Which Amendment needs to go?
- Thread starter William Bonney
- Start date
25th, if it's not being used now, it never will be. Might as well get rid of it if it's useless.
The 17th Amendment has done more to centralize federal government power than any other Amendment. By removing the input of representatives of individual states interests was a huge mistake.
The 16th Amendment turned every American (and future Americans) into a slave. You are in perpetual debt.
Anything that you "own" that requires a deed, or a registration, or something that you pay a "property tax" on is something that you don't really own.
And, a person should own his own wages- what he or she works to acquire using their own body. Your SSN is a pawn ticket.
The Federal Reserve Act removed Congress's (the people) ability to control their own money and currency. The Federal Reserve Banking Cartel (and all of its affiliates) own this country. It's a private syndicate that makes voting virtually useless.
Anything that you "own" that requires a deed, or a registration, or something that you pay a "property tax" on is something that you don't really own.
And, a person should own his own wages- what he or she works to acquire using their own body. Your SSN is a pawn ticket.
The Federal Reserve Act removed Congress's (the people) ability to control their own money and currency. The Federal Reserve Banking Cartel (and all of its affiliates) own this country. It's a private syndicate that makes voting virtually useless.
3rd (pointless these days)
22nd (word it more clearly; I personally think someone should be able to SERVE as President for a maximum of 12 years, and should not be able to SERVE as VP or any other office in line of succession if ineligible to serve as POTUS for the remainder of the current term)
25th, Section 2 (the VP serves very little purpose other than to be next in line. I find it ridiculous that the #2 can be APPOINTED by Washington politicians. It is better to have the office vacant until the next election. The Nixon/Agnew fiasco should have resulted in Carl Albert being POTUS, not Gerald Ford.)
22nd (word it more clearly; I personally think someone should be able to SERVE as President for a maximum of 12 years, and should not be able to SERVE as VP or any other office in line of succession if ineligible to serve as POTUS for the remainder of the current term)
25th, Section 2 (the VP serves very little purpose other than to be next in line. I find it ridiculous that the #2 can be APPOINTED by Washington politicians. It is better to have the office vacant until the next election. The Nixon/Agnew fiasco should have resulted in Carl Albert being POTUS, not Gerald Ford.)
Repeal the 12th amendment. Who ever gets the second most popular votes in the presidential election gets the VP just like it used to be...
Similar threads
