In the linked article a former Mossad head, and no softy on Iran, is strongly critical of Netanyahu - suggesting that Netanyahu's stance is harmful to Israel's security. Anonymous current people in Israel's security apparatus are upset that Netanyahu would get up Obama's nose on this by addressing Congress. And, naturally enough, Netanyahu's political opponents criticize him for trying to use the address to Congress to win the upcoming election.
One of the parts of this interesting article that caught my eye was the suggestion that if Netanyahu pisses off Obama enough, the US might stop protecting Israel at the UN.
For those who don't know, there are periodic resolutions proposed to condemn or sanction Israel for violations of various UN resolutions or charter requirements, for violations of human rights, and for war crimes. Some of them even have substantial merit and only die because of the US veto. But the US ALWAYS does veto such efforts. In addition, the US reliably does Israel's bidding on stalling cease fires and such when Israel has decided to mow the lawn a little, or a lot.
Point being, if the US simply doesn't exercise its veto, Israel would find itself in serious hot water very quickly. Let a couple of those puppies go through and suddenly nations around the world have "legal" permission to get very nasty toward Israel.
Personally, I don't think there's any chance Obama would let Netanyahu piss him off that much. It isn't just about Netanyahu, after all. But why would Netanyahu take that risk? Is he that sure Obama will be reasonable? Or does he think Obama is his poodle?
Guardian
One of the parts of this interesting article that caught my eye was the suggestion that if Netanyahu pisses off Obama enough, the US might stop protecting Israel at the UN.
For those who don't know, there are periodic resolutions proposed to condemn or sanction Israel for violations of various UN resolutions or charter requirements, for violations of human rights, and for war crimes. Some of them even have substantial merit and only die because of the US veto. But the US ALWAYS does veto such efforts. In addition, the US reliably does Israel's bidding on stalling cease fires and such when Israel has decided to mow the lawn a little, or a lot.
Point being, if the US simply doesn't exercise its veto, Israel would find itself in serious hot water very quickly. Let a couple of those puppies go through and suddenly nations around the world have "legal" permission to get very nasty toward Israel.
Personally, I don't think there's any chance Obama would let Netanyahu piss him off that much. It isn't just about Netanyahu, after all. But why would Netanyahu take that risk? Is he that sure Obama will be reasonable? Or does he think Obama is his poodle?
Guardian