ADVERTISEMENT

Why hasn't trump condemned the Portland attack?

All white people should be apologizing but trump as the leader of the whites should start. That's the new standard.[/QUOTE

But the Bernie homie had the same ideology as you Kenny G!! Maybe u should apologize for him?? Your ideological homies are the ones creating all the chaos,destruction & DEATH... Obozo sure had no problem apologizing for ALLAHU AKBAR every drop on innocent blood that they spilled... You Kenny G just got O W N E D
 
Probably because white, Trump-voting males are statistically the biggest terrorist threat in America, AINEC. 7x more likely to die in America from a loser Conservative terrorist than a loser jihadist.
Really? So 3,000 deaths in one siting and over 50+ in another is comparable......to what exactly?
 
All white people should be apologizing but trump as the leader of the whites should start. That's the new standard.
So Obama should apologize for all black people after ordering the killing of thousands of Muslims across seas?

If be totally down for that.
 
Really? So 3,000 deaths in one siting and over 50+ in another is comparable......to what exactly?

oklahoma.gif
 
@Noble Hawk I used this list. It is running 7 to 1 with incidents in Kansas, New York, and now Portland...

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_terrorist_incidents_in_2017

For longer data sets, you were twice as likely to die from white Conservative extemists in 2016...

http://www.newsweek.com/2016/02/12/...ger-threat-america-isis-jihadists-422743.html

And twice as likely since 9/11...

http://time.com/3934980/right-wing-extremists-white-terrorism-islamist-jihadi-dangerous/

You're welcome.
 
@Noble Hawk I used this list. It is running 7 to 1 with incidents in Kansas, New York, and now Portland...

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_terrorist_incidents_in_2017

For longer data sets, you were twice as likely to die from white Conservative extemists in 2016...

http://www.newsweek.com/2016/02/12/...ger-threat-america-isis-jihadists-422743.html

And twice as likely since 9/11...

http://time.com/3934980/right-wing-extremists-white-terrorism-islamist-jihadi-dangerous/

You're welcome.

Did you actually read the links you posted? If you did and still believe that they support you intitial statement that "you are 7x more likely to die in in America from a loser conservative than a loser jihadist" then you really just aren't that smart. That you flippantly end your post with "you're welcome" shows an embarrassing lack of self awareness to that fact.[/QUOTE]
 
Did you actually read the links you posted? If you did and still believe that they support you intitial statement that "you are 7x more likely to die in in America from a loser conservative than a loser jihadist" then you really just aren't that smart. That you flippantly end your post with "you're welcome" shows an embarrassing lack of self awareness to that fact.
[/QUOTE]

Yes, I read them and saw the facts. Did you bother. Yes, 7x more likely to die by a white Conservative extremist this year. Twice as likely since 9/11. Does adding that make you feel better, snowflake? FACT: You are far more likely to die at the hands of a white Conservative extremist in America than by a jihadist. Sorry the facts bother you.
 

Yes, I read them and saw the facts. Did you bother. Yes, 7x more likely to die by a white Conservative extremist this year. Twice as likely since 9/11. Does adding that make you feel better, snowflake? FACT: You are far more likely to die at the hands of a white Conservative extremist in America than by a jihadist. Sorry the facts bother you.[/QUOTE]

Just stop. You are embarrassing yourself.
 
Translation: I can't refute the numbers...
36_12_20.gif~c200


Why would I engage someone in discussion who makes a stupid statement and thinks he is providing links to bolster his argument when they actually point out the idiocy of his statement. At least you added "in 2017" to your original statement. The irony is that using a four and a half month sample size as a basis for your statement makes you look, well, stupid. That doesn't even take into account that you obviously have not read the study referenced in the Time article. You just looked at the Time headline and plowed forward in ignorant bliss.

But by all means, keep posting cute little gifs and calling me snowflake. As I said, you are embarrassing yourself.
 
Why would I engage someone in discussion who makes a stupid statement and thinks he is providing links to bolster his argument when they actually point out the idiocy of his statement. At least you added "in 2017" to your original statement. The irony is that using a four and a half month sample size as a basis for your statement makes you look, well, stupid.
I gave you other, longer samples for that very reason. Conveniently left that out. I get it.
 
How about more likely to be killed by a black guy then a white guy. So I guess Obama voters are the real murders

I have no idea what your race is but if you are white you are significantly more likely to be killed by a white person.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT