ADVERTISEMENT

An Iowa farm county seeks answers amid cancer rates 50% higher than national average

cigaretteman

HB King
May 29, 2001
78,477
60,602
113
Raised in rural Iowa, 71-year-old Maureen Reeves Horsley once considered her tiny hometown in the northwest part of the state to be a blessed space. She recalls a time when the streams here ran clean and the lake water was clear.
The family farm where Horsley grew up was one of more than 1,200 farms in Palo Alto County in 1970. In her memory, the county’s 13,000 residents enjoyed a thriving agricultural-based economy and close-knit neighbors. Cows grazed in verdant pastures. And seemingly endless acres of corn marched to the horizon.
“We had good crops, corn and soybeans,” Horsley said of her family’s farm along the West Fork of the Des Moines River. “You could make it on a small amount of farmland. You felt safe. It was a good life.”

Two generations later Emmetsburg and Palo Alto County have been radically transformed into a place where many residents worry that the farms that have sustained their livelihoods are also the source of the health problems that have plagued so many families.


Horsley, a certified nurse practitioner who still lives in the county, is among many Iowa residents who ask whether the farms that make up the lifeblood of Iowa’s economy have become a source of disease and death due to the toxic chemicals and other pollutants indelibly linked to modern agricultural practices.

“We drank the water on our farm,” Horsley said in an interview. “My sister had breast cancer. She was only 27 when she died. She grew up here. My other sister had uterine cancer. As a nurse practitioner I’m aware of five people now with pancreatic cancer. I know 20 people who have other cancers or died of cancer here. Look at the obituaries in our newspaper. Everybody is aware this is going on.”





Chris Green’s husband died of brain cancer in 2019, as have several other people in and around her Iowa town.
Keith Schneider, The New Lede

Cancer concerns mounting

Palo Alto’s 2022 tally of 842 farms generates nearly $800 million in annual market value. But nearly 400 small farms have been absorbed into bigger operations or otherwise stopped operating over recent decades, and Palo Alto’s population has dropped by 4,200 people since 1970.

Today’s Iowa farms are largely focused on raising hogs and growing corn, both of which are linked to numerous environmental problems. Farmers growing corn, for example, often rely heavily on applications of toxic pesticides and fertilizers, while livestock operations generate millions of tons of manure annually. The chemicals and manure pollute food and water consumed by people even far from farm fields.


When nitrogen from fertilizer and manure combine with oxygen they create nitrates, which routinely drain from farm fields into groundwater, streams, and rivers, contaminating water sources. Babies can suffer severe health problems when consuming nitrates in drinking water, and a growing body of literature indicates potential associations that include an increased risk of cancer. Exposure to elevated levels of nitrates in drinking water has been linked by researchers to cancers of the blood, brain, breast, bladder and ovaries.


As well, there are years of research showing that many herbicides and other pesticides applied to farm fields are linked to cancers and other diseases. The National Cancer Institute and the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences have been funding research to investigate the links between disease and farming for more than 30 years, focusing their work on people in Iowa and North Carolina. Among the findings are links between pesticides and malignant brain tumors, multiple myeloma, pancreatic cancer and certain breast cancers.

Concerns about connections between the farm pollutants and cancer have been mounting, particularly in Palo Alto County, which had the highest incidence of cancer of any county in the state and the second-highest incidence of cancer among all US counties, with 83 new cases of cancer on average each year, in a population of 8,996, according to a 2023 report by US News.


The five-year incidence rate for cancer in Palo Alto County is 658.1, far higher than the national five-year average of 442 new cancer cases reported for every 100,000 people, according to the National Cancer Institute.

The concerns are not limited to Palo Alto County: Iowa has the second-highest and fastest-rising cancer incidence among all US states, according to a 2024 report issued by the Iowa Cancer Registry. Cancer incidence in Iowa stayed mostly steady from 2001 to 2010, then dropped briefly before starting an upward climb after 2013, according to federal data.



Medical experts and state health authorities say it is difficult to pinpoint exactly what may be causing the prevalence of cancer in Palo Alto and Iowa overall. But many residents believe there is little doubt that the answers lie in the tide of farm pollutants pervading the environment.
“We are so heavily into agriculture in Iowa,” said Horsley said. “Big chemical use. Big nutrient applications. What effect is that having on people? There needs to be more research on that.”


 

'So much pain'

David Dunn and his wife, Sharon Kendall-Dunn, reside in Davenport, some 300 miles south and east of Palo Alto County. Still, they wrestle with their own concerns about the impacts farming and farm-related pollution may have on their health. Ten years ago the couple learned that a mass in David’s abdomen was non-Hodgkin lymphoma, a cancer common in farm country nationally.

Though the couple did not work or live on a farm, their doctor indicated the environment could be to blame. Sharon remembers that when she asked the doctor how her husband could have gotten the disease, he told the couple simply: “You live in Iowa.”

Two years ago Sharon was also diagnosed with cancer, a type called chronic myeloid leukemia, which begins in the bone marrow. So far, treatment has helped keep her disease under control.
“I was in so much pain,” she said. “It’s better now.”

David’s cancer is also undergoing treatment. But the impact on his life and his future has been dramatic.
“This is some kind of crazy,” said David. “I stopped dreaming. I stopped dreaming about retirement. I stopped dreaming about the kids graduating from college. I didn’t think I’d see them get married. I didn’t think I was going to hold a grandkid.”
Both Sharon and David grew up in Iowa. Other friends and family members have also been diagnosed with cancers, and some have died.
In the tiny farming town of Long Grove, Chris Green mourns the 2019 death of her husband, who was stricken by the deadly brain cancer known as glioblastoma. With aggressive treatment, Jim Green lived nearly two years following his diagnosis but ultimately succumbed.

“He said to me, ‘You know, I can’t do this anymore.’” Chris recalled. “So we had hospice come in. Jim passed in the living room… surrounded by family.”
Before he died at age 65, Jim worked nearly 39 years on the maintenance staff of an aluminum plate rolling mill in Davenport. His exposures to various industrial chemicals there could have been a factor in his disease, but some studies also link pesticides, such as those used commonly on farms, to glioblastoma.
Chris said she knows of at least nine other people in her community who have died from glioblastoma in the last several years.
“What you’re seeing in Iowa is a problem,” said Molly Jacobs, an epidemiologist at the University of Massachusetts. “You can see it from the experience on the ground. The message from me is to put energy into reducing exposure to the known harms.”




Linus Solberg, a farmer and a Palo Alto County supervisor, has asked health authorities for assistance in understanding the sources of cancer in his community.
Keith Schneider, The New Lede

'We need to find out what’s going on'​

The pesticides used on Iowa farmland are seen as a likely culprit for at least some of the cases, experts said.
“We have a very high percentage of our land that is growing crops,” said Dr. Richard Deming, an oncologist in Des Moines. “The current way of growing crops is to use a lot of ag chemicals, which have improved the yield of crops. Is there, potentially, a downside? That’s where we really need to do more research. There is certainly circumstantial evidence that we’re probably exposed to more ag chemicals just because of the nature of Iowa, and the number of acres of Iowa that are under agricultural production.”
Living in a place with cancer rates nearly 50% higher than the national average prompted Linus Solberg, a farmer and Palo Alto County supervisor, to ask area health authorities for assistance in understanding the sources for disease and reducing risks. He said he knows state universities have studied the problem, but sees little being done to address the risks.
Solberg’s father developed prostate cancer, and his mother died at age 69 of ovarian cancer, while his wife and three neighbors on his road also died of cancer.
“So that’s six right there on two miles along this road,” he said. “I don’t know if its pesticide, or electrical. We have all these windmills. I don’t know if it’s in the water. I have no idea.”
The county’s health authorities say they are expanding screening programs for breast, lung, prostate, and colon cancer, counseling residents on smoking and diet, and testing homes for radon, a naturally occurring radioactive gas and a proven carcinogen.
“Organizationally, we’ve concentrated on early detection, and health and wellness,” said Jonathan Moe, chief executive officer of the Palo Alto County Health System.
The county also tests residential drinking water wells for contaminants under a state-funded program.
Ben Huntley, the environmental health specialist who manages the program, sampled 121 homes over the past 24 months. According to his records, three samples were above the 10 parts per million federal drinking water limits for nitrates.
The much larger hazards were E.coli bacteria – 30 samples above safety limits – and arsenic, a naturally occurring mineral and a carcinogen linked to lung, bladder, and kidney cancer – that exceeded the safety standard in 45 wells.
Settled by Irish immigrants in the mid-19th century, Palo Alto County has endured bad crop years, the deep drought of the early 20th century, and the 1980s farm crisis. Now cancer is laying claim as an Iowa calamity.
“In the old days, the farmers lived longer lives if they didn’t die from an accident on the farm,” Horsley said. “Now everybody is getting checkups and finding out they have prostate cancer, or they’ve got glioblastoma, or they’ve got cancer in the lymph nodes. We need to find out what’s going on.”
 
  • Like
Reactions: Slappy Pappy
Improper treatment of animal waste and insecticide and herbicide use can have its dangers…all that crap works its way into the groundwater system and from there, into other living things. We all knew cigarettes were killers before any action was ever taken of them…and there is more $$ at stake in the meat and crop industries. Cancer doesn’t care, either.

A couple of weeks ago, it was reported that nitrates were running twice the normal rate in the groundwater serving the greater DSM area… higher river levels, fertilizer run-offs were the suspected main culprits. Cricketts…DSM has the machinery to removed enough of these nitrates to make it potable water….it just adds lots of $$ to the water bill.
 
Red area. Check the death rates against voter registration.

If there's a correlation, it's destiny.
 
I wonder how many rural people have invested in water purification systems? Well water is gross without being purified, but I suppose if it’s all someone has ever known, it may seem fine. Regardless, while not being cheap, a softening and filtration system removes almost all of the nitrates that cause so much concern. I installed one in my house because I didn’t like the way the city water tasted. It makes a world of difference.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Stoopsbrother
The writing of this story is somewhat murky IMO. It leads off with the idea that it is going to be about farm land cancer rates...only examples #2 and #3 are all about people who aren't farmers, or even apparently rural residents. Rising cancer rates are serious and I would be interested in knowing more facts about them, but overly generalized, and potentially even slightly misleading, write ups like this don't help much IMO.
 
The writing of this story is somewhat murky IMO. It leads off with the idea that it is going to be about farm land cancer rates...only examples #2 and #3 are all about people who aren't farmers, or even apparently rural residents. Rising cancer rates are serious and I would be interested in knowing more facts about them, but overly generalized, and potentially even slightly misleading, write ups like this don't help much IMO.
Last year several oak trees on my street suffered from Dicamba drift. One of the MILFs at the gym was talking a few weeks ago about laying out in the sun at her house in rural Cedar County and a crop duster hitting the field next to their house, and she was wondering if she should have gone inside? We drink Iowa water and breath Iowa air. It’s all around us and in us
 
I wonder how many rural people have invested in water purification systems? Well water is gross without being purified, but I suppose if it’s all someone has ever known, it may seem fine. Regardless, while not being cheap, a softening and filtration system removes almost all of the nitrates that cause so much concern. I installed one in my house because I didn’t like the way the city water tasted. It makes a world of difference.
So you only like purified water is see. I actually think purified water tastes like poop.
I have well water and it’s great. Much better than the crap in Iowa city.
 
No "Iowa is the worst state in the country" thread is complete without this guy chiming in.
Thnx.

I like to add constructive criticism when warranted.

Mississippi North has become a shithole State under Republican rule because environmental issues are ignored and the DNR has become understaffed to prevent enforcing the existing laws.
 
Last year several oak trees on my street suffered from Dicamba drift. One of the MILFs at the gym was talking a few weeks ago about laying out in the sun trying to get skin cancer at her house in rural Cedar County and a crop duster hitting the field next to their house, and she was wondering if she should have gone inside? We drink Iowa water and breath Iowa air. It’s all around us and in us
 
If the feds banned most chemicals commodity prices would go through the roof.

Of course they would need to be banned at the federal level otherwise a single state would be killing their farm economy.
 
Last year several oak trees on my street suffered from Dicamba drift. One of the MILFs at the gym was talking a few weeks ago about laying out in the sun at her house in rural Cedar County and a crop duster hitting the field next to their house, and she was wondering if she should have gone inside? We drink Iowa water and breath Iowa air. It’s all around us and in us
I don't deny this, but the article starts off with a "farm county" angle...which it then does not really stay on that point. I just think that the writer could be much more clear as to his/her main point.

I too wonder about these things and would like to know more about them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: globalhawk
I am now in my 60’s. Every classmate from my home town that went into farming died of cancer or a farm accident. Big money but a very dangerous occupation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: stickman80
I wonder how many rural people have invested in water purification systems? Well water is gross without being purified, but I suppose if it’s all someone has ever known, it may seem fine. Regardless, while not being cheap, a softening and filtration system removes almost all of the nitrates that cause so much concern. I installed one in my house because I didn’t like the way the city water tasted. It makes a world of difference.
Do you ever wonder about why you have to invest in a purification system? Not only is it a cost imposed on you by others, but it just sucks. Our well water is fine purification.
 
Do you ever wonder about why you have to invest in a purification system? Not only is it a cost imposed on you by others, but it just sucks. Our well water is fine purification.

I didn't have to buy it. The city water in Cedar Rapids is perfectly fine. I just wanted something better.
 
The people who live in these rural communities are voting for the very folks that are dismantling environmental protections designed to catch heightened levels of known carcinogens in the drinking water.

Never underestimate humanity’s ability to work against its own self interest.
Bullshit.
Remind me what president pushed and signed the epa founding.
 
Bullshit.
Remind me what president pushed and signed the epa founding.
Oh, so your contention is because a Republican signed a piece of legislation 54 years ago, this is some kind of gotcha?

Ray Liotta Lol GIF
 
My comment was specifically focused on what the Iowa Governor and her cronies have been up to over the past several years. The era of conservatives focused on…conservation is unfortunately as dead as Nixon.
I’m not in iowa anymore. Can you summarize changes shes made.
 
I’m not in iowa anymore. Can you summarize changes shes made.
I’m not there either anymore, but I have elderly family I worry about with the rural water situation.

In a nutshell, the state slashed funding for water quality sensors, which obviously hampers the ability to measure pollution. They also have removed requirements for individual certification of projects near open waterways. Of course this year one such project had a massive spill killing massive numbers of fish. They have gutted environmental protections in favor of big ag. The irony is this is not helping the family farmer, just the giant corporations.

Here are a couple links:

From the DM Register
From the Capitol Dispatch
 
I’m not there either anymore, but I have elderly family I worry about with the rural water situation.

In a nutshell, the state slashed funding for water quality sensors, which obviously hampers the ability to measure pollution. They also have removed requirements for individual certification of projects near open waterways. Of course this year one such project had a massive spill killing massive numbers of fish. They have gutted environmental protections in favor of big ag. The irony is this is not helping the family farmer, just the giant corporations.

Here are a couple links:

From the DM Register
From the Capitol Dispatch
Yeah
Spills never happened before. Kims fault.
I just read crap like what chevron is going thru in CA and see liberal agendas off the rails.
 
Yeah
Spills never happened before. Kims fault.
I just read crap like what chevron is going thru in CA and see liberal agendas off the rails.
I’m not sure why you would want to play team politics on this particular issue if you care about the environment. You argued that Republicans put in place the original environmental protection so deserve some credit . . . that is not in dispute. Hell environmental conservation used to be a substantial policy plank of the GOP. Of course that was 50+ years ago.

My point is this has changed. The Iowa GOP have removed protections. This is NOT in question. In fact they have celebrated this. Combine that with big ag’s lack of care over the environment and you get the issues Iowa has now. None of this is debatable. It’s all plain fact.
 
Yeah
Spills never happened before. Kims fault.
I just read crap like what chevron is going thru in CA and see liberal agendas off the rails.
Why do so many Iowans seem to be willing to trade lifespans for dollars?
The current ag focus is not only killing your generation, but others down the road.
Is it worth that to you?
Do you not desire a different path toward prosperity?
 
Yep.
Not against clean water and air.
I’m old enough to remember the destruction ddt did and it’s obvious other chemicals including roundup are still causing problems.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hawkeyetraveler
Raised in rural Iowa, 71-year-old Maureen Reeves Horsley once considered her tiny hometown in the northwest part of the state to be a blessed space. She recalls a time when the streams here ran clean and the lake water was clear.
The family farm where Horsley grew up was one of more than 1,200 farms in Palo Alto County in 1970. In her memory, the county’s 13,000 residents enjoyed a thriving agricultural-based economy and close-knit neighbors. Cows grazed in verdant pastures. And seemingly endless acres of corn marched to the horizon.
“We had good crops, corn and soybeans,” Horsley said of her family’s farm along the West Fork of the Des Moines River. “You could make it on a small amount of farmland. You felt safe. It was a good life.”

Two generations later Emmetsburg and Palo Alto County have been radically transformed into a place where many residents worry that the farms that have sustained their livelihoods are also the source of the health problems that have plagued so many families.


Horsley, a certified nurse practitioner who still lives in the county, is among many Iowa residents who ask whether the farms that make up the lifeblood of Iowa’s economy have become a source of disease and death due to the toxic chemicals and other pollutants indelibly linked to modern agricultural practices.

“We drank the water on our farm,” Horsley said in an interview. “My sister had breast cancer. She was only 27 when she died. She grew up here. My other sister had uterine cancer. As a nurse practitioner I’m aware of five people now with pancreatic cancer. I know 20 people who have other cancers or died of cancer here. Look at the obituaries in our newspaper. Everybody is aware this is going on.”





Chris Green’s husband died of brain cancer in 2019, as have several other people in and around her Iowa town.
Keith Schneider, The New Lede

Cancer concerns mounting

Palo Alto’s 2022 tally of 842 farms generates nearly $800 million in annual market value. But nearly 400 small farms have been absorbed into bigger operations or otherwise stopped operating over recent decades, and Palo Alto’s population has dropped by 4,200 people since 1970.

Today’s Iowa farms are largely focused on raising hogs and growing corn, both of which are linked to numerous environmental problems. Farmers growing corn, for example, often rely heavily on applications of toxic pesticides and fertilizers, while livestock operations generate millions of tons of manure annually. The chemicals and manure pollute food and water consumed by people even far from farm fields.


When nitrogen from fertilizer and manure combine with oxygen they create nitrates, which routinely drain from farm fields into groundwater, streams, and rivers, contaminating water sources. Babies can suffer severe health problems when consuming nitrates in drinking water, and a growing body of literature indicates potential associations that include an increased risk of cancer. Exposure to elevated levels of nitrates in drinking water has been linked by researchers to cancers of the blood, brain, breast, bladder and ovaries.


As well, there are years of research showing that many herbicides and other pesticides applied to farm fields are linked to cancers and other diseases. The National Cancer Institute and the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences have been funding research to investigate the links between disease and farming for more than 30 years, focusing their work on people in Iowa and North Carolina. Among the findings are links between pesticides and malignant brain tumors, multiple myeloma, pancreatic cancer and certain breast cancers.

Concerns about connections between the farm pollutants and cancer have been mounting, particularly in Palo Alto County, which had the highest incidence of cancer of any county in the state and the second-highest incidence of cancer among all US counties, with 83 new cases of cancer on average each year, in a population of 8,996, according to a 2023 report by US News.


The five-year incidence rate for cancer in Palo Alto County is 658.1, far higher than the national five-year average of 442 new cancer cases reported for every 100,000 people, according to the National Cancer Institute.

The concerns are not limited to Palo Alto County: Iowa has the second-highest and fastest-rising cancer incidence among all US states, according to a 2024 report issued by the Iowa Cancer Registry. Cancer incidence in Iowa stayed mostly steady from 2001 to 2010, then dropped briefly before starting an upward climb after 2013, according to federal data.



Medical experts and state health authorities say it is difficult to pinpoint exactly what may be causing the prevalence of cancer in Palo Alto and Iowa overall. But many residents believe there is little doubt that the answers lie in the tide of farm pollutants pervading the environment.
“We are so heavily into agriculture in Iowa,” said Horsley said. “Big chemical use. Big nutrient applications. What effect is that having on people? There needs to be more research on that.”


Just when we thought you Iowans had a higher than average IQ and were nicer when traveling by plane.
 
Yep.
Not against clean water and air.
I’m old enough to remember the destruction ddt did and it’s obvious other chemicals including roundup are still causing problems.
I think the new generation of chemicals are just getting started causing generational problems.
Believe me when I say that Iowa is not alone in facing big issues now and down the road.
I grew up in and left Florida at 21. The Everglades were already shrinking and devastated, with Big Sugar and drainage canals leading the way. North Florida forests and family farms were converted to yellow pine plantations. The orange groves and cattle ranches of Central Florida were now planting houses for Yankees.
When I hit North Carolina at 21, the seams were beginning to bust. Hawg farms down East were already overrun with overflowing waste lagoons. Second and third home buyers were contributing to erosion and habitat losses in our fragile high elevation habitats.
Now, the temperature rise aids aggressive vines and grasses sold and promoted by the Ag Extension agents and moreso the landscape folks as they relentlessly take over native habitat. Fuggin Brazilian pampas grasses, honeysuckle, kudzu, and multiflora rose continue to shade out native flora.
The fragile and world class high elevation habitats are on the wane.
Meanwhile bazillionsires build stoopid houses in our region and destroy working class property values.
 
Last edited:
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT