ADVERTISEMENT

White House Successfully Topples Anti-War Resolution Restricting US Role In Yemen

seminole97

HR Legend
Jun 14, 2005
22,689
23,011
113
US senator Bernie Sanders on Tuesday agreed to withdraw the so-called ‘Yemen War Powers’ resolution from a planned vote on the senate floor, following intense lobbying against the bill by White House officials. “I’m not going to ask for a vote tonight … I look forward to working with the administration who is opposed to this resolution and see if we can come up with something that is strong and effective. If we do not, I will be back,” Sanders said on Tuesday night, alleging that he would enter negotiations with the White House on “compromise language.”

Sanders’ withdrawal of the crucial bill – which would have restricted US military involvement in Yemen and reasserted Congress’ war-making authority – and promise to “be back” comes mere weeks before democrats lose control of the House of Representatives.
 
Should be a lesson for Congress, but it won't be. Once power is ceded to the executive branch, it's nearly impossible to get it back.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NoleinATL
It's a resolution, not a bill. Nothing ceded, nothing gained
Congress ceded war power to the executive branch via the War Powers Act in 1973. Congress now looks the other way when a POTUS uses military force anywhere in the world outside the US.
 
Congress ceded war power to the executive branch via the War Powers Act in 1973. Congress now looks the other way when a POTUS uses military force anywhere in the world outside the US.
I’m as uncomfortable with the use of military power overseas as well, but the hands of Congress aren’t clean. They still have the power of the purse. They could very easily write finding rules into defense authorization bills.
 
I’m as uncomfortable with the use of military power overseas as well, but the hands of Congress aren’t clean. They still have the power of the purse. They could very easily write finding rules into defense authorization bills.
Depending on the parties in charge, that may or may not be effective, but yes, you are right. There's always the threat of veto, and timing can be an issue when Congress waits until the last minute and wants to go home for the holidays. Lots of moving pieces, but somehow the POTUS always has what seems to be a slush fund (see Ukraine).
 
Depending on the parties in charge, that may or may not be effective, but yes, you are right. There's always the threat of veto, and timing can be an issue when Congress waits until the last minute and wants to go home for the holidays. Lots of moving pieces, but somehow the POTUS always has what seems to be a slush fund (see Ukraine).
I’m not any kind of lawyer but it seems to me that Congress could put an amendment into the authorization bill that they are not allowing for any deployment funding without their approval. Every dime spent by the president has to be authorized.
 
It's a resolution, not a bill. Nothing ceded, nothing gained
In this instance, that's not a material distinction.


S. J. RES. 56

Directing the removal of United States Armed Forces from hostilities in the Republic of Yemen that have not been authorized by Congress.


IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
July 14, 2022
Mr. Sanders (for himself, Mr. Leahy, and Ms. Warren) introduced the following joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

JOINT RESOLUTION
Directing the removal of United States Armed Forces from hostilities in the Republic of Yemen that have not been authorized by Congress.

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FINDINGS.

Congress finds the following:
(1) Congress has the sole power to declare war under article I, section 8, clause 11 of the United States Constitution.
(2) Congress has not declared war with respect to, or provided a specific statutory authorization for, the conflict between military forces led by Saudi Arabia, including forces from the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, Kuwait, Egypt, Jordan, Morocco, Senegal, and Sudan (in this section referred to as the “Saudi-led coalition”), against the Houthis, also known as Ansar Allah, in the Republic of Yemen.
(3) Since March 2015, United States Armed Forces have been introduced into hostilities between the Saudi-led coalition and the Houthis in Yemen.
(4) The conflict between the Saudi-led coalition and the Houthis constitutes, within the meaning of section 4(a)(1) of the War Powers Resolution (50 U.S.C. 1543(a)(1)), either hostilities or a situation where imminent involvement in hostilities is clearly indicated by the circumstances into which United States Armed Forces have been introduced.
(5) Pursuant to section 5(b) of the War Powers Resolution (50 U.S.C. 1544(b)), the President shall terminate any use of United States Armed Forces unless the Congress has declared war or has enacted a specific authorization for such use of United States Armed Forces.
(6) Section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution (50 U.S.C. 1544(c)) states that “at any time that United States Armed Forces are engaged in hostilities outside the territory of the United States, its possessions and territories without a declaration of war or specific statutory authorization, such forces shall be removed by the President if the Congress so directs”.
(7) Section 8(c) of the War Powers Resolution (50 U.S.C. 1547(c)) defines the introduction of United States Armed Forces to include “the assignment of members of such armed forces to command, coordinate, participate in the movement of, or accompany the regular or irregular military forces of any foreign country or government when such military forces are engaged, or there exists an imminent threat that such forces will become engaged, in hostilities”, and activities that the United States is conducting in support of the Saudi-led coalition fall within this definition.
(8) Section 1013 of the Department of State Authorization Act, Fiscal Years 1984 and 1985 (50 U.S.C. 1546a) provides that any joint resolution or bill to require the removal of United States Armed Forces engaged in hostilities without a declaration of war or specific statutory authorization shall be considered in accordance with the expedited procedures of section 601(b) of the International Security and Arms Export Control Act of 1976 (Public Law 94–329; 90 Stat. 765).
(9) No declaration of war, specific statutory authorization, or national emergency created by attack upon the United States, its territories or possessions, or its Armed Forces exists for the use of United States Armed Forces with respect to the conflict between the Saudi-led coalition and the Houthis in Yemen pursuant to section 2(c) of the War Powers Resolution (50 U.S.C. 1541(c)), and no provision of law explicitly authorizes the assignment of United States Armed Forces to command, coordinate, participate in the movement of, or accompany the regular or irregular military forces of the Saudi-led coalition in hostilities against the Houthis in Yemen.
SEC. 2. REMOVAL OF UNITED STATES ARMED FORCES FROM HOSTILITIES IN THE REPUBLIC OF YEMEN THAT HAVE NOT BEEN AUTHORIZED BY CONGRESS.
Pursuant to section 1013 of the Department of State Authorization Act, Fiscal Years 1984 and 1985 (50 U.S.C. 1546a) and in accordance with the provisions of section 601(b) of the International Security Assistance and Arms Export Control Act of 1976 (Public Law 94–329; 90 Stat. 765), Congress hereby directs the President to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities against the Houthis in the Republic of Yemen by not later than the date that is 30 days after the date of the adoption of this joint resolution (unless the President requests and the Congress authorizes by joint resolution a later date), and unless and until a declaration of war or specific authorization for such use of United States Armed Forces has been enacted.
SEC. 3. HOSTILITIES DEFINED.

In this joint resolution, the term “hostilities” includes the following:
(1) With respect to United States participation in the military operations of the Saudi-led coalition against the Houthis in Yemen—
(A) sharing intelligence for the purpose of enabling offensive coalition strikes; and
(B) providing logistical support for offensive coalition strikes, including by providing maintenance or transferring spare parts to coalition members flying warplanes engaged in anti-Houthi bombings in Yemen.
(2) The assignment of United States Armed Forces, including any civilian or military personnel of the Department of Defense, to command, coordinate, participate in the movement of, or accompany the regular or irregular military forces of the Saudi-led coalition forces in hostilities against the Houthis in Yemen or in situations in which there exists an imminent threat that such coalition forces become engaged in such hostilities, unless and until the President has obtained specific statutory authorization, in accordance with section 8(a) of the War Powers Resolution (50 U.S.C. 1547(a)).
SEC. 4. RULE OF CONSTRUCTION REGARDING OPERATIONS DIRECTED AT AL QAEDA.
Nothing in this joint resolution may be construed to prohibit United States Armed Forces from engaging in operations directed at al Qaeda or forces associated with al Qaeda.
SEC. 5. RULES OF CONSTRUCTION REGARDING AUTHORIZATIONS FOR USE OF MILITARY FORCE.


(a) In General.—Consistent with section 8(a)(1) of the War Powers Resolution (50 U.S.C. 1547(a)(1)), nothing in this joint resolution may be construed as authorizing the use of military force.
(b) No Modification To Authorization For Use Of Military Force.—Nothing in this joint resolution may be construed to limit, expand, or otherwise modify the scope of the Authorization for Use of Military Force (Public Law 107–40; 50 U.S.C. 1541 note).
 
  • Like
Reactions: Finance85
ADVERTISEMENT