At the expense of the US tax payer to boot.. Any dems want to defend this one? I don't think this is going to be as well received by the voters as they think
LMAO at every single batshit link you post up here.
At the expense of the US tax payer to boot.. Any dems want to defend this one? I don't think this is going to be as well received by the voters as they think
They have had office 12 of the last 16 years, and are running on change..........
We are not going back.They have had office 12 of the last 16 years, and are running on change..........
****ing numpties.
Lots of things got ****ed up in those 4 years that still need to be changed. Just shows what a bad decision that was and would be again.They have had office 12 of the last 16 years, and are running on change..........
****ing numpties.
At the expense of the US tax payer to boot.. Any dems want to defend this one? I don't think this is going to be as well received by the voters as they think
They have had office 12 of the last 16 years, and are running on change..........
****ing numpties.
It is quite entertaining and worth it to not put him on ignore…LMAO at every single batshit link you post up here.
My content is undoubtedly a tierIt is quite entertaining and worth it to not put him on ignore…