ADVERTISEMENT

Why have liberals been quite about Syria for 4 years?

MichiganManLifer

All-Conference
Jun 15, 2015
473
127
43
I'm confused on this. All the big heart liberals here have demanded that we have no choice but accept syrian refugees (you are 100% bigot racist if you don't)- how can you turn your back on the suffering?

Yet for 4 years, over 250,000 have been murdered and almost all by terrorists. Over 100-200 are dying daily, yet it's these 10,000 that HAVE to come here. Typical liberal hypocrisy? I'm guessing it's 73% male refugees because Obama sat on his hands while the truly innocent were slaughtered.
 
Its because it wasn't politically acceptable to go to war and prevent this type of mass murder and exodus from happening in the first place AND now it isn't politically acceptable to turn away refuges and, in fact, can be used as a tool to help divide and concur for the next election.

Our leaders do not care about these people, they care about how they can use these people's plights to help them get elected/re-elected. Both sides are in it for themselves vs being in it for humanity.

Oh sure it might be the humane to do now to take them in but it certainly wasn't the humane to allow a tyrant to butcher its own citizens in the first place. Unfortunately, as I have stated before, we are in the shit now...might as well play all of our cards to achieve the best possible outcome.
 
Wow, really quiet from the left. I thought we cared about people? Do yourselves a favor and google Syrian Civil war pictures and pat yourselves on the back. After all it was dear leader that said we don't want to get involved right? Why are we getting involved now?
 
Quite what?

Quite indifferent to the plight of the Syrian people. Their president started this crap, ruined the lives of millions of Syrians, then sit back and let them die at the hand of animals. Now that it's getting to election time, you guys are the people of peace, right? Please. Shameful is the only word I can think of that fits.
 
Your post makes no sense. We've been letting Syrian refugees in for some time, and it hasn't been much of an issue. The current conversation has been started by Republicans, who want to stop allowing them. The bleeding hearts haven't changed their views.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman
Quite indifferent to the plight of the Syrian people. Their president started this crap, ruined the lives of millions of Syrians, then sit back and let them die at the hand of animals. Now that it's getting to election time, you guys are the people of peace, right? Please. Shameful is the only word I can think of that fits.
You sounds like an emotional bleeding heart type to me. If you want to go fight foreign wars, the Kurds are accepting western fighters, go sign up. Why do you need the government to do this for you like some libtard?
 
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman
You sounds like an emotional bleeding heart type to me. If you want to go fight foreign wars, the Kurds are accepting western fighters, go sign up. Why do you need the government to do this for you like some libtard?

I'm not a bleeding heart, but if I cause a war that causes millions to get killed, then I should be held accountable. Obama lied, people died. If your hero didn't want to fight a war, why did he destroy their country? He seems like more of a madman than the hawks that at least try to accomplish something. He's fine destroying countries to make room for his caliphate i guess.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 86Hawkeye
I'm not a bleeding heart, but if I cause a war that causes millions to get killed, then I should be held accountable. Obama lied, people died. If your hero didn't want to fight a war, why did he destroy their country? He seems like more of a madman than the hawks that at least try to accomplish something. He's fine destroying countries to make room for his caliphate i guess.

Seriously...are you high?
 
  • Like
Reactions: naturalmwa
You sounds like an emotional bleeding heart type to me. If you want to go fight foreign wars, the Kurds are accepting western fighters, go sign up. Why do you need the government to do this for you like some libtard?

To be fair this is as hollow to say as "So Natural how many Muslim refugees will you be putting up in your house?".
 
I'm not a bleeding heart, but if I cause a war that causes millions to get killed, then I should be held accountable. Obama lied, people died. If your hero didn't want to fight a war, why did he destroy their country? He seems like more of a madman than the hawks that at least try to accomplish something. He's fine destroying countries to make room for his caliphate i guess.
I have no idea what you are talking about but this sounds like typical hair on fire liberal hysterics.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman
To be fair this is as hollow to say as "So Natural how many Muslim refugees will you be putting up in your house?".
I think that's wrong for a couple reasons. First I want zero refugees brought here, house them close to home so they can get back there after Russia takes the country over.

Second you're missing the dig at ManLifer's political philosophy by pointing out he should just take personal responsibility and take advantage of the opportunities the market allows him to act with regard to this issue. So in that way I full acknowledge the absurdity of what I suggest and that absurdity is the real point.
 
  • Like
Reactions: unIowa
I'm confused on this. All the big heart liberals here have demanded that we have no choice but accept syrian refugees (you are 100% bigot racist if you don't)- how can you turn your back on the suffering?

Yet for 4 years, over 250,000 have been murdered and almost all by terrorists. Over 100-200 are dying daily, yet it's these 10,000 that HAVE to come here. Typical liberal hypocrisy? I'm guessing it's 73% male refugees because Obama sat on his hands while the truly innocent were slaughtered.
Why do you say you work 80 hours a week when you're on here all the time?
 
I have no idea what you are talking about but this sounds like typical hair on fire liberal hysterics.

I'll clarify. Obama and the CIA started this crap in Syria. Then they let Assad struggle fighting his own people letting hundreds of thousands of citizens die without doing a thing. Then when the situation is so horrible that half the country flees, he (and the rest of you minions) take a firm stance that we MUST protect 10,000 refugees or else conservatives are racist. Never mind the 250,000 that he let die without a peep from his followers. Does that make more sense?

- Obama started this
- He let 250 k die
- Now he's helping dems play politics rather than looking out for his own people.


Tell me, how are conservatives racist again.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 86Hawkeye
I think that's wrong for a couple reasons. First I want zero refugees brought here, house them close to home so they can get back there after Russia takes the country over.

Second you're missing the dig at ManLifer's political philosophy by pointing out he should just take personal responsibility and take advantage of the opportunities the market allows him to act with regard to this issue. So in that way I full acknowledge the absurdity of what I suggest and that absurdity is the real point.

Whooaaaa....totally thought you would be on the other side of this. Good to see liberals that can see some of these things with clear eyes and long vision vs a short term emotional pull at ones heartstrings (which everyone's hearts should ache for these refugees).

1. Why cart these folks half way across the globe.
2. Would a M.E. devout practicing Muslim really have an shot of assimilating into American culture and values (I would hope so because we are so wildly awesome BUT I have my doubts).
3. Does anyone really want to be chased away from their homeland? I get wanting to escape violence but most people have a emotional attachment to their home (I think we should train these refugees so they can go fight for theirs with our help).
4. If we disperse these refugees do we forget about the enormity of the problem, out of sight out of mind sort of deal...a UN safe zone means we stay focused on fixing the problem.
5. Potential Terrorism - we can't just ignore the possibilities bc it isn't PC to talk about them.
 
I'll clarify. Obama and the CIA started this crap in Syria. Then they let Assad struggle fighting his own people letting hundreds of thousands of citizens die without doing a thing. Then when the situation is so horrible that half the country flees, he (and the rest of you minions) take a firm stance that we MUST protect 10,000 refugees or else conservatives are racist. Never mind the 250,000 that he let die without a peep from his followers. Does that make more sense?

- Obama started this
- He let 250 k die
- Now he's helping dems play politics rather than looking out for his own people.


Tell me, how are conservatives racist again.

There is something real about the things I have highlighted. It is what makes American politics awful.
 
Why do you say you work 80 hours a week when you're on here all the time?

I don't work 80 hours. You know how many I am working this week? 0. Just so I can keep you company. Guess how many I HAVE to work this week or next week? 0. I WORKED that hard for years to gain financial independence. Your ridiculous envy is sad.

Why do you make racist jokes while pretending to care about refugees again?
 
I don't work 80 hours. You know how many I am working this week? 0. Just so I can keep you company. Guess how many I HAVE to work this week or next week? 0. I WORKED that hard for years to gain financial independence. Your ridiculous envy is sad.

Why do you make racist jokes while pretending to care about refugees again?
Which one is it? Do you work 80 hours a week, or do you work harder than any immigrant? Because you made both these claims. I'm simply pointing out the unlikelihood of either given how often you're on here.
 
I'll clarify. Obama and the CIA started this crap in Syria. Then they let Assad struggle fighting his own people letting hundreds of thousands of citizens die without doing a thing. Then when the situation is so horrible that half the country flees, he (and the rest of you minions) take a firm stance that we MUST protect 10,000 refugees or else conservatives are racist. Never mind the 250,000 that he let die without a peep from his followers. Does that make more sense?

- Obama started this
- He let 250 k die
- Now he's helping dems play politics rather than looking out for his own people.


Tell me, how are conservatives racist again.
I don't think you're representing a conservative position here at all. You sound like a typical liberal who thinks he knows best and wants to run everyone's lives for them. I'm the conservative in this debate. STFO, that's conservative.

While we're at it, could you backup your claim that Obama started this? TiA.
 
Last edited:
Which one is it? Do you work 80 hours a week, or do you work harder than any immigrant? Because you made both these claims. I'm simply pointing out the unlikelihood of either given how often you're on here.

When you have some financial power, you choose what you do, when you do it. I worked hard for years to get myself to this position. Of course, every time I say that I forget I'm talking to a liberal that doesn't believe in working and building a life on their own.

Here's how I picture you each time you read the brilliance of my posts.

19ba1-confused2bboy.jpg
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT