Everybody is entitled to their own opinion, but I wouldn't want her coaching my team any more then I would want Urban Meyer coaching the football team. Just IMHO.By nearly every consequential measure, Mulkey is the obvious choice.
When I hear Mulkey speak I think I did something wrongBy nearly every consequential measure, Mulkey is the obvious choice.
She belongs to a school like LSU.By nearly every consequential measure, Mulkey is the obvious choice.
Yeah. The question is, just how bad do you want to win?Mulkey is a shitty person. Do some research and her and her family.
Bluder all the way.
Yeah. The question is, just how bad do you want to win?
Mulkey will win more, but is a bigot.
Don't be a drama queen. Unless you're unemployed and live in the back of a van, you aren't going to tremendously disrupt your life because of who coaches WBB at Iowa. That's silly.Mulkey is more than a bigot, she is a horrible human. If you thought Steve Alford was bad, Mulkey is 10 times worse. I would seriously consider moving out of the state if she came to Iowa City.
Luckily this would never happen.
Exactly right. Which DOES raise EXACTLY that question. To the guys saying Mulkey over Bluder, is MAYBE winning a title, (there is NO saying its a sure thing) worth having some loathsome person who you have zero respect for coaching for us? Really? Also might want to consider that the lady your kicking to the curb, is not only highly respected, AND one of the winningest coaches ever, BUT she just took us the title game. Begs the old question, "At WHAT price fame" don't you think......Don't be a drama queen. Unless you're unemployed and live in the back of a van, you aren't going to tremendously disrupt your life because of who coaches WBB at Iowa. That's silly.
Like her or not, she wins national championships wherever she goes - as a player, as an assistant coach, and as head coach. Alot of fans can't stomach an SOB coach - I understand - it all comes down to whether you place a higher priority on winning a national championship.
What has she done that is so horrible? Be specific and do not dodge.worth having some loathsome person who you have zero respect for coaching for us?
Mulkey is flamboyant, pugnacious, and outspoken. I suspect a lot of Hawk fans also don't like her because her team rolled over Iowa in the championship game. I can see why her personality can rub people the wrong way. I never liked Bob Knght either. But coaches don't get voted into the Hall of Fame based on personality; they are elected based on accomplishments and you have to respect that.What has she done that is so horrible? Be specific and do not dodge.
She is a terrible person. I’ve seen this first hand.By nearly every consequential measure, Mulkey is the obvious choice.
Don't be a drama queen. Unless you're unemployed and live in the back of a van, you aren't going to tremendously disrupt your life because of who coaches WBB at Iowa. That's silly.
Like her or not, she wins national championships wherever she goes - as a player, as an assistant coach, and as head coach. Alot of fans can't stomach an SOB coach - I understand - it all comes down to whether you place a higher priority on winning a national championship.
Why didn't you say so in the first place? She is flamboyant. That only makes her a type of person I don't care about personally. That doesn't make her a horrible person. Fran is a hot head. I don't like hot heads. I do not think that Fran is a horrible person.She is a terrible person. I’ve seen this first hand.
She’s more than flamboyant. She’s obnoxious, mean, disrespectful, and arrogant.Why didn't you say so in the first place? She is flamboyant. That only makes her a type of person I don't care about personally. That doesn't make her a horrible person. Fran is a hot head. I don't like hot heads. I do not think that Fran is a horrible person.![]()
I doubt very seriously that she could be a big successful recruiter and have those attributes. You have to win over kids, not turn them away.She’s more than flamboyant. She’s obnoxious, mean, disrespectful, and arrogant.
Except winning cures alot of evils in some people's minds. That would seem to be obvious. I mean really, were on the Iowa website and our coach JUST had the best year EVER in school history, and played for the national title and some of our own fans ready to kick her to the curb, because the other coach won one more game for the ring. If that doesn't tell you something about win, no matter what with some fans, I don't know what would.I doubt very seriously that she could be a big successful recruiter and have those attributes. You have to win over kids, not turn them away.
I think this question is really better at identifying the idealists and realists, when it comes to the college athletics dynamic. I think you could argue that a majority of Iowa fans want their players to be great ambassadors for the university, go to school, and compete on an even playing field. Same goes for the coaches... The realists say... F-that... Iowa has the resources to win natties, so why shouldnt they have those expectations? Along with the idea that they are athletes, some just happen to be students, too.Exactly right. Which DOES raise EXACTLY that question. To the guys saying Mulkey over Bluder, is MAYBE winning a title, (there is NO saying its a sure thing) worth having some loathsome person who you have zero respect for coaching for us? Really? Also might want to consider that the lady your kicking to the curb, is not only highly respected, AND one of the winningest coaches ever, BUT she just took us the title game. Begs the old question, "At WHAT price fame" don't you think......
My point being that its not like Bluder hasn't been one of the top coaches for some time. The last five years we've been 5-8 years we've been fighting for the top spot in the conference, won it, won several conf tourneys, several sweet 16's a couple of elite 8's and now played for a title, and NOW we'd have a discussion about replacing her with THAT. Sorry, but I don't call that being realistic, or much of a fan either. The job she's done the last decade deserves WAY more then that.I think this question is really better at identifying the idealists and realists, when it comes tothe college athletics dynamic. I think you could argue that a majority of Iowa fans want there players to be great ambassadors for the university, go to school, and compete on an even playing field. Same goes for the coaches... The realists say... F-that... Iowa has the resources to win natties, so why shouldnt they have those expectations? Along with the idea that they are athletes, some just happen to be students, too.
Have you ever met her? Because I haveI doubt very seriously that she could be a big successful recruiter and have those attributes. You have to win over kids, not turn them away.
I know the question was about Bluder... but i was thinking from a more macro level and the overall temperature of the fanbase. IM not sure many would trade Bluder for the Grinch... and those that would are all about chasing trophies, rather than the big picture.My point being that its not like Bluder hasn't been one of the top coaches for some time. The last five years we've been 5-8 years we've been fighting for the top spot in the conference, won it, won several conf tourneys, several sweet 16's a couple of elite 8's and now played for a title, and NOW we'd have a discussion about replacing her with THAT. Sorry, but I don't call that being realistic, or much of a fan either. The job she's done the last decade deserves WAY more then that.
Britney Griner — who won a NC for Mulkey — has said Mulkey told her to hide the fact that she was gay while a student at Baylor. She later threw BG under the bus to the press when asked if she had any remarks when she was incarcerated.What has she done that is so horrible? Be specific and do not dodge.
You really only make one point and I totally disagree with it. A coach should never have the back of one of their athletes involved in criminal behavior.She later threw BG under the bus to the press when asked if she had any remarks when she was incarcerated.
Some people may not be fans of BG bc of whatever predisposition you have to people who’ve smoked weed or are black + gay. But her coach should have her back always — as a player and as an alum.
Lets just agree to disagree then on what we want to see as values from the coach who represents out University. Obviously if they win you don't give a flying f--- what they do or how they act, and thank goodness many here stand opposed. The REALLY crazy thing still is that we are having this conversation at all. We just played for the national title, and we're on here with people saying, hell I don't care what Mulkey does, I'd rather have her". Thats absolutely mind boggling...You really only make one point and I totally disagree with it. A coach should never have the back of one of their athletes involved in criminal behavior.
So far, nothing posted to validate that Mulkey is a horrible person.
Are you insane? In no way should a sane person draw that conclusion. I have asked what she has done wrong and have NOT received a viable answer. What her style is doesn't compel me to crucify her character. The question is hypothetical. I NEVER implied that I wanted Bluder fired. WAKE UP!!!Lets just agree to disagree then on what we want to see as values from the coach who represents out University. Obviously if they win you don't give a flying f--- what they do or how they act, and thank goodness many here stand opposed. The REALLY crazy thing still is that we are having this conversation at all. We just played for the national title, and we're on here with people saying, hell I don't care what Mulkey does, I'd rather have her". Thats absolutely mind boggling...
Several people gave you FIRST hand accounts of her actions on and off the court, and you've glossed right over them like they don't matter. Don't want her. Maybe you do, and so do some others. Enough said......Are you insane? In no way should a sane person draw that conclusion. I have asked what she has done wrong and have NOT received a viable answer. What her style is doesn't compel me to crucify her character. The question is hypothetical. I NEVER implied that I wanted Bluder fired. WAKE UP!!!
None of them were viable.....NONE.Several people gave you FIRST hand accounts of her actions on and off the court, and you've glossed right over them like they don't matter. Don't want her. Maybe you do, and so do some others. Enough said......
Super. Thats your opinion. Others disagree. They think she's a shitty person, and you don't. Great. We disagree....None of them were viable.....NONE.
Humm. Would not want patShe can obviously coach and recruit but I'm not a fan... at all. It's always about her. I don't think I'd support that.
I'd have been much happier with Pat Summit.
Humm. Would not want pat
Way to take the high road. Summit may have not have been as good, but at least she’s not Mulkey.She can obviously coach and recruit but I'm not a fan... at all. It's always about her. I don't think I'd support that.
I'd have been much happier with Pat Summit.