ADVERTISEMENT

Climate Hoax

Sharky1203

HR All-American
Silver Member
Sep 14, 2023
2,881
2,345
113

False claim 'climate crisis hoax' statement signed by thousands of scientists | Fact check​

Story by Kate S. Petersen, USA TODAY

The claim: Thousands of scientists sign 'climate crisis hoax' document​

ASept. 14 article (direct link, archive link) circulating on Facebook claims a large group of scientists downplayed the dangers of climate change in a signed declaration.

"Thousands of Scientists Unite to Expose ‘Climate Crisis’ Hoax," reads the headline of the article, which was published on the website News Addicts.

The article was shared more than 400 times in six weeks on Facebook, according to Crowdtangle, a social media analytics tool.

Our rating: False​

Thousands of scientists did not sign the document referenced in the article. The document lists only around 1,600 purported signatories, the vast majority of whom have no listed expertise in climate science. Hundreds of the purported signatories are not listed as being scientists of any kind, according to a USA TODAY count.

'Declaration' signed by engineers, medical workers and wine steward​

While the article's headline references "thousands of scientists," the article's text states that only 1,609 scientists "gathered together to sign a declaration, proclaiming that 'there is no climate emergency.'"

The document, published by the Global Climate Intelligence Group in August, describes the purported signatories as "scientists and professionals," not just "scientists." USA TODAY found hundreds of examples of listed signatories that were not described as scientists − including engineers, medical workers, psychologists, lawyers, architects, philosophers, teachers and information technology and business professionals.

The intelligence group did not respond to USA TODAY questions about the number of scientists and climate and atmospheric scientists, specifically, who signed the document.

USA TODAY found around 100 purported signatories listed as having college degrees in the fields of climate science, climatology, meteorology, paleoclimatology, environmental science, atmospheric science or atmospheric physics or as being scientists in those fields.

More than a dozen additional signatories were listed as "climate researchers." Many of these individuals were also listed as retired from other, unrelated professions or were listed as "independent."

Other signatories listed credentials far outside climate science. Titles listed include:

  • Senior ship designer
  • Financial advice specialist
  • Leadership development and coaching
  • Sculptor, designer and innovator
  • Commercial fisherman
  • Airline pilot
  • Sommelier
  • Historical linguist
  • Lifetime explorer of truth
  • IT professional
  • PhD in mental health
AFP analyzed a version of the document last year, when it had around 1,200 purported signatories. At that time, six of the listed individuals were deceased, AFP reported.

Reality of climate change supported by thousands of peer-reviewed papers​

Modern global warming − which is causing polar ice melt, sea level rise, and increased heat wave frequency − has been documented by multiple independent research organizations. The warming is caused by an increase in atmospheric greenhouse gas concentrations due to human behavior.

These facts are supported by the 2021 Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change report, which investigated and outlined the most contemporary climate and climate change science available.

"It is unequivocal that human influence has warmed the atmosphere, ocean and land," reads the report. "Human-induced climate change is already affecting many weather and climate extremes in every region across the globe. Evidence of observed changes in extremes such as heatwaves, heavy precipitation, droughts and tropical cyclones, and, in particular, their attribution to human influence, has strengthened."

The report cites nearly 13,000 peer-reviewed papers as well as hundreds of technical reports and books, according to a 2023 analysis from the climate change panel. Taken collectively, these citations include the work of around 39,000 unique authors, Sarah Connors, who co-authored the analysis and now works for the European Space Agency, told USA TODAY.


Most of the citations − more than 9,000 − are from the fields of earth and planetary science (which include climate science and atmospheric science disciplines) and environmental science. The rest are related to agricultural science, biological science, biochemistry, genetics, molecular biology, energy, the social sciences and medicine, are considered "multidisciplinary" or are undefined by the analysis.

Fact check: Greenland's Petermann Glacier is shrinking; movement doesn't mean it's growing

USA TODAY reached out News Addicts for comment but did not immediately receive a response

Our fact-check sources:​

 
  • Haha
Reactions: NoWokeBloke
Skanky with another post that isn’t linked. I’m sure it’s a non-biased source.
Confused Major League Soccer GIF by Sporting KC
 
There IS an environmental crisis and it's that our air, our water, our food and our medicines have all been made toxic.

But trying to blame carbon dioxide - an element that is basic to human life - and saying it's destroying our global climate? Sheer ignorance. GTFO. 🤣
 
But trying to blame carbon dioxide - an element that is basic to human life - and saying it's destroying our global climate?

Svante Arrhenius actually proved it would warm the climate >100 years ago, dipshit.

And scientists were aware of this due to fossil fuels burning since the early 1900s.

All of that information has been posted for you here in the past.
 
There IS an environmental crisis and it's that our air, our water, our food and our medicines have all been made toxic.

But trying to blame carbon dioxide - an element that is basic to human life - and saying it's destroying our global climate? Sheer ignorance. GTFO. 🤣
You really shouldn't feel proud about showing your ignorance like that.
 
Svante Arrhenius actually proved it would warm the climate >100 years ago, dipshit.

And scientists were aware of this due to fossil fuels burning since the early 1900s.

All of that information has been posted for you here in the past.
He proved that CO2 would was warmer than air. Large concentrations of CO2 caused a warming effect. We are far from large concentrations worldwide. We are however getting large concentrations in heavy urban areas.
 
There IS an environmental crisis and it's that our air, our water, our food and our medicines have all been made toxic.

But trying to blame carbon dioxide - an element that is basic to human life - and saying it's destroying our global climate? Sheer ignorance. GTFO. 🤣
Well, almost every expert in this area of study disagree with your opinion on this, so there's that.

I'm sure you'll persuade some of the smaller minds here @ GIAOT to your side eventually with your unimpeachable information.
 
Obviously, the side that uses teenagers with autism to be their climate experts are the ones with all the science and data at their disposal, right?

CO2 feeds the plants. The plants and the oxygen they produce sustain us. Destroying CO2 destroys life.

Bunch'a 🤡🤡🤡's
 
It is not a coherent sentence.

Try again.
Jesus, when CO2 is contained in a container, it becomes warmer that the atmosphere surrounding it. CO2 is easily dispersed when released from containment. Thus, the levels of CO2 would have to be astronomical. That is all he said. When he was doing the studies, CO2 levels weren't, and issue and they were unclear on what levels or even where it came from. He just knew that if a very large amount was ever contained in a concentrated area, then it would cause warming. Somehow Libs have twisted his study into Climate warming/cooling/change or whatever you're calling it today.
 
Jesus, when CO2 is contained in a container, it becomes warmer that the atmosphere surrounding it.

LOLWUT?

You really have no idea what you are talking about here.
CO2 "contained in a container" doesn't "just warm up" randomly.
 
Internal documents show that oil companies knew in the 1970s that burning fossil fuels would warm the Earth's climate significantly. In spite of this, there are numerous climate change deniers who continue to play along with the oil companies' misinformation campaign that began in the 1990s. The way they pride themselves on their willful ignorance is weird AF.
 
I quote the nonsense you post, directly.

You are incapable of posting coherent points. It is amusing.
It isn't coherent to you because you don't understand it because it's above your reading level.. So, you defect your lack of intellect by miss quoting.

Remember you're the one who thinks because birds change colors, they want to be trans.
 
Yup climate change is just a hoax so science dorks can keep getting tax dollars after failing at figuring out how to colonize Mars already
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT