Bad News For The CIA

[Scruddy]

Not going to be a fun news cycle for the CIA and this raises some very serious questions about the agency and their behaviors in general.



I doubt we will ever know exactly how far the corruption runs but maybe we will get some answers at least.

 

[St. Louis Hawk]

If you can’t trust OP and James O’Keefe, who can you trust?

 

[Joes Place]

If you can’t trust OP and James O’Keefe, who can you trust?

Barely more than a month after they settled their PA lawsuit over fake voter fraud claims...


"Done....Done.......On to the next one!!!"

Scruddy will fall for the next one, too....

 

[ottumwan in tx]

you mean the CIA who shot and killed jfk and rfk and mlk? and more than likely did okc? ok....

 

[wilson reborn]

you mean the CIA who shot and killed jfk and rfk and mlk? and more than likely did okc? ok....

OIT I thought you retired to the sports boards

 

[St. Louis Hawk]

OIT I thought you retired to the sports boards

We should be so lucky.

 

[Torg]

The CIA KNEW that Trump would give sensitive information to Putin

 

[ottumwan in tx]

OIT I thought you retired to the sports boards

I did until 2024 rolled around... election season!! I am back beotches

 

[goldmom]

Do we think the CIA gives a damn?

 

[wausauhawk]

I saw a thread started by Scruddy, the last response by ottumwan, & I still opened it.

 

[biggreydogs]

 

[Scruddy]

Michael Shellenberger doing some great reporting per usual

 

[Scruddy]

Do we think the CIA gives a damn?

I think the answer is actually yes, but to what extent. They'll probably just cause a few more college riots to keep people distracted until the next news cycle and everybody moves on anyways.

 

[Joes Place]

View embedded media

Michael Shellenberger doing some great reporting per usual

Keyword here: "Trump Associates" = Russian assets and spies

Exactly who the CIA should be spying on...

 

[goldmom]

View embedded media

They oughta know what psycho is. “Look at me look at me “.

 

[goldmom]

I think the answer is actually yes, but to what extent. They'll probably just cause a few more college riots to keep people distracted until the next news cycle and everybody moves on anyways.

Sorry Charlie. That ain’t the CIA but unless the CIA is totally worthless I think they and the NSA know who the professionals are who are funding and organizing those.
They better. That’s what we’re paying them to do.

 

[Scruddy]

Sorry Charlie. That ain’t the CIA but unless the CIA is totally worthless I think they and the NSA know who the professionals are who are funding and organizing those.
They better. That’s what we’re paying them to do.

Domestic terrorism is more of the FBI's domain at that level to be fair.

 

[ping72]

Glad to know the CIA is taking national security seriously and puts it over the narcissistic desires of an office holder.

Call me crazy… but if the POTUS is a security risk, I want the CIA to treat them as such.

 

[poophawk]

sane people know trump is dirty and will sell out anyone including the usa, well played cia

 

[Rifler]

Call me crazy… but if the POTUS is a security risk, I want the CIA to treat them as such.

So then I'm sure you would agree that given his history, Biden's access to sensitive documents should be strictly limited?...

 

[Joes Place]

So then I'm sure you would agree that given his history, Biden's access to sensitive documents should be strictly limited?...

Biden never tried to conceal documents from the FBI, nor did he intentionally steal them.

Trump did both.

What is so confusing for you on this topic?

 

[hexumhawk]

The alphabet agencies need broken into a million pieces.

 

[ihawk in FWB]

O'Keef? Hasn't he been tried and convicted already?

 

[Scruddy]

Biden never tried to conceal documents from the FBI, nor did he intentionally steal them.

Trump did both.

What is so confusing for you on this topic?

You're legitimately trying to claim he only had boxes of classified documents by accident?

 

[thewop]

If MSNBC doesn't say it it's not true

 

[Hans81]

View embedded media

Those two women are real pussies. 😜

 

[Rifler]

Biden never tried to conceal documents from the FBI, nor did he intentionally steal them.

The FBI didn't know that Biden had his documents, so yes they were being concealed from the FBI,.. Also, unless you're saying that Biden is mentally impaired, he did intentionally take these documents,.. When a person intentionally takes possession of something that doesn't belong to them, prior to return, these objects can accurately be described as stolen..

 

[joelbc1]

If you can’t trust OP and James O’Keefe, who can you trust?

Or Matt Goetz…..

 

[Joes Place]

You're legitimately trying to claim he only had boxes of classified documents by accident?

I'm explaining he did not "hide" them (nor did Pence) and both parties allowed voluntary searches for documents that were found.

In Trump's case, he HID them, he KNEW he had them, and he tried to prevent the FBI from accessing them.
Not remotely the same thing.

 

[Scruddy]

I'm explaining he did not "hide" them (nor did Pence) and both parties allowed voluntary searches for documents that were found.

In Trump's case, he HID them, he KNEW he had them, and he tried to prevent the FBI from accessing them.
Not remotely the same thing.

You're so grossly ignorant lmfao

 

[Joes Place]

The FBI didn't know that Biden had his documents, so yes they were being concealed from the FBI

Uh, no. Biden didn't know he had documents. Nor did Pence.

Both volunteered for FBI to search. Trump actively prevented recovery of documents. Lied about it. MOVED THEM AROUND to keep FBI from getting them.

 

[Scruddy]

Uh, no. Biden didn't know he had documents. Nor did Pence.

Both volunteered for FBI to search. Trump actively prevented recovery of documents. Lied about it. MOVED THEM AROUND to keep FBI from getting them.

"Omg guys he didn't know he stole those even though they were sitting out in the open in the middle of his garage!!!"

Lmfao imagine trying to unironically push such nonsense.

 

[Joes Place]

When a person intentionally takes possession of something that doesn't belong to them, prior to return, these objects can accurately be described as stolen..

Nope.

Not the case for either Biden, or Pence. There was no grounds for "intent", because neither tried to obfuscate or hide the documents.

In Trump's case, they have dozens of examples of trying to hide them AND make unsubstantiated claims that the documents were his. That explicitly demonstrates "intent".

 

[joelbc1]

You're so grossly ignorant lmfao

Why do you “LMFAO” whenever you cannot answer a question scruffy? What did Joe say that you find funny?
You claim Biden knew he has secret documents hidden but Trump didn’t….even after the archive folks advised Trump they knew he had illegally removed “secret documents” from the WH….how can a person be so dumb…..Trump, not you (this time).

 

[Rifler]

Uh, no. Biden didn't know he had documents.

So you do agree that the potato in chief is mentally impaired...

 

[Rifler]

In Trump's case, they have dozens of examples of trying to hide them...

Not true,.. Government knew what Trump had and at one point in their negotiations even requested that the documents be put in a more secure condition..

 

[Joes Place]

So you do agree that the potato in chief is mentally impaired...

Not anymore than Pence was, who also did not know he had any such documents.
Nor did he attempt to conceal them.

 

[Joes Place]

Not true,.. Government knew what Trump had

No; they did not. They knew SOME of what Trump had.

 

[Joes Place]

at one point in their negotiations even requested that the documents be put in a more secure condition..

WHY DID HE NOT JUST TURN THEM OVER, LIKE BOTH BIDEN AND PENCE DID?

 

[Rifler]

Not anymore than Pence was, who also did not know he had any such documents.
Nor did he attempt to conceal them.

Good,.. glad you agree that Biden is senile and crooked as the day is long.