Yale In NCAA Tournament
- Thread starter IowaHawkeyeFBnBB4Life
- Start date
Must be a Harvard man?
All I can come up with is a couple of the brackets I saw today had the Hawks playing Yale in the first round.
More than a few Iowa / Yale - 5 / 12 predictions. Yale famous for knocking someone out in a previous NCAA tourney, can't remember who or exactly when.
We could be a 1 seed and you’d be the guy saying we should be really worried about the 16 seed.
None of this bothers me.
If Iowa gets a #4 seed and gets upset by a #13....then it is because they were not prepared.
If Iowa gets a #4 seed and gets upset by a #13....then it is because they were not prepared.
Whoever wins the Ivy League gets in, you don't know that? And many other leagues, too.
So....a Missouri Valley school made the final four. Different years, different teams.
There is a reason why Yale, Princeton or whichever Ivy League school gets the bid that they will be seeded a 14 seed in the NCAA tourney. Why? Because they arent good enough to be seeded any higher.
Could they win another game? Sure, but I would bet against they winning.
QUOTE="TheTruthTheWholeTruth, post: 7360770, member: 95035"]They beat Baylor back in 2016.[/QUOTE]
There is a reason why Yale, Princeton or whichever Ivy League school gets the bid that they will be seeded a 14 seed in the NCAA tourney. Why? Because they arent good enough to be seeded any higher.
Could they win another game? Sure, but I would bet against they winning.
QUOTE="TheTruthTheWholeTruth, post: 7360770, member: 95035"]They beat Baylor back in 2016.[/QUOTE]
Have you even watched Yale play this year?
I haven't but looking at their team, the best player player appears to be a 6'10" 220 lb. forward.
JMO but I think Luka would probably score about 35 on him. And if they tried triple teaming him I think CJ, Weezy and Connor would make them pay.
Who on earth cares about a random bracketology prediction in early February? A month ago these teams were completely different and a month from now they will be completely different. Makes no sense to even debate this.
Similar threads
