ADVERTISEMENT

Biden's Budget Deficit Soars to Staggering $2 Trillion, Threatening America's Financial Stability!

RicoSuave102954

HR All-American
Jul 17, 2023
3,497
2,673
113
Montezuma, Iowa
AS IF THINGS AREN'T BAD ENOUGH the federal budget deficit has doubled to $2 trillion under President Biden in just a year, significantly impacting the economy and the financial well-being of Americans.

Official and Unofficial Numbers​

Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen announced a deficit of $1.7 trillion for fiscal 2023. However, $300 billion in student debt cancellations makes the actual deficit $2 trillion.

Last year’s budget deficit, adjusted for the same student debt factors, was less than $1 trillion, showing an alarming rise in a single year.

Unprecedented Increase​

Remarkably, this doubling occurred without a recession or war to explain the fiscal surge. A large part of this increase is due to inflationary spending by the federal government.

The size of the U.S. national debt is now as big as the country’s annual economic output, known as GDP.

The Cost to Taxpayers​

While inflation erodes the buying power of average Americans, the wealthiest generation is benefiting from federal spending.

Notably, Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid saw increases in spending by 11%, 12%, and 4%, respectively.

Federal Reserve’s Counteraction​

The Federal Reserve raised interest rates to over 5% to combat inflation, reducing it to around 4%, which is still double the Federal Reserve’s target.

As a result of the rate hikes, the government had to pay an additional $184 billion in interest on the debt compared to the previous year. Additionally, banks like Silicon Valley Bank and First Republic had to pay an extra $101 billion to depositors who were unprepared for the rate hikes.

The deficit also grew partly due to a decrease in federal revenue, primarily caused by the higher interest rates.

Stock Market Woes​

Income tax revenue fell by 9.3% because of lower capital gains attributed to stock market uncertainty. While rising bond yields indicate that creditors might stop supporting U.S. debt without higher returns, pressuring the government to curb spending.

The Structural Problem​

Demographic factors and entitlement structures have been pushing the U.S. towards fiscal issues for years.

Biden’s policies and the bipartisan tendency to borrow have aggravated the existing deficit problems.

If the government doesn’t take heed, it’s the everyday American who will bear the brunt through reduced purchasing power, higher interest rates, and financial insecurity.

This rapid increase in the federal deficit has far-reaching implications, not just for the government, but for the financial stability and future of every American. Immediate action is needed to address these fiscal challenges and prevent further harm.



 
  • Haha
Reactions: SocraticIshmael
Actually, "basic math" would imply that both are options.

But your article calls out Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid. Which of those should we cut?
Did the article call for the cutting of Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid? I must have overlooked that part.

Your response is just another quote from the Liberals Guidebook of Talking Points.

When Conservatives speak about deficit spending Democrats pull out and dust off scare tactic #1 which is cutting elderly folks Social Security.

Republicans will not cut Social Security so it's time to move on to a new scheme for the Democrats to rollout.
 
It's almost as if lowering taxes 6 years ago has actually decreased the revenue stream. How weird.

Yeah, that is totally the problem. And if it were, you would think it would have been addressed by now. How long has Joe been in office?
 
  • Like
Reactions: RicoSuave102954
We need Rico's preferred presidential candidate in the white house. Surely, they will cut spending and get the budget under control.
 
Actually, "basic math" would imply that both are options.

But your article calls out Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid. Which of those should we cut?
Since you are big on "basic math" show us how tax revenues can fix the issue?

Also, how about the President's executive orders that increase spending with no revenue to support it.



These projections also tell the cautionary tale that tax increases alone cannot cover the rising cost of federal spending. Even after the 2017 tax cuts expire, CBO projects the annual deficit to reach $2.7 trillion in 2033. President Biden’s 2023 budget proposed about $1.7 trillion in new taxes over ten years, about half of which would come from raising the corporate tax rate from 21 percent to 28 percent. Setting aside the economic cost of raising taxes on American employers, even the Biden Administration’s politically unrealistic proposed tax increases would only cover about 8 percent of the CBO’s projected 10‐year deficit.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RicoSuave102954
Did the article call for the cutting of Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid? I must have overlooked that part.

Your response is just another quote from the Liberals Guidebook of Talking Points.

When Conservatives speak about deficit spending Democrats pull out and dust off scare tactic #1 which is cutting elderly folks Social Security.

Republicans will not cut Social Security so it's time to move on to a new scheme for the Democrats to rollout.

If Conservatives are really serious about getting the budget under control they need to start making the sacrifices when they are in charge. Cut spending to their pet projects such as defense. Start raising taxes on the rich.

We've had 2 super massive tax cuts for the rich since I've become an adult. Maybe we should go back to pre George W Bush tax levels.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MilleGinja
We need Rico's preferred presidential candidate in the white house. Surely, they will cut spending and get the budget under control.
True, neither party cares, might as well at least be honest about it. The current White House is projecting $2 Trillion deficits and more, there is nothing that can be done to reduce it at this point. Just keep printing money and spend more. The cycle continues
 
If Conservatives are really serious about getting the budget under control they need to start making the sacrifices when they are in charge. Cut spending to their pet projects such as defense. Start raising taxes on the rich.

We've had 2 super massive tax cuts for the rich since I've become an adult. Maybe we should go back to pre George W Bush tax levels.
Put down your liberal talking points pamphlet, the tax cuts were done across the board.

We're facing a possible WWIII so cutting defense spending is the last thing we should be doing.
 
If Conservatives are really serious about getting the budget under control they need to start making the sacrifices when they are in charge. Cut spending to their pet projects such as defense. Start raising taxes on the rich.

We've had 2 super massive tax cuts for the rich since I've become an adult. Maybe we should go back to pre George W Bush tax levels.
Maybe, there is not enough to tax to pay for $2 Trillion deficits. This is what everyone wants, spend and spend,
Revenues have been done some due to fewer capital gains as the market went down and more losses claimed.


The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) released an update to its budget and economic projections, reflecting changing economic conditions and new legislation.

The report shows that U.S. federal revenues are projected to remain at or above historic levels. In 2022, revenues reached a two‐decade high of 19.6 percent of gross domestic product (GDP). At a time of historically high revenues, it should be clear to policymakers that uncontrolled spending is the primary culprit for persistent deficits and debt.
 
Maybe, there is not enough to tax to pay for $2 Trillion deficits. This is what everyone wants, spend and spend,
Revenues have been done some due to fewer capital gains as the market went down and more losses claimed.


The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) released an update to its budget and economic projections, reflecting changing economic conditions and new legislation.

The report shows that U.S. federal revenues are projected to remain at or above historic levels. In 2022, revenues reached a two‐decade high of 19.6 percent of gross domestic product (GDP). At a time of historically high revenues, it should be clear to policymakers that uncontrolled spending is the primary culprit for persistent deficits and debt.
we spend too much.

Unfortunately the cost of servicing the debt is just snowballing so we're screwed.

Sooner or later we're gonna have to increase taxes and take austerity measures. I wouldn't want to be President in 2024-28 cuz that shit sandwich is gonna have to be eaten probably sooner than anyone thinks...
 
  • Like
Reactions: LetsGoHawks83
Maybe, there is not enough to tax to pay for $2 Trillion deficits. This is what everyone wants, spend and spend,
Revenues have been done some due to fewer capital gains as the market went down and more losses claimed.


The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) released an update to its budget and economic projections, reflecting changing economic conditions and new legislation.

The report shows that U.S. federal revenues are projected to remain at or above historic levels. In 2022, revenues reached a two‐decade high of 19.6 percent of gross domestic product (GDP). At a time of historically high revenues, it should be clear to policymakers that uncontrolled spending is the primary culprit for persistent deficits and debt.

I think tax increases and spending decreases are the only way to balance the budget. But the side who constantly complains about the budget isn't willing to make those choices when they were in charge.

We were already running a deficit when the Republicans cut taxes the last time. The percent of GDP we collect is much lower than most other industrialized nations.

Revenue increases are going to happen because the economy is growing anyways.
 
Put down your liberal talking points pamphlet, the tax cuts were done across the board.

We're facing a possible WWIII so cutting defense spending is the last thing we should be doing.

Oh please any World War 3 is going to be fought with nukes which don't cost very much to upkeep.
 
It's almost as if lowering taxes 6 years ago has actually decreased the revenue stream. How weird.
And yet untrue. How weird. What do you think is more important, the tax rate, or the amount of taxes collected?

2017 Individual income taxes as % of GDP collected: 8.2%
2022 Individual income taxes as % of GDP collected: 10.5%
2023 Individual income taxes as % of GDP collected estimate: 8.8%

2017 Federal outlays as % of GDP: 20.7%
2022 Federal outlays as % of GDP: 25.1%
2023 Federal outlays as % of GDP estimate: 24.2%
 
Repeal the Bush and Trump tax cuts = problem solved
No it doesn't, because the Feds have never collected more than 20% of GDP in taxes.
We have spending in excess of 24% of GDP predicted for the rest of the decade.

Spending has grown too large.
Tax collection in 2022 was 19.6% of GDP.
In 1999 federal spending was 18% of GDP.

We have a spending problem.
 
No it doesn't, because the Feds have never collected more than 20% of GDP in taxes.
We have spending in excess of 24% of GDP predicted for the rest of the decade.

Spending has grown too large.
Tax collection in 2022 was 19.6% of GDP.
In 1999 federal spending was 18% of GDP.

We have a spending problem.


mmm if only we could think for a second of what's changed since 1999
 
mmm if only we could think for a second of what's changed since 1999
Defense spending in 2000 was 2.9% of GDP.
Defense spending in 2022 is 3% of GDP.

Debt as % of GDP in 2000 was 33%.
Debt as % of GDP in 2022 was 129%.

interest%20payment%20on%20debt.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: DogBoyRy
Defense spending in 2000 was 2.9% of GDP.
Defense spending in 2022 is 3% of GDP.

Debt as % of GDP in 2000 was 33%.
Debt as % of GDP in 2022 was 129%.

interest%20payment%20on%20debt.jpg

Yep defense spending only thing that changed in 20 years.

God, simpleton's like you are the worst.
 
Yep defense spending only thing that changed in 20 years.

God, simpleton's like you are the worst.
I find coy know-it-alls the worst.

Step off Olympus and enlighten the knaves on the source of our unsustainable spending.
 
I find coy know-it-alls the worst.

Step off Olympus and enlighten the knaves on the source of our unsustainable spending.

well a majority of our spending went from discretionary to mandatory in the last half century. Do you know what's mandatory includes? things such as social security. In 1999 there were 34.59 million retirees. Nearly 50 million last year. A number that is only going to rise. Medicare is also in mandatory spending, something we require of all old people, a population we have established that has gone up and up.

So no its not just defense spending that has caused the increase. It was a switch from discretionary being the majority to mandatory, a massive increase in retirees, two wars, a massive recession, a pandemic that have all contributed to an increase in spending.

Anyone with a high school knowledge of simple current event would know this. You don't have to live on Olympus to understand recent history or what is happening.

But keep whining about spending please, and making it discretionary which is a drop compared to mandatory. Really helps show you know what you are talking about.
 
And yet untrue. How weird. What do you think is more important, the tax rate, or the amount of taxes collected?

2017 Individual income taxes as % of GDP collected: 8.2%
2022 Individual income taxes as % of GDP collected: 10.5%
2023 Individual income taxes as % of GDP collected estimate: 8.8%

2017 Federal outlays as % of GDP: 20.7%
2022 Federal outlays as % of GDP: 25.1%
2023 Federal outlays as % of GDP estimate: 24.2%
Caution
Libtards hate facts and data.
 
He said he would tax the rich to pay for his stuff.

Maybe next term.

Revenue has consistently gone up. Just not enough I guess.
The problem with taxing the rich is the rich still don't have enough money to pay for everything. That, and spending always increases more than additional taxation.

The proven best was to increase tax revenue is to increase GDP.

We have a spending problem, not a revenue problem.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DogBoyRy
well a majority of our spending went from discretionary to mandatory in the last half century. Do you know what's mandatory includes? things such as social security.

Social Security outlays in 2022 were 5% of GDP, while revenues were only 4.4% of GDP. The program has been burning through the 'reserves' basically since the housing crisis.
This requires the issuance of debt to the public (replacing the intragovernmental debt) to provide cash, but the total debt issuance isn't actually changing in this case, and won't change. SSI is funded by payroll taxes, when the reserves of intra-governmental debt (excess tax collections from earlier years) are burned through the law stipulates benefits are cut to match the revenue.

In 1999 there were 34.59 million retirees. Nearly 50 million last year. A number that is only going to rise. Medicare is also in mandatory spending, something we require of all old people, a population we have established that has gone up and up.

Too bad the Democrats foisted a Ponzi scheme on us to take care them, eh?
FDR was a cancer on this country that continues to metastasize.

So no its not just defense spending that has caused the increase. It was a switch from discretionary being the majority to mandatory, a massive increase in retirees, two wars, a massive recession, a pandemic that have all contributed to an increase in spending.

Anyone with a high school knowledge of simple current event would know this. You don't have to live on Olympus to understand recent history or what is happening.

But keep whining about spending please, and making it discretionary which is a drop compared to mandatory. Really helps show you know what you are talking about.
Overall federal spending is 20% higher than the Feds have EVER collected in taxes. It must be cut.

1W0rBrc.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: DogBoyRy
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT