ADVERTISEMENT

2014-15 B1G Revenue up 32%; long standing members got $32.4M each (The Big 12? $23.3M ea)

Franisdaman

HB King
Nov 3, 2012
101,071
138,059
113
Heaven, Iowa
Big Ten saw big increased revenue in 2014-15, team payments on par with SEC
The Big Ten fell just short of the SEC in 2014-15, paying out its longstanding members $32.4 million each two seasons ago


by Jon Solomon

The Big Ten generated $448.8 million in revenue during 2014-15, a 32-percent increase over one year for college sports' second-wealthiest conference behind the SEC.

In the first year with Maryland and Rutgers as members -- coinciding with the debut of the College Football Playoff -- the Big Ten took in $110 million more than in 2013-14, according to tax records provided Wednesday to CBS Sports. The league paid its 11 longstanding members about $32.4 million each.

That's on par with the SEC's payout of $32.7 million and considerably more than the Pac-12 ($25.1 million) and Big 12 ($23.3 million). The SEC generated $527.4 million in revenue last year. The ACC is the only major conference yet to release its tax records.

The money will only increase for the Big Ten, which is separating itself financially with the SEC from the other Power Five conferences. Last month,SportsBusiness Journal reported the Big Ten is close to signing a deal with Fox for half of its media rights at a value of $250 million a year over six years. The second half of the TV deal will show exactly how wealthy the Big Ten will be.

One of the major questions in the ongoing negotiations is whether the Big Ten will still have a major presence on ESPN. SportsBusiness Journal reported that ESPN offered a low bid for the Big Ten rights. ESPN has said it wants to remain partners with the Big Ten for a long time.

"We're interested in having great partners that have great platforms who are interested in marketing and promotion," Big Ten commissioner Jim Delany said Wednesday at the Big Ten spring meetings, according to the Detroit Free-Press. "The market will decide what happens. It's a new day, and we've approached it that way."

In the latest tax return, Delany was credited with $2.6 million in total compensation. That's down from nearly $3.4 million in 2013-14, when Delany received a $1 million bonus and was credited with $833,333 as deferred payment from previous years.

Last year, Delany's salary was $1,905,436 (down about $151,000 from 2013-14). He also received $273,900 in deferred compensation, $42,100 in other reportable compensation, and $40,964 in nontaxable benefits.

Delany's compensation total means Pac-12 commissioner Larry Scott likely remained the highest-paid commissioner in 2014-15. Earlier Wednesday, thePac-12's tax return showed Scott became the first $4 million-a-year commissioner at $4.05 million. Then-SEC commissioner Mike Slive received $3.6 million, and Big 12 commissioner Bob Bowlsby made $2.6 million.

Penn State was back to being fully funded by the Big Ten after getting docked almost $3 million a year earlier due to NCAA sanctions. The Big Ten's three newest members are on different paths toward receiving full shares: Maryland ($24.1 million), Nebraska ($19.8 million) and Rutgers ($10.5 million).

Maryland also received an $11.6 million loan from the Big Ten. Maryland settled a lawsuit with the ACC and agreed to pay $31 million in exit fees to leave for the Big Ten.

Rutgers did not experience a major financial jump by moving to the Big Ten -- at least not yet. It went from $8.3 million in the American Athletic Conference to $10.5 million in the Big Ten. More significant money is eventually coming, but for 2014-15, Rutgers got paid more like a Group of Five school than a Power Five school.

The Big Ten reported $21.5 million in 2014-15 income from investment in the Big Ten Network, up from $12.4 million a year earlier. Those amounts do not include annual rights fees the Big Ten receives from the network. Fox owns 51 percent of the Big Ten Network.

The Big Ten's net assets as of June 30, 2015, were $63.7 million. That was up from $52.1 million a year earlier.

Big Ten deputy commissioner Brad Traviolia remained the conference office's second-highest paid employee at $464,879 in total compensation, up 19 percent from 2013-14. Other high-paid employees: chief communication officer Diane Dietz ($298,136, up 11 percent); associate commissioner Mark Rudner ($247,821, up 3 percent); and associate commissioner Rick Boyages ($241,132, up 1 percent). Traviolia and Dietz accrued deferred compensation for a supplemental non-qualified retirement plan.

In addition, the Big Ten reported spending $2.3 million on legal services with Mayer Brown LLP. That's up from $1.1 million in 2013-14. The Big Ten spent about $5.1 million in legal costs over four years from 2011-12 to 2014-15. The Big Ten, like other conferences, has been a defendant in lawsuits over changing the NCAA rules restricting college athletes from being paid. That's the one place in college sports where the market doesn't dictate compensation amounts.

"The Conference is subject to certain legal proceedings and claims which have arisen in the ordinary course of its operations," the Big Ten wrote on its recent tax return. "In the opinion of the Conference's officials, the proceedings and claims will not have a material impact on the Conference's financial position or results of activities."

full article: http://www.cbssports.com/college-fo...ent-in-2014-15-team-payments-on-par-with-sec/
 
Last edited:
From the article in the original post, it states that the B1G paid its 11 longstanding members about $32.4 million each. That's on par with the SEC's payout of $32.7 million and considerably more than the Pac-12 ($25.1 million) and Big 12 ($23.3 million).

Yet, in another tread, Lonely Clown says, and I quote: "As I said, right now the Big XII, SEC and BiG are pretty much the same in terms of payouts to members."

How can you guys take Lonely Clown seriously? Time after time he has shown that he lies, makes stuff up, is ignorant when not making stuff up and has zero credibility, yet posters on here interact with him. Makes no sense. And another thing that makes no sense? A CLOWN fan posting non stop on a Hawkeye site, with little facts, a lot of lies, a lot of ignorance and a lot of B.S.

Page 2 of this thread is where I quoted Lonely Clown: https://iowa.forums.rivals.com/threads/big-12-expansion.125796/page-2
 
Last edited:
From the article in the original post, it states that the B1G paid its 11 longstanding members about $32.4 million each. That's on par with the SEC's payout of $32.7 million and considerably more than the Pac-12 ($25.1 million) and Big 12 ($23.3 million).

Yet, in another tread, Lonely Clown says, and I quote: "As I said, right now the Big XII, SEC and BiG are pretty much the same in terms of payouts to members."

How can you guys take Lonely Clown seriously? Time after time he has shown that he lies, makes stuff up, is ignorant when not making stuff up and has zero credibility, yet posters on here interact with him. Makes no sense. And another thing that makes no sense? A CLOWN fan posting non stop on a Hawkeye site, with little facts, a lot of lies, a lot of ignorance and a lot of B.S.

Page 2 of this thread is where I quoted Lonely Clown: https://iowa.forums.rivals.com/threads/big-12-expansion.125796/page-2
LC answered you on this by explaining that the average big 12 team makes an additional ~$7 million in individual tier 3 rights the $23.3 million figure omits. How can we trust you when you omit this information in your criticism?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hawk and Awe
LC answered you on this by explaining that the average big 12 team makes an additional ~$7 million in individual tier 3 rights the $23.3 million figure omits. How can we trust you when you omit this information in your criticism?

I am quoting CBSsports; I don't take Lonely Clown's word on anything; he makes crap up as he goes

I provide links to the info, too; we are supposed to simply take LC's word for it?
 
I am quoting CBSsports; I don't take Lonely Clown's word on anything; he makes crap up as he goes

I provide links to the info, too; we are supposed to simply take LC's word for it?
Then reserch big 12 tier 3 rights and report how he is wrong. Ignoring his explanation just makes you as uncredible as you claim he is.
 
I found this story from a year ago, which proves LC wrong, once again. LC can't take all the revenues from 3rd tier and divide by 10 and hope to come up with his $9million number that would equal the B1G per school pay out.

Pollard has declined to announce how much Cyclones.tv actually rakes in, but it continues to grow especially after its agreement with local cable giant, Mediacom.

Some of the bigger networks are making millions. Kansas’ Jayhawk Network is worth $6 million, Kansas state’s KStateHD.TV is worth $3 million, and the infamous Longhorn Network, which everyone loves to pile on, is worth about $15 million without being on a major provider like DirecTV.


And, unlike Lonely Clown, I can provide a source:

http://clonesconfidential.com/2014/05/30/iowa-state-receives-conference-revenue-every-sec-school/
 
LC answered you on this by explaining that the average big 12 team makes an additional ~$7 million in individual tier 3 rights the $23.3 million figure omits. How can we trust you when you omit this information in your criticism?

B10 teams make similar amounts of money in third tier rights. Go read the long post I just posted in the "Big 12 Expansion" thread.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Franisdaman
The Big Ten's three newest members are on different paths toward receiving full shares: Maryland ($24.1 million), Nebraska ($19.8 million) and Rutgers ($10.5 million).

I have not researched the subject but interested to know what the "different paths" involves. Kind of surprised that newcomer Maryland received substantially more pay-out than Nebraska.

Also, if ESPN really wants to broadcast B10 sports going forward then make those bastards pay through the nose for the rights.

.And ..... I don't really mind Lone Clone posting here, Most of the time he brings useful information IMO. Of course, he sometimes shows his loyalty but nothing close to the other cyclone idiots that venture over here from time to time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tagliboo
I have not researched the subject but interested to know what the "different paths" involves. Kind of surprised that newcomer Maryland received substantially more pay-out than Nebraska.

Also, if ESPN really wants to broadcast B10 sports going forward then make those bastards pay through the nose for the rights.

.And ..... I don't really mind Lone Clone posting here, Most of the time he brings useful information IMO. Of course, he sometimes shows his loyalty but nothing close to the other cyclone idiots that venture over here from time to time.

Yeah,not sure of what the different paths are. But hey, if I were Lonely CLOWN, i would make something up! LOL

MD was in big time trouble financially so maybe that is why they got a higher payout? also, they had to settle with the ACC for leaving. Just speculation on my part; not sure what the agreements were when they signed on to join the B1G (I am sure that document would be an interesting read).
 
I believe Nebraska and Rutgers are on similar 6 year plans.

Maryland is different, because they requested more funds up front due to budget issues. I also think they probably got an overall better deal because they negotiated from a position of strength as a solid member of the ACC. Nebraska and Rutgers were jumping off ships they thought were in trouble.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nu2u
Then reserch big 12 tier 3 rights and report how he is wrong. Ignoring his explanation just makes you as uncredible as you claim he is.

I would love to see what isu is really bringing in on the clown network. We all know that Jaime Pollard may be many things but shy isn't one of them. If isu was bringing in anywhere close to $9M for their 3rd tier then we couldn't ever get away from all of the back slapping Pollard would do for himself.

What is more likely is that isu grad shoots has shot off their mouth again and isn't just wrong but not even close.

I am sure isu grads will be along any minute to tell us how it really is. That is when the real fun begins.

Popcorn please.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Franisdaman
I have not researched the subject but interested to know what the "different paths" involves. Kind of surprised that newcomer Maryland received substantially more pay-out than Nebraska.

When Nebraska joined, the deal the university signed was that the school had to "buy in" to receive full standing with the Big Ten Network since the other league members paid to help get the thing off the ground. Nebraska's first Big Ten payment was roughly equal to the last payment Nebraska received in the Big 12, and the difference from the full payout was paid towards investing in the network. Each year Nebraska's payout has gradually increased and I believe next year Nebraska will be "whole" with the league and will start receiving full payouts, like everyone else.

Rutgers looks like they are on a similar path as Nebraska. Maryland's deal is much more front-loaded as the Terps were in financial trouble. They received much larger conference payouts up front (along with a big loan from the Big Ten) but will have future payouts diminished or a longer buy-in period. When it's all said and done, all three new members of the Big Ten will have all "invested" the same amount of money, albeit in different ways.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ichawk24 and nu2u
In the other thread LC has essentially admitted his numbers are inaccurate.

I am glad everyone is seeing what a joke of a poster he is. He is such a pompous @$$, portraying to be a know it all, throwing out what he calls facts and accurate figures when all that ends up happening is he is proven wrong. He needs to stay strictly on CyCLOWN Fanaitc, but maybe they can't stand him, either.
 
thought the main purpose in bringing in Maryland and Rutgers was all the new TV's that it would bring and to substantially increase revenue. Does anyone know the financial impact that has resulted from those 2 coming in?
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT