Why can't we make vote count machines that work like this?

[FAUlty Gator]

Seems like the most logical way to count them quickly and efficiently. You hand count the first run 1000 or so and then run them through to make sure they match up accurately. Then ZIP! Done by breakfast.

These things are never wrong and they can read multiple types of bills. Shouldn't be hard to come up with something like this. No?

 

[Rifler]

They already exist,.. End of thread.

 

[FAUlty Gator]

They already exist,.. End of thread.

Not if one county in East Bumfvck is taking 10 days to count votes.

 

[Rifler]

Not if one county in East Bumfvck is taking 10 days to count votes.

Some states require a hand recount,.. That's their choice.

 

[FAUlty Gator]

Some states require a hand recount,.. That's their choice.

Yeah. It's stupid. Count the first 500 by hand. Run them through the machine. Make sure it's on the up and up and be done with it.

 

[Bulldogs1974]

because some wingnut would then say: they coded the machine to work properly for the first 1000 ballots and then counted every 3rd R vote for a democrat.
There's no winning with conspiracies.

 

[THE_DEVIL]

because some wingnut would then say: they coded the machine to work properly for the first 1000 ballots and then counted every 3rd R vote for a democrat.
There's no winning with conspiracies.

or....
THEY DOUBLE COUNTED VOTES!!!!!!