They cant be hacked after all. The inefficiency makes it more secure.
Tech is not always the answer, sometimes its the problem.
Tech is not always the answer, sometimes its the problem.
This is the most hilarious like ratio I've ever seen.Yep, there’s no other possible way to change paper ballots.....Maybe we should make everyone use a #2 pencil while we are at it.
I like that, #2 it is.Yep, there’s no other possible way to change paper ballots.....Maybe we should make everyone use a #2 pencil while we are at it.
We do need an audit trail.
Where I've always voted it has been paper scantron ballots.
I can't really think of anything that offers better trade offs overall.
I have zero faith in a system without physical record.
Or old fashioned voting machines. I tussled with them many times as a voting precinct chairman (I mean after voting was over and they had to be read)..They cant be hacked after all. The inefficiency makes it more secure.
Tech is not always the answer, sometimes its the problem.
They cant be hacked after all. The inefficiency makes it more secure.
Tech is not always the answer, sometimes its the problem.
Yep, there’s no other possible way to change paper ballots.....Maybe we should make everyone use a #2 pencil while we are at it.
Yep, there’s no other possible way to change paper ballots.....Maybe we should make everyone use a #2 pencil while we are at it.
On a mass scale like you can with a hack? Really???
10 counties could decide the election.
https://thehill.com/homenews/state-watch/459832-the-10-counties-that-will-decide-the-2020-election
That's what the 2 hours of silence from the Hillary camp on election night 2016 was for. She was expecting people in Florida and Michigan to be frantically filling out ballots after the polls closed until they put her over the top.They cant be hacked after all. The inefficiency makes it more secure.
Tech is not always the answer, sometimes its the problem.
10 counties could decide the election.
Well your are from Florida, you have a point. Most states (Iowa for example) are not as criminally inspired on election day as Florida.Where I've always voted it has been paper scantron ballots.
I can't really think of anything that offers better trade offs overall.
I have zero faith in a system without physical record.
Most states (Iowa for example) are not as criminally inspired on election day as Illinois.
Nope...,.Illinois has nothing over Florida and North Carolina other than reputation.FIFY
This is the first thing you've ever posted that makes sense.They cant be hacked after all. The inefficiency makes it more secure.
Tech is not always the answer, sometimes its the problem.
I'd rather discuss my hatred of the USA
Was it a machine that tallied it or a person ??Never voted on anything but a paper ballot
As opposed to the 30 days it now takes for states run by Dumocrats. Yeah, I'll take 3 days over 30. Common sense to the rescue.Because we wouldn't know who won for three days.
They cant be hacked after all. The inefficiency makes it more secure.
Tech is not always the answer, sometimes its the problem.
Don't let facts get in the way of a GREAT story.As opposed to the 30 days it now takes for states run by Dumocrats. Yeah, I'll take 3 days over 30. Common sense to the rescue.
How about stone tablets? Those are infallible.They cant be hacked after all. The inefficiency makes it more secure.
Tech is not always the answer, sometimes its the problem.
Agreed. This last election was rigged and stolen.They cant be hacked after all. The inefficiency makes it more secure.
Tech is not always the answer, sometimes its the problem.