Does the candidate you vote against miss more than the candidate you are for hits on the issues?
Don't try to hijack the thread into a different direction and answer the question.
I didn't say you shouldn't be allowed to vote. I just said you shouldn't. Kinda like you don't think I should display this flag, but wouldn't (I hope) take away my right to do so.
Now pretty soon this thread will dissolve into one on abortion when it should be about religion.
Not really the case. I was just being nice and giving you the benefit of the doubt.
If it's Rubio or Kasich or Jeb or Carly, I'll be voting for them. If it's any of the others, I'd be voting against Hillary.
If you can vote for any of those other nutbags, Trump shouldn't be much of a stretch.
Yes. And I'm glad my vote has never contributed to the apparent acceptability of someone who isn't good enough to be in the White House.Your effects that all important who got the most votes argument.
They all suck, the establishment can't provide good can roasted because their past sins have caught up with them. The platform on which they stand is corrupt and everyone knows it. No one believes in the BS anymore.
He was indisputably born in the US. To non-citizen parents. So he's at least an anchor baby, right?
Ditto, though it is still the least of the evils. I don't get caught up on which team they are on like many of you republican/democratic loving losers.
Well that is true. If it is Jeb/Hill I'll be exploring my 3rd party candidates. If it's any other GOP/Hill who that GOP candidate will determine my for/against vote. If it's Trump I'll vote against.
Your reading is one interpretation but it is not the obvious meaning of the constitution.
