Yeah, people like pajama boy are hard to tell one way or another. But, that is the look and vibe they are going for now. They want to eliminate masculinity. WeirdosShe seems a lot like a liberal female to me.
Oh yeah, pajama boy is def a liberal metro, but just saying, the chick in the vid gave off a liberal vibe as well.Yeah, people like pajama boy are hard to tell one way or another. But, that is the look and vibe they are going for now. They want to eliminate masculinity. Weirdos
Woo Hoo!! I'm not a liberal male!!
The abortions aren't free if someone else is paying for it. I know you guys like to make sure that babies are never born, but the price to that thinking is that YOU should be paying the bill. Not asking us to help you do it.None of those 'stereotypes' apply to me. Well except the free abortion one. Abortions are so much fun and dead babies are effing delicious.
The abortions aren't free if someone else is paying for it. I know you guys like to make sure that babies are never born, but the price to that thinking is that YOU should be paying the bill. Not asking us to help you do it.
The pink hair totally goes against the GOP Stereotype for sure. She could probably walk into a liberal parade and be totally accepted without question, where an older white male in a suit would be met with skepticism.She seems a lot like a liberal female to me.
This is an interesting idea that I've given no thought to so here goes:The abortions aren't free if someone else is paying for it. I know you guys like to make sure that babies are never born, but the price to that thinking is that YOU should be paying the bill. Not asking us to help you do it.
She seems a lot like a liberal female to me.
This is an interesting idea that I've given no thought to so here goes:
Come tax time, we all file taxes and figure out how much taxes we personally pay. We are then presented a list of all government programs, and we get to assign amounts to how much of our own tax dollars we want to put to each government programs. The ones that go unfunded, go unfunded, and the ones that get money, get money. True government by the people, for the people.
well there goes any thought I had of writing my senators to push this idea.This won't work. Mostly because you would see certain popular programs over funded while other unpopular things would get almost no money at all.
I mean think about it. . . who's going to fill out on their taxes that they want their money to go pay for congress people's salaries or the salaries of their staffers? Who's gonna want to fund the IRS?
You would see the pet political projects of each party get nearly all the money while several boring but necessary things would be ignored.
Plus there is the issue of how detailed your list of government programs would be, if it was real detailed it would be hundreds of pages in length. Would we just put "department of transportation" or would be break it down to the NTSB, the FAA, etc etc.
Works for me. I'd like to see people in office put up for performance reports as well, that would be used to guage what they've done, and those reports will decide whether they should get to keep their jobs, via a poll taken by the people. If they go below 50% approval, they're gone. Do it once a year, and have the next guy in line election wise, take his place.This is an interesting idea that I've given no thought to so here goes:
Come tax time, we all file taxes and figure out how much taxes we personally pay. We are then presented a list of all government programs, and we get to assign amounts to how much of our own tax dollars we want to put to each government programs. The ones that go unfunded, go unfunded, and the ones that get money, get money. True government by the people, for the people.