ThisOriginally posted by LutherAce:
the point allotment for this is incredible...
you could have 10 #5 seeds and only have 100pts left over to improve, which eliminates any #1 seed from being picked...
it's nearly impossible to choose any #1 seed and expect to have any resemblance of a decent team...
Originally posted by 9Hawks:
Andegre,
I've done an NCAA pool with some friends the past few years using a similar scoring system, but through Excel. Â I'm definitely interested in utilizing your site this year but had a few questions:
1.How do I go about inviting more than 25 people? Â
2. All each person will need to do is set up an account on your site to join?
3. When are the scores going to be updated (conclusion of each round/end of tournament)?
Thanks in advance
Not arguing that point...but i'm arguing that if you go by the "avg" per weight (100pts), then selecting a #1 seed (Streibler) means that you need to find 2 7 seeds or worse to maintain the 100/pt/wt average requiredOriginally posted by buf87:
There are plenty of lower seeds that could win. Storley and Telford at #4, Clark at #6. To me it looks like who has best potential to wrestle above seed
I agree, it would have been alot better.Originally posted by slicone:
this pool would be a lot of fun...if the results were updated after each session