Not always the case. On my wife's side of the family, her grandma inhereted part of a farm. The person taking care of the farm .. just stopped. Also refused to let anyone take care of it. By the time the family finally got him to sell it, it had all been overgrown by volunteer trees. They got maybe 25% of what they could have. I think they sold it at $4,000/acre, when 10 years earlier it was valued around $16,000Farming is like winning the lottery if you inherit the land.
If you totally F it up. Sell the land for $10,000-$15,000 an acre.
resale a couple decades down the road.I’m not a farmer, but that seems like a poor investment given the stated yields, the amount of acres and commodity prices.
$4.30/bushel x 240 bushels/acre x 230 acres = $237k gross revenue for 100% corn
$10.50/bushel x 69 bushels/acre x 230 acres = $166k gross revenue for 100% corn
So $200k GROSS revenue (I have no idea what ops cost would be) is roughly 5% of initial investment. I assume net revenue after ops is likely less than 4%, yuck.
What am I missing here?
I suppose, but seems like it wouldn’t be hard to find superior investments that crush those returns. But as they say, they can’t make more land.resale a couple decades down the road.
it's not going to be farmed but developed I would guess. I've seen very few farms go for that price with intent to farm.I’m not a farmer, but that seems like a poor investment given the stated yields, the amount of acres and commodity prices.
$4.30/bushel x 240 bushels/acre x 230 acres = $237k gross revenue for 100% corn
$10.50/bushel x 69 bushels/acre x 230 acres = $166k gross revenue for 100% beans
So $200k GROSS revenue (I have no idea what ops cost would be) is roughly 5% of initial investment. I assume net revenue after ops is likely less than 4%, yuck.
What am I missing here?
You’re not missing anything. But the land appreciation (when finally realized) probably puts the annual return up to 8-10%.I’m not a farmer, but that seems like a poor investment given the stated yields, the amount of acres and commodity prices.
$4.30/bushel x 240 bushels/acre x 230 acres = $237k gross revenue for 100% corn
$10.50/bushel x 69 bushels/acre x 230 acres = $166k gross revenue for 100% beans
So $200k GROSS revenue (I have no idea what ops cost would be) is roughly 5% of initial investment. I assume net revenue after ops is likely less than 4%, yuck.
What am I missing here?
Development in Grundy County?it's not going to be farmed but developed I would guess. I've seen very few farms go for that price with intent to farm.
Farming is like winning the lottery if you inherit the land.
If you totally F it up. Sell the land for $10,000-$15,000 an acre.
Emotions play such a huge role in this scenario, it’s hard to comprehend. I live in north central North Dakota, corn’s not a major crop but for reference an average corn yield is about 130 bu/acre. A parcel went for about $9000/acre last fall. Two older guys with cash to burn got into a bidding war. There’s about 500 better things they could have done with that money but that’s all they know.I suppose, but seems like it wouldn’t be hard to find superior investments that crush those returns. But as they say, they can’t make more land.
there is devopment everywhere. people perpetually move outside the zone. It's been happening since the beginning of time.Development in Grundy County?
North of Beaman Iowa?there is devopment everywhere. people perpetually move outside the zone. It's been happening since the beginning of time.
I’m a little surprised at historical land appreciation, it’s higher than I would have thought. I wonder how land appreciation compares to net profit trends. Feels like the land is probably overvalued given my assumption of returns, but I’m pretty ignorant when it comes to farming. Maybe this is the historical norm?You’re not missing anything. But the land appreciation (when finally realized) probably puts the annual return up to 8-10%.
It’s can be a good hard asset for someone to have if they have other money in other traditional investment assets like stocks and bonds.
In my opinion, it’s a good asset in large, diversified portfolio, not so much if it’s close to 100% of someone’s net worth.