ADVERTISEMENT

2025 QB Commit Jimmy Sullivan can Fly

I'm not saying crap until I read Iowacoleslaws unhinged diatribe about him.

200w.gif
 
Trying to remember the last time one of those running QBs played any meaningful minutes.
Not sure about Iowas offensive scheming has evolved at all to benefit from these recruits and their supposed mobility. In fact I’d say the opposite; the offense has evolved not at all and in fact defaults to QBs KF and BF seem comfortable with; Tall statues that supposedly can sit in a pocket and hit TEs over the middle and throw out patterns. Our issue with scheme has been an ability for our OL to form a pocket, our QBs to throw accurate passes in a timely manner, our receivers inability to get space for a decent completion percentage and yardage gain.
 
Recent history doesn't suggest that Kirk shys away from running quarterbacks. We already have Marco Lainez in the program. James Resar coming in looks like a very good athlete. Booty the OU QB under consideration in the portal also looks he can run. Lester has said that it doesn't take a running QB to run his system but he sees mobility as an added bonus
Running QBs recruited? ok
Ability to actually create an offense to utilize said mobility? Nope
 
  • Like
Reactions: dadster
Running QBs recruited? ok
Ability to actually create an offense to utilize said mobility? Nope
None of them has started a game yet, but when one of them did play, he ran for about 50 yards in two series.

I suspect a couple of them will have positive rushing yards in the coming years.

If only Iowa were about to run a completely different offense going forward, we might find out, but alas, just more of Brian Ferentz’ offense. I wish they’d have fired him and hired somebody with a different philosophy.😔
 
Running QBs recruited? ok
Ability to actually create an offense to utilize said mobility? Nope
Why stay stuck in the past? The most mobile quarterbacks in the program Lainez and Resar coming in are both really young. I think things will look really different immediately with the RPO and the new offensive scheme let alone when the more mobile quarterbacks take the helm.
 
None of them has started a game yet, but when one of them did play, he ran for about 50 yards in two series.

I suspect a couple of them will have positive rushing yards in the coming years.

If only Iowa were about to run a completely different offense going forward, we might find out, but alas, just more of Brian Ferentz’ offense. I wish they’d have fired him and hired somebody with a different philosophy.😔
You mean it was all just a beautiful dream? Damn you Birky. Damn you!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Birky
Why stay stuck in the past? The most mobile quarterbacks in the program Lainez and Resar coming in are both really young. I think things will look really different immediately with the RPO and the new offensive scheme let alone when the more mobile quarterbacks take the helm.
To be clear; I was referring to the past regimes. Hoping current regime knows how to utilize the parts and pieces they have.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hawkeyemark18
You really need to start thinking! If you think Kirk wants a vanilla offense you don’t understand the problem! Kirk has had good success on that side of the ball! Much of the failure over the last few years has been execution rather than concept and attrition! If Brody had not chosen baseball and Charlie Jones and Tyrone Tracy had not transferred the offense would have been much better! Hill should have never been QB because he had no mobility and pocket presence! His fumbles and Iowa almost leading the nation in dropped balls were major factors! Then losing your top QB, top two TE’s and top two offensive linemen were all major contributors!
If the offense was better those guys would most likely have stayed. 1 hand feeds the other.
 
I recently watched BTN's replay of the 2000 game at PSU. It was a big win for the Ferentz era - the first road victory. Kyle McCann got the start and was more mobile than I remember. There were several designed QB runs and he moved well in the pocket. He was 25-37 for 252 yards and 1 TD passing, and had 16 carries for 49 yards (that includes sacks). Fans like to dump on McCann (calling him McCan't, etc.), but he was a solid QB that KF inherited from Hayden. It's recency bias to say that KF doesn't like or want mobility at the QB position. It will be nice to see it again on the field.
 
I recently watched BTN's replay of the 2000 game at PSU. It was a big win for the Ferentz era - the first road victory. Kyle McCann got the start and was more mobile than I remember. There were several designed QB runs and he moved well in the pocket. He was 25-37 for 252 yards and 1 TD passing, and had 16 carries for 49 yards (that includes sacks). Fans like to dump on McCann (calling him McCan't, etc.), but he was a solid QB that KF inherited from Hayden. It's recency bias to say that KF doesn't like or want mobility at the QB position. It will be nice to see it again on the field.
Really good against that child rapist's defense.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT