Why doesn't Trump pay his bills? He's now adding Sioux City to the list of cities he has stiffed...

[Joes Place]

LOL. I knew she retired her debt. I distinctly remember the angst it was causing her camp as they positioned for the another run.

But that's not the point.

THAT IS THE POINT

 

[NewVicHawkeye]

Sioux City Sue

 

[NorthernHawkeye]

THAT IS THE POINT

Are you OK being paid over 4 years later?

Or in the case of the Obama link, not at all?

 

[Joes Place]

Springfield Asks Obama to Pay Up for Campaign Event​

In Springfield there remains one piece of unfinished business: an unpaid bill for $55,480​

Springfield Asks Obama to Pay Up for Campaign Event

In Springfield there remains one piece of unfinished business: an unpaid bill for $55,480.

www.nbcchicago.com

A 2012 article?

Seems legit.

 

[Joes Place]

Are you OK being paid over 4 years later?

Or in the case of the Obama link, not at all?

Obama "link" is 10 years old, bro.

 

[Finance85]

Trump has never paid his bills. His companies have filed bankruptcies 6 times. Why would he change now?

 

[ICHawk-I]

Back the blue? Sure.

Pay ‘em? Nah.

"Back the Blue" really only applies to police roughing up BLM and AntiFa.

Don't confuse it with "Bash the Blue" which applies to those who are holding fire extinguishers when the police get in the way of your insurrection.

 

[BGHAWK]

Are you OK being paid over 4 years later?

Or in the case of the Obama link, not at all?

Are you ok with never getting paid? Ever? That's a long time to go and getting screwed the whole time.

 

[NorthernHawkeye]

A 2012 article?

Seems legit.

And?

 

[Joes Place]

And?

That's not "4 years later", as you've insinuated in other posts.

 

[NorthernHawkeye]

That's not "4 years later", as you've insinuated in other posts.

What? You're a complete wreck in this thread.

 

[Joes Place]

What?

Yep.

You posted at 2012 link about "Obama not paying". Cannot help you if you are unable to comprehend dates and timelines here.

 

[C/Seahawk]

This has happened before, with Dem candidates. But I expect most of you already knew that.

its too bad you can't exist on earth without whataboutism being your only response to any criticism of Trump of the GQP. Its how morons operate I suppose.

 

[ironside1]

Are you OK being paid over 4 years later?

Or in the case of the Obama link, not at all?

Isn’t it better than not being paid at all?

 

[Finance85]

What? You're a complete wreck in this thread.

Par for the course.

 

[CarolinaHawkeye]

Why would he start now? And that being said, why would they extend him credit? His credit rating would probably make @NorthernHawkeye's IQ seem huge.

 

[NorthernHawkeye]

Yep.

You posted at 2012 link about "Obama not paying". Cannot help you if you are unable to comprehend dates and timelines here.

Well it's two different candidates were speaking about. Try to keep up.

 

[Rudolph]

To be fair, who could have predicted that the guy who famously never pays his bills, wouldn’t pay his bill?

Still fondly remember telling @goldmom my own personal experience with this and her responding by defending Trump.

 

[Rifler]

Still fondly remember telling @goldmom my own personal experience with this and her responding by defending Trump.

Fond memories of goldmom,.. Seems right

 

[NorthernHawkeye]

its too bad you can't exist on earth without whataboutism being your only response to any criticism of Trump of the GQP. Its how morons operate I suppose.

Remember this the next time you or one of your buddies brings up Trump.

 

[Joes Place]

Well it's two different candidates were speaking about.

YOU are the one who brought up the "other candidates", Cletus.

 

[NorthernHawkeye]

YOU are the one who brought up the "other candidates", Cletus.

And you're the one that can't keep up with the multiple examples on the left that highlight the hypocrisy in this thread.

 

[praguehawk]

Look at your infamously independent ass white-knighting for Trump with this whataboutism. On the topic of not paying bills. Something Trump would just describe as a smart and tough business move! Awesome. Very scorpion says to the frog and you still have the urge to defend him.

More than 4 years later...

 

[Joes Place]

And you're the one that can't keep up with the multiple examples on the left

MANY of those have been shown to be DELAYED payment.

The Obama link you posted was 2012, for Chrissake! Trump has stiffed municipalities that haven't been paid for >5 years now.

 

[NorthernHawkeye]

MANY of those have been shown to be DELAYED payment.

The Obama link you posted was 2012, for Chrissake! Trump has stiffed municipalities that haven't been paid for >5 years now.

Do you have any evidence that Obama has now paid Springfield? If you have it, please provide it.

As for Hillary, I enjoy watching you draw your line of outrage. Hillary pays after 4 years - that's ok. Trump with a similar time frame - OUTRAGE!

Hypocrite!

 

[Joes Place]

Do you have any evidence that Obama has now paid Springfield?

The "latest" link you've been able to dig up is from 2012, Cletus.

The reason you're asking OTHER PEOPLE to search is that you cannot find anything recent.

 

[NorthernHawkeye]

The "latest" link you've been able to dig up is from 2012, Cletus.

The reason you're asking OTHER PEOPLE to search is that you cannot find anything recent.

If there was an article since 2012, it would say that Springfield received payment.

Face it, you're a hack and this thread is shining example of such.

 

[Joes Place]

If there was an article since 2012, it would say that Springfield received payment.

....and you can't find anything, one way or the other, can you?

FWIW, that dispute was NOT over "payment" it was over "paying overtime", and I suspect that Springfield was informed they would ONLY be paid regular pay and NOT overtime pay. And once that aspect of the contract was pointed out to them, they "folded" on their claim of the disputed payments, because they realized they'd been paid in full, per the agreed upon contracts.

 

[NorthernHawkeye]

....and you can't find anything, one way or the other, can you?

FWIW, that dispute was NOT over "payment" it was over "paying overtime", and I suspect that Springfield was informed they would ONLY be paid regular pay and NOT overtime pay. And once that aspect of the contract was pointed out to them, they "folded" on their claim of the disputed payments, because they realized they'd been paid in full, per the agreed upon contracts.

^^^

As I was saying, you're a next level HACK.

 

[Joes Place]

^^^

You didn't read your own link. They paid Springfield; the dispute was over "overtime". ONLY reason that Springfield would drop the claim (and there's no news since 2012), is that they re-read their contract, and they were paid what the contract stated.

If you can find links which claim otherwise, post them. You have not found any.

Trump's case, is NOT PAYING AT ALL.

Which is very different, Cletus.

 

[NorthernHawkeye]

You didn't read your own link. They paid Springfield; the dispute was over "overtime". ONLY reason that Springfield would drop the claim (and there's no news since 2012), is that they re-read their contract, and they were paid what the contract stated.

If you can find links which claim otherwise, post them. You have not found any.

Trump's case, is NOT PAYING AT ALL.

Which is very different, Cletus.

Spin away...

 

[Joes Place]

Spin away...

That dispute over "overtime" pay is literally stated IN YOUR LINKED ARTICLE, Cletus.

 

[Rudolph]

Remember this the next time you or one of your buddies brings up Trump.

Whatabouting a whatabout. Nice!

 

[NorthernHawkeye]

That dispute over "overtime" pay is literally stated IN YOUR LINKED ARTICLE, Cletus.

The unpaid bill is literally stated in the link.

If you have information that it has since been paid, then provide such.

 

[Joes Place]

The unpaid bill is literally stated in the link.

It indeed is.

As is the claim that the campaign was not paying for "overtime", which is what the claim is regarding.

And after that nugget went public, it seems Springfield re-checked their agreement and "folded".

 

[srams21]

The unpaid bill is literally stated in the link.

If you have information that it has since been paid, then provide such.

Why would he? This is a thread about Trump. NO one else.

 

[NorthernHawkeye]

It indeed is.

As is the claim that the campaign was not paying for "overtime", which is what the claim is regarding.

And after that nugget went public, it seems Springfield re-checked their agreement and "folded".

Why won't the campaign pay all of it's bills?

And please provide a link to Springfield re-checking "their agreement" and folding? And what "agreement" are you even referring to? Please provide a link to that as well.

 

[NorthernHawkeye]

Why would he? This is a thread about Trump. NO one else.

And about leftwing hypocrisy.

 

[Joes Place]

Why won't the campaign pay all of it's bills?

It apparently DID.

Overtime was not covered, per their claim. Springfield appears to have abandoned the claim.

 

[Joes Place]

And please provide a link to Springfield re-checking "their agreement" and folding?

Link

(They apparently "folded" and have never, ever brought it up again)