ADVERTISEMENT

Yet another Biden vaccine mandate gets a federal court injunction....

The Tradition

HR King
Apr 23, 2002
123,759
97,527
113
MONROE, La. (AP) — President Joe Biden cannot require teachers in the Head Start early education program to be vaccinated against COVID-19, a Louisiana federal judge ruled Saturday, handing a victory to 24 states that had sued the federal government.

U.S. District Judge Terry Doughty wrote that the Biden administration unlawfully bypassed Congress when ordering that workers in Head Start programs be vaccinated by Jan. 31 and that students 2 years or older be masked when indoors or when in close contact outdoors.

Head Start is a federally funded program that promotes education for children under the age of 6 who are from low-income families.

Doughty, an appointee of then-President Donald Trump, wrote that the separation of powers is crucial to the country’s founding and quoted former President Ronald Reagan, who said “the nine most terrifying words in the English language are, ‘I’m from the government and I’m here to help.’”

“If the Executive branch is allowed to usurp the power of the Legislative branch to make laws, then this country is no longer a democracy — it is a monarchy,” Doughty wrote.

Republican attorneys general who were among the 24 states involved in the lawsuit praised Doughty’s decision.

“This victory will help ensure that numerous Head Start programs will continue to operate rather than have to fire teachers and cut back services to children,” Alabama Attorney General Marshall said in a news release. “And this win will forestall the nonsensical and damaging practice of forcing masks on two-year-olds.”

It was not immediately clear whether the federal government would appeal the decision to the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans.

Doughty’s ruling is similar to a Friday ruling in which a federal judge also blocked the Head Start mandate in Texas.

Saturday’s ruling affects Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Utah, Wyoming and West Virginia.


Good luck requiring two-year-olds to wear masks correctly all day, lol.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 86Hawkeye
Disappointing that Iowa is on this list. Kim Reynolds says she supports vaccines but her actions undercut this message. This lawsuit, combined with Reynolds paying anti vaxxers not to work, only makes the vaccination effort more difficult.
 
Disappointing that Iowa is on this list. Kim Reynolds says she supports vaccines but her actions undercut this message. This lawsuit, combined with Reynolds paying anti vaxxers not to work, only makes the vaccination effort more difficult.

Since we now know that vaccination does not "stop the spread" (especially with omicron), then I fail to see any justification for a vaccine mandate. Yes, absolutely get the vaccine to protect yourself, but it doesn't do anything to protect others.
 
  • Like
Reactions: wjr1818
Since we now know that vaccination does not "stop the spread" (especially with omicron), then I fail to see any justification for a vaccine mandate. Yes, absolutely get the vaccine to protect yourself, but it doesn't do anything to protect others.
This isn't accurate. While the vaccine doesn't fully protect against Omicron, it still partially protects against it. And it still provides fantastic protection against the other versions of covid. In general, the vaccine does protect others.

 
This isn't accurate. While the vaccine doesn't fully protect against Omicron, it still partially protects against it. And it still provides fantastic protection against the other versions of covid. In general, the vaccine does protect others.


That "Fact Check" story was written before Omicron happened.
 
Nothing like a Facebook meme appearing in a judicial opinion.

JFC
I posted an article about this a month or so ago. Several of the rulings over vaccine mandates have had misinformation in them, and reflected a personal bias.
The law should be the law, and I understand arguments over it. However, there has been a disturbing trend to allow personal ignorance from judges to supersede the law, executive power, and deference to professional opinions in matters outside the law.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT