It happens a lot, just doesn’t get the attention. Having said that, not sure he should get anything. I don’t think Jacob Blake should get anything eitherGood. It’s time the white race gets to sue someone.
If you want to know everything that is wrong with that generation:I say I feel bad for the guy, but tough shit, he made a few bad decisions.
Was it from the way he took a header into the concrete?
I don't recall any stories of a tazer paralyzing a person.
That said, unless there is something that the officer did to make his tazer some kind of super paralyzing tazer, the lawsuit should be thrown out. You can not be the reason for an accident and then blame someone else.
No luck, he crimed and ranBroken neck from the fall apparently.
Unless their is some policy violation, it’s bad luck for this guy.
See, I’m good with shooting the legs. Taurus judge with the.410This may be an unpopular opinion, but I don't agree with taser usage for a fleeing/uncooperative suspect who has not been violent and is not threatening violence.
I think it's a good compromise between shooting him, and chasing after him with a very large butterfly net.This may be an unpopular opinion, but I don't agree with taser usage for a fleeing/uncooperative suspect who has not been violent and is not threatening violence.
Name checks out.This may be an unpopular opinion, but I don't agree with taser usage for a fleeing/uncooperative suspect who has not been violent and is not threatening violence.
And then when some dude doesn't stop until he bleeds out we deal with more dumb shit.See, I’m good with shooting the legs. Taurus judge with the.410
I feel nothing. (pun intended)
See my vote in the empathy thread / poll.
DeterrentAnd then when some dude doesn't stop until he bleeds out we deal with more dumb shit.
This may be an unpopular opinion, but I don't agree with taser usage for a fleeing/uncooperative suspect who has not been violent and is not threatening violence.
If I was completely redesigning law enforcement from scratch, maybe I’d factor this in, but as it is, I’m just going to evaluate based on current protocols. If the taser use falls within normal accepted protocols and wasn’t modified or used in a particularly dangerous way, then it doesn’t become problematic just because the guy fell in an unlucky way and ended up with an unexpected physical injury.This may be an unpopular opinion, but I don't agree with taser usage for a fleeing/uncooperative suspect who has not been violent and is not threatening violence.
I feel like I am probably going to hell for laughing at this.
If I was completely redesigning law enforcement from scratch, maybe I’d factor this in, but as it is, I’m just going to evaluate based on current protocols. If the taser use falls within normal accepted protocols and wasn’t modified or used in a particularly dangerous way, then it doesn’t become problematic just because the guy fell in an unlucky way and ended up with an unexpected physical injury.
Would be different if the guy was up on a ledge or climbing a tree or in a place where a taser would likely cause an obvious fall or something.
It's like these people cannot fathom that it could have been their shit.I'm not saying he should win his lawsuit. The police officers were presumably following their standard procedure.
I'm saying that if people take a deep breath and try to be objective, isn't it is a little concerning that Americans have grown accustomed to cops walking around like Sith Lords using force lightning on nonviolent people for "disobeying" their orders.