.

"This is not so much about theology as it is about orthodoxy," said Volf, who recently wrote "Flourishing," a book about the importance of religions taking up common causes. "She has not denied any of the Christian claims that God was the Holy Trinity, that God was incarnate in Jesus Christ and Christ is the savior of the world who died on the cross."

Gene Green, a professor of the New Testament at Wheaton, said what motivated Hawkins is the same concern many faculty members at the school share about the unfair scrutiny facing the Muslim community.

"Dr. Hawkins and others want to follow the example of Jesus, who went to those who were discriminated against," he said. "He ate with people whom others rejected. Jesus calls us to love our neighbors, and the Muslims are our neighbors."

Last week, a coalition of student leaders at Wheaton drafted an open letter calling on evangelical Christian leaders to condemn recent remarks by Liberty University President Jerry Falwell Jr. that students armed with guns can "end those Muslims."

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/...professor-larycia-hawkins-20151216-story.html
 
There is plenty of scriptural support for the trinity but I digress.

The religions having similar foundations and the same name for God does not make it the same God anymore then 2 people having the same name of John Smith makes them the same person. Even if the two where brothers or cousins and had the same name, that doesn't make them the same person.
So you are claiming there are multiple Yahwehs now? All who created Adam, caused the Noah flood, freed the Jews through Moses and sent Jesus? Because that's the Yahweh the Muslims pray to. If you know of another Yahweh that did all this too and you pray to that second New Yahweh, again, you have major problems. Rejecting the Muslims is theologically destructive to your basic cosmology.

It would feel clever to say that you can't be a real Christian if you don't accept the Muslims as fellow believers in the same God. And most might think that's a reference to the Christian self image of inclusion or charitable viewpoints. But in reality Christianity can't even exist if you insist on splitting Yahweh. You destroy your own scripture. Ironically as you weaken your foundations, you actually make Islam stronger as you make them the logical successor to Judaism and paint Christianity as the outsider with zero scriptural ground to stand on. Your faith becomes made up out of whole cloth all in the name of cutting out the Muslims. That's a high price to pay, why would you do it?
 
So you are claiming there are multiple Yahwehs now? All who created Adam, caused the Noah flood, freed the Jews through Moses and sent Jesus? Because that's the Yahweh the Muslims pray to. If you know of another Yahweh that did all this too and you pray to that second New Yahweh, again, you have major problems. Rejecting the Muslims is theologically destructive to your basic cosmology.

It would feel clever to say that you can't be a real Christian if you don't accept the Muslims as fellow believers in the same God. And most might think that's a reference to the Christian self image of inclusion or charitable viewpoints. But in reality Christianity can't even exist if you insist on splitting Yahweh. You destroy your own scripture. Ironically as you weaken your foundations, you actually make Islam stronger as you make them the logical successor to Judaism and paint Christianity as the outsider with zero scriptural ground to stand on. Your faith becomes made up out of whole cloth all in the name of cutting out the Muslims. That's a high price to pay, why would you do it?

There are not multiple Gods, there is the one true God, and the others are false Gods.

To be the same God they have to do not just some of the same things or hit on many of the major points they have to do EXACTLY the same things.

While Islam hits on some of the major points in scripture they can not be the same God unless they do exactly the same things.

Again just because someone has a twin brother with the same name doesn't make them the same person. They can be very similar persons but not the same. I recognize some similarities between the God worshiped by Islam and the God worshiped by Christians and Jews. But whereas Christians and Jews share the same scriptures prior to Christ's conception via the Holy Spirit, Islam uses different scriptures.

You are measuring sameness by pointing out all of the similarities between the two. But similarities between two people don't make them the same person. To be the same they need to be exactly 100% the same with zero differences.

LDS and JW's may worship the same God (though they are not Christians) because they share the same scriptures. But Islam while having similarities to Christianity uses different scriptures.
 
There are not multiple Gods, there is the one true God, and the others are false Gods.

To be the same God they have to do not just some of the same things or hit on many of the major points they have to do EXACTLY the same things.

While Islam hits on some of the major points in scripture they can not be the same God unless they do exactly the same things.

Again just because someone has a twin brother with the same name doesn't make them the same person. They can be very similar persons but not the same. I recognize some similarities between the God worshiped by Islam and the God worshiped by Christians and Jews. But whereas Christians and Jews share the same scriptures prior to Christ's conception via the Holy Spirit, Islam uses different scriptures.

You are measuring sameness by pointing out all of the similarities between the two. But similarities between two people don't make them the same person. To be the same they need to be exactly 100% the same with zero differences.

LDS and JW's may worship the same God (though they are not Christians) because they share the same scriptures. But Islam while having similarities to Christianity uses different scriptures.
Then you have a problem, because the Jewish version of Yahweh is different than the Christian version and Jesus prayed to the Jewish version. So did most every writer of Biblical scripture. You have argued yourself out of a religion my friend.

Better to think of this a bit differently I think. Let me try to save your religion (holy hades!) Your wife and your child and your best friend all know you. They all know you a bit differently. Your best friend might really appreciate your views and opinions on matters you never express to your child. That doesn't mean you are a different person just because one person in your life understands you differently. This is how you should view the state of Yahweh worship in the world. The Jews, Christians and Muslims all are trying to understand and worship the same God; Yahweh. They all understand him differently, but he is the same focal point. Sort of fun to think about, but really most of the world is praying to the God of Israel. The Jews won!
 
Then you have a problem, because the Jewish version of Yahweh is different than the Christian version and Jesus prayed to the Jewish version. So did most every writer of Biblical scripture. You have argued yourself out of a religion my friend.

Better to think of this a bit differently I think. Let me try to save your religion (holy hades!) Your wife and your child and your best friend all know you. They all know you a bit differently. Your best friend might really appreciate your views and opinions on matters you never express to your child. That doesn't mean you are a different person just because one person in your life understands you differently. This is how you should view the state of Yahweh worship in the world. The Jews, Christians and Muslims all are trying to understand and worship the same God; Yahweh. They all understand him differently, but he is the same focal point. Sort of fun to think about, but really most of the world is praying to the God of Israel. The Jews won!

The Jewish scripture is not different from Christian scripture in the Old Testament.
 
The Jewish scripture is not different from Christian scripture in the Old Testament.

But Jewish scripture is different. It doesn't support a trinity. It doesn't support a divine Jesus. Their understanding of Yahweh is fundamentally different. Heck the Jewish scripture supports the view that there are many gods and Yahweh is just the one god out of many who is looking out for the Jews.

Its also not true that Muslims don't use your scripture. Muslims believe the Torah, Psalms and the Gospel message given to Jesus are all true revelations from Yahweh. Together with the Quran and the lost scrolls of Abraham they compose the entirety of Islamic revealed scripture. They just think the stories got embellished and corrupted by the biblical writers or church over time. The Quran is simply the "3rd testament" (to put it in your vernacular) from Yahweh in their view.

In my view its perfectly fine to think Islam is wrong, misguided, corrupted, etc. It's not fair to say they aren't trying to understand the same deity you are trying to understand.
 
But Jewish scripture is different. It doesn't support a trinity. It doesn't support a divine Jesus. Their understanding of Yahweh is fundamentally different. Heck the Jewish scripture supports the view that there are many gods and Yahweh is just the one god out of many who is looking out for the Jews.

Its also not true that Muslims don't use your scripture. Muslims believe the Torah, Psalms and the Gospel message given to Jesus are all true revelations from Yahweh. Together with the Quran and the lost scrolls of Abraham they compose the entirety of Islamic revealed scripture. They just think the stories got embellished and corrupted by the biblical writers or church over time. The Quran is simply the "3rd testament" (to put it in your vernacular) from Yahweh in their view.

In my view its perfectly fine to think Islam is wrong, misguided, corrupted, etc. It's not fair to say they aren't trying to understand the same deity you are trying to understand.

Maybe you are right but can I see a source on Muslim belief in the Torah, Psalms, and Gospels as inspired scripture? Because I've never heard of that.
 
But Jewish scripture is different. It doesn't support a trinity. It doesn't support a divine Jesus. Their understanding of Yahweh is fundamentally different. Heck the Jewish scripture supports the view that there are many gods and Yahweh is just the one god out of many who is looking out for the Jews.

Its also not true that Muslims don't use your scripture. Muslims believe the Torah, Psalms and the Gospel message given to Jesus are all true revelations from Yahweh. Together with the Quran and the lost scrolls of Abraham they compose the entirety of Islamic revealed scripture. They just think the stories got embellished and corrupted by the biblical writers or church over time. The Quran is simply the "3rd testament" (to put it in your vernacular) from Yahweh in their view.

In my view its perfectly fine to think Islam is wrong, misguided, corrupted, etc. It's not fair to say they aren't trying to understand the same deity you are trying to understand.

Just looked this up and it says that Muslims study these things but don't consider them to be divinely revealed scripture. I think that's a major difficulty there. Because they would point at some things and say that God didn't say those or do those things, while we would say that he did. Leading to the conclusion that he is not the same God exactly.

As far as I would say being entirely biased but also honest I would say that Muslims invented a false God which is very very heavily based on the true God. If they considered our scripture divinely inspired I might go for the same God thing in the sense that I do with JW's and LDS. But since they don't I'm not sure I can.
 
Look, according to the story, Muhammad was visited by the Archangel Gabriel (the same Gabriel mentioned in the Jesus story) as well as three other Archangels. Mohommed was told that man has corrupted the word of God as delivered by previous great prophets (Moses; Jesus) and they were visiting Muhammad to set the record straight and reveal the latest and greatest word of God, never to be corrupted by man again.
 
  • Like
Reactions: naturalmwa
Just looked this up and it says that Muslims study these things but don't consider them to be divinely revealed scripture. I think that's a major difficulty there. Because they would point at some things and say that God didn't say those or do those things, while we would say that he did. Leading to the conclusion that he is not the same God exactly.

As far as I would say being entirely biased but also honest I would say that Muslims invented a false God which is very very heavily based on the true God. If they considered our scripture divinely inspired I might go for the same God thing in the sense that I do with JW's and LDS. But since they don't I'm not sure I can.
I'd like to see your source on that because it doesn't jive with nearly everything else I have read on the topic. The Quran specifically states those older scriptures were revelations from Yahweh.

Islamic holy books are the texts which Muslims believe were authored by God to various prophets throughout humanity's history. All these books, in Muslim belief, promulgated the code and laws that God ordained for those people.

Muslims believe the Quran to be the final revelation of God's word to man, and a completion and confirmation of previous scriptures.[1] Despite the primacy that Muslims place upon the Qur'an as God's final word, Islam speaks of respecting all the previous scriptures, and belief in all the revealed books is an article of faith in Islam.

Among the books considered to be revealed, the four mentioned by name in the Qur'an are the Torah (revealed toMoses), the Psalms (Zabur) (revealed to David), the Injil (Gospel) (revealed to Jesus), and the Qur'an itself.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamic_holy_books

Now as an atheist I'm pretty sympathetic to the notion that they invented a god, (hello!) but I'm not sure how you can think that lets you off the hook. If they invented a slightly different version of Yahweh, then so did Christianity. In fact that charge fits Christians far better for their version of Yahweh is much less like the original than the Muslim version. The Muslim Yahweh is directly parallel to the Jewish OT version.

Strategically, this line of thinking has so many problems for Christians I'm shocked so many want to run down this path. If your position is the only real Yahweh is the one who behaves 100% as you would expect Yahweh to behave, you become vulnerable. First because it means Yahweh is static and can't ever evolve or be understood differently by anyone in which case only the most orthodox Jews can even be close to right. Second because it contradicts your own scripture, invalidating your religion. Third because it discredits the extra biblical trinity doctrine which you find so important. Finally, as previously mentioned, because to boosts the Islamic version of Yahweh as far more similar to the original Jewish understanding of that deity.

Christians are not on solid ground here. You sort of need Yahweh to be one single, stable concept to give cover to your own shaky reinterpretation of the god. Start pulling at that house of cards and you may not like the mess you make.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT