Yikes! Talk about flushing your credibility down the toilet!
60 Minutes runs scam on viewers
- Thread starter Phenomenally Frantastic
- Start date
There are thousands of actual people who can attest to this so while I don't get why that happened congrats. You truly need to look in the mirror with the BS, gaslighting, lies and disinformation you continue to white knight for a maniac wannabe Dictator whose trying to control everything. You would sign up for immediate service in 1933 Germany. No doubt in my mind. Truly despicable.
The 1st Amendment gives you the right to make these inflammatory and ridiculous claims. Ironic that you support the people doing everything in their power to destroy your right to say these very things.
If Free Speech dies in America, what will happen to humanity? Will we be better off or worse?
60 Minutes has been shady for decades.
Back in the 70's they did a piece on moving companies running loads that were overweight. They did filming at a site outside Atlanta. They had trucks rolling up to the scales and when none of the trucks were overweight, they eventually got producers and other people to stand on the scales on the other side of the truck to inflate the weight.
Back in the 70's they did a piece on moving companies running loads that were overweight. They did filming at a site outside Atlanta. They had trucks rolling up to the scales and when none of the trucks were overweight, they eventually got producers and other people to stand on the scales on the other side of the truck to inflate the weight.
Guy who posted false thread headline that Pride Flags were allowed in OK schools but not US flags has some thoughts on the 1st Amendment?
Eat me. Drink me.
Ps I don’t think Elon is trying to control “everything.” I think he is trying to fix things he views as severely broken. DOGE has a shelf life of July 2026. He will do everything he can to improve everything he can while he can. Then he will get back to focusing on getting humanity to Mars and transition humanity off of fossil fuels. Oh and along the way, many people will have their lives drastically improved thanks to the work Neuralink is doing.
What are you babbling about? Pride flags were allowed per the area Superintendent. He said so right in the article I linked.
They banned the America flag off the student’s truck.
The headline was accurate but missing context. Never understood your gripe. Just picking nits I guess?
I have Come across endless posts and people sharing the sudden loss of their jobs with no notice given with or without this post. The OP is a pathetic ghoul
PF…if you honestly believe this, you are a fool. Musk is in on this for one reason…. Himself. He and Trump are birds of a feather…. 300 years ago both these guys would have been supporters of King George.
Elon sure has a lot of kids for being unable to get an election. Why are you so focused on his Johnson btw?
Oh no, won't somebody think of those government employees running finances on Peruvian LGBT comic strips!?
Maybe they can learn to weld/do something useful.
Trump is doing the same things that Obama and Clinton/Gore ran on in terms of making Government smaller and cutting wasteful spending. Obama even said on video that he doesn’t have to go through Congress to cut wasteful spending. Is it only a Dictatorship when a Republican does it?
x.com
x.com
Who is in charge of the show 60 Minutes?
11 posts
15 web pages
Bill Owens is the executive producer of "60 Minutes" and has been in charge since 2019.
Does he have editorial control?
Yes, as executive producer, Bill Owens has editorial control over "60 Minutes," overseeing content, stories, and overall direction.
So if 60 Minutes were to engage in deliberate deception, it could only occur with his consent?
Yes, as executive producer with editorial control, Bill Owens would likely be aware of and approve major editorial decisions, including any deliberate deception. However, such actions would also involve other key staff and could face legal and ethical consequences.
Explain legal consequences
If "60 Minutes" engaged in deliberate deception, legal consequences could include:
Defamation lawsuits: If false information harms someone's reputation, they could sue for libel or slander.
FCC violations: Broadcasting deceptive content could violate Federal Communications Commission rules, leading to fines or license challenges.
Breach of contract: Advertisers or affiliates might sue if deception violates agreements.
Consumer protection laws: Misleading viewers could trigger legal action under false advertising or fraud statutes.
Criminal charges: In extreme cases, intentional fraud could lead to criminal investigations.
These consequences depend on the nature of the deception, evidence of intent, and applicable laws.
I’m an optimist. We’ll see how it all works out. Many here are ready to call it a failure years in advance, not me.
By t hr time Trump gets finished spinning it will be the greatest accomplishment government ever undertook!
Of course tgeee will fe stuff found…just a lot if the stuff now baking noise will be long forgotten…abd determined to nit fe very important. There will be r considerable damage done to many many folks because of this “investigation”…. Lots of babies will be discarded with the bath water.
Another sharp and focused take on gaslighting.
I suppose these guests of 60 Minutes were like the Texas National Guard documents from the 70s that someone whipped up in Word and passed off to Dan Rather - 'fake, but accurate', amirite?
Guessing this won’t air on 60 Minutes Germany due to their laws on misinformation…
300 years ago most everyone supported the crown, altho I doubt King George was alive. I could be wrong, I didn't look to see when he was born. Maybe William Wallace was starting an uprising, but again, I really don't know that time frame.
60 Minutes used to have a great team of broadcast journalists. Unfortunately, they’re all dead now.
Similar threads
