...she made on Sunday? If these terrorist are Syrians, it can't be very good for her with that comment. Will she double down? Should she?
Will HILLARY walk back her "we need to take in 65,000 Syrians" comment...
- Thread starter YellowSnow51
- Start date
Will Liberal CBS have the guts to ask that question during the Debate tomorrow!
Terrorism will not be a "hard" topic.
The MSM will throw softballs and make Hill and Bernie engage in full-frontal copulation before rendering a "self-identifying" position for Bernie.
Then Bernie will speak.
Game/Set/Match Freedom.
Last edited:
These people like hill seperate isil from isis from dash from al q from syrians from immigrants from iranians from blah blah
The missed point in all of this, is that we just had another reason 'reaffirmed' as to why we need to continue to be involved over there.
The great thing about Hillary is that she will commit a lot of time getting all the angles on this issue and will come back with the correct answer that is totally not based on the winds of politics.
I like how you guys care so much about the 2nd which is in good health when the 4th is gutted and dead on the floor.
And dont get me started on their pussy stance on the 3rd.
If you like the last 20 years of foreign politics Hills is your woman. They are all the same.
Hillary is a liar and a scummy politician. No shock she will be the D candidate and our next POTUS.
yes, so that we may "cross the line" and go to war in Syria, yes, it's all planned and planted {passports}, blah blah
Hillary may now be able to "compartmentalize", I.E. :these are the good rebels which we fund, these are the bad guys.... these are the good guys in Benghazi whom we run guns to, these are the bad guys.....
Why should she? Is it sensible to be reactionary and condemn entire groups? Is a child and mother fleeing from their lives in war torn Syria to be held culpable for yesterday? ISIS appears to be responsible, lets concentrate on them is my opinion.
you have posted that before and I honestly do not recall that. I would honestly own it if I recalled it, I honestly do not. I remember vividly- talking about the missing nukes or suitcase nukes with you, from Shreveport and or north Carolina a few years ago....
Trust me, I would certainly own that one if I recalled it. I do not recall. I wish we had archives here where we could search this stuff.
The passports survived the detonation of their suicide vests? Why would they have passports on them? Were they wearing Timex watches?
Seriously, if they did have Syrian passports, than this operation was designed to provoke an EU response [i.e. crackdown] to the mass Syrian immigration. One thing these jidadis are good at is playing the victim.
maybe. was it when we were talking about the missing nukes at Shreveport and NC, and I said they were gonna touch off a dirty bomb or suitcase nuke? I recall saying that, but I thought I said it was gonna be here. maybe I said north America meaning here and canada and mexico. who knows. I just do not recall singling out mexico city.
Let's stop being ridiculous here.
Firstly: The Syrian refugees are NOT ISIS. They are being attacked and displaced by ISIS. Many are caught in between a brutal regime and a brutal Sunni-related insurgency.
Second: France and Paris have had lots of problems with Muslim extremists, and have done themselves no favors by marginalizing the Arabic people who have migrated there. Rather than integrate them into society, they are mostly outcasts, and that kind of disparity breeds unrest and terrorism.
Third: Where are groups like ISIS getting all their funding and weapons? It's not Iran, because the ISIS group arose from the Iraqi Sunni tribes; Iran is probably actively fighting against them (Shia and Sunni are like oil and water). More than likely, this group is funded by Saudis and other Gulf States, who we generally do not like, but we prop them up so we can get cheap oil from them.
And therein lies the problem: you will NEVER defeat groups like ISIS so long as there are factions in the region who have access to funds and continue to support them.
That is one aspect of the Bush presidency I can stand behind: The Bush Doctrine. We will take the fight to those who support and fund these kinds of terrorism and terrorist groups.
If it is indeed the Saudis, the Omanis, the Yemenis etc who are providing weapons and funds to these people, it's time for the rest of the world to stop playing Whack-A-Mole with the groups they fund, and start lopping off the snake heads.....of course, we will have to be ok with paying $200 a barrel for oil during that mess. But I doubt Americans have the stomach for that kind of personal sacrifice. So, instead of funding massive energy plans to eliminate the need for oil, or funding local transit plans and taking trains instead of driving, we'll just continue to recruit 20-year old kids to go over there and sacrifice their potential and their lives, so we can live in our oil-fed bliss and comfort here at home...
Firstly: The Syrian refugees are NOT ISIS. They are being attacked and displaced by ISIS. Many are caught in between a brutal regime and a brutal Sunni-related insurgency.
Second: France and Paris have had lots of problems with Muslim extremists, and have done themselves no favors by marginalizing the Arabic people who have migrated there. Rather than integrate them into society, they are mostly outcasts, and that kind of disparity breeds unrest and terrorism.
Third: Where are groups like ISIS getting all their funding and weapons? It's not Iran, because the ISIS group arose from the Iraqi Sunni tribes; Iran is probably actively fighting against them (Shia and Sunni are like oil and water). More than likely, this group is funded by Saudis and other Gulf States, who we generally do not like, but we prop them up so we can get cheap oil from them.
And therein lies the problem: you will NEVER defeat groups like ISIS so long as there are factions in the region who have access to funds and continue to support them.
That is one aspect of the Bush presidency I can stand behind: The Bush Doctrine. We will take the fight to those who support and fund these kinds of terrorism and terrorist groups.
If it is indeed the Saudis, the Omanis, the Yemenis etc who are providing weapons and funds to these people, it's time for the rest of the world to stop playing Whack-A-Mole with the groups they fund, and start lopping off the snake heads.....of course, we will have to be ok with paying $200 a barrel for oil during that mess. But I doubt Americans have the stomach for that kind of personal sacrifice. So, instead of funding massive energy plans to eliminate the need for oil, or funding local transit plans and taking trains instead of driving, we'll just continue to recruit 20-year old kids to go over there and sacrifice their potential and their lives, so we can live in our oil-fed bliss and comfort here at home...
Yes, if we just embrace common sense climate change solutions, we can defeat Islamic Terrorism.
Hahahaha... the faith is strong with this one.
How do you know there are no ISIS members among the refugees?
France does have a lot of problems with Muslims. Party because they have too many of them. Muslim culture is not a western culture. Predicable results. The answer is not to allow them to change French culture to accommodate their culture. The answer is the other way around.
ISIS needs to be destroyed where they live, in their "country" (caliphate). Absolutely stupid to play defense and wait for them to attack western territory. The western countries have the capability to destroy ISIS, but thus far have lacked the will.
So sorry that the solution to eliminate our involvement in the Middle East just happens to be consistent with tactics to limit climate change. But it's a fact.
Unlike the claim that we can shore up our domestic oil production by importing from Canada....
Will the Liberal CBS moderator have the guts to ask HRC this tonight!
If he doesnt it will be a more proof of the debate bias !!!
If he doesnt it will be a more proof of the debate bias !!!
