ADVERTISEMENT

Are You For or Against Banning TikTok?

i have no problems if the control panels are in american hands
i would be somewhat ok even if it's in chinese hands if our apps were operating in china
barring above, dump it. there are other options
 
  • Like
Reactions: NDallasRuss
I'd prefer that another social media company not be bought by billionaires to be used to brainwash the masses like the last one.
Besides which, they'll just sell the data. To the highest bidders - including China, Russia, the US, and anyone else who's willing to pony up. Capitalism, capitalism über alles.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Moral and Ree4
I don't think the US government should use economic pressures on China to allow a US company to buy the damn thing and use it for their own advantage(scraping data on users to better target ads).

If you don't want it, don't use it.

But if Congress and the next POTUS do this I look forward to the tech wars to come, but have little faith they will be good for my life.
 
Tik Tok is a stupid waste of time.

I'm usually on it before I go to bed and can kill an hour in no time. I'm not I'm favor of banning too many things. So set let the people decide.
 
Don’t use it so I don’t care that much.
But I have to think TikTok and other similar social media is ruining this country and allowing major idiots to become popular and people want to idol that complete idiot.
Thus TikTok can’t be doing anything good for America.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NDallasRuss
America has laws barring our own government from gathering certain kinds of information on its own citizens.

When we bother to give more than lip service to those prohibitions, but we want those data, we just buy them from the corporations we allow to surveil us, or from our allies. Credit agencies, insurance companies, ISPs, social media platforms, and so many more.

One nation, under surveillance....
 
  • Like
Reactions: WSC72
Everyone is using and selling our data.

What is Bytedance doing that's different??
summary is "Chinese law requires ByteDance to comply with Beijing’s surveillance demands. This is why there’s no way to mitigate TikTok’s security risks besides a forced divestment. "

 
  • Like
Reactions: NDallasRuss
there are a couple puzzling things on the politics of tiktok. until a month ago trump and his camp were totally anti tiktok operating under chinese ownership. soon after elections, bam they've reversed course and seem sympathetic. otoh, until the election was lost biden and the dems seemed sympathetic to bytedance but after losing the election bam they've reversed course and would like to nail them. what's going on? almost like post election the lobby money switched from dems to reps...of course i am totally guessing
 
I actually liken this to the Nippon/US Steel situation. There are some commodities that are sensitive and part of US’s vital interests and we have laws in place to help secure private industry for what the nation needs.

Being foreign owned, the laws are pretty clear on what the US can do. However, more speech is good for free speech.

That being said, the best compromise has already been proposed. ByteDance sells TikTok to a US owned and known friendly custodian all contingent upon providing full source-code (in escrow, subject to DoJ review).
 
  • Like
Reactions: desihawk
Against the ban. Tik-tok for me at least has been an entertaining trek into social media. I cannot stand Twitter/X...it used to be highly entertaining and funny....now its not fun...I don't like Facebook/Instagram....for the same reason.

I guess I could venture over to youtube it tik-tok goes away.
 
I don't use it, so I have no opinion based on the nature of the platform.

And honestly, I'm not sure that I entirely understand the legislation in question that well (other than the net of, the chinese have to divest or it can't operate in the us). My "gut" from scanning the briefs was that both sides were talking past each other a bit, and maybe playing a little fast and loose, but, my 'gut' was that this seemed like a first amendment problem that shouldn't meet the strict scrutiny standard.

But i've got the oral argument on in the background right now, and so far, the justices (of all stripes) seem to be giving Tiktok a pretty hard time. Curious to see how General Prelogar's argument goes.
 
I am against the ban. I guess we will have to see what Israel decides.
 
we have federal laws/mandates for kids all over the place for safety.

Sure do. But that's not the reasons being given for this potential ban.

I could see how that could be an underlying motivator for some in government, but I don't see how it would be Constitutional(which may be why it's not the preffered talking point).
 
Personally, U wouldn’t trust Tik-Tok any further than I can throw them. I think they are a net negative for America and its intended way of life. But, I think most other “social platforms” are atleast neutral and probably a bet negative.
 
  • Like
Reactions: desihawk
I am for banning social media for people under 16. It’s absolute garbage and does more harm than good.

Shoot, look at this fuggin place. Filled with a bunch of dipshit adults I can’t imagine what a high school would be like
 
  • Like
Reactions: desihawk
But none for social media.

Why just attack on Tik Tok?
hypothetical question unrelated to tik tok but associated with online stuff.

Assume gambling is addictive. Assume gambling platforms are pretty good at identifying "high users", who might be correlated with persons with addiction. Assume their marketing hooks reach, or even focus somewhat on, those people. And assume there are disclaimers, references to addiction hotlines, etc.

Do you think platforms should be legally exposed vis a vis claims by addicts?
 
hypothetical question unrelated to tik tok but associated with online stuff.

Assume gambling is addictive. Assume gambling platforms are pretty good at identifying "high users", who might be correlated with persons with addiction. Assume their marketing hooks reach, or even focus somewhat on, those people. And assume there are disclaimers, references to addiction hotlines, etc.

Do you think platforms should be legally exposed vis a vis claims by addicts?

Hell no.
 
hypothetical question unrelated to tik tok but associated with online stuff.

Assume gambling is addictive. Assume gambling platforms are pretty good at identifying "high users", who might be correlated with persons with addiction. Assume their marketing hooks reach, or even focus somewhat on, those people. And assume there are disclaimers, references to addiction hotlines, etc.

Do you think platforms should be legally exposed vis a vis claims by addicts?
Do you think this is not the case right now? It is all about the $$ and has nothing to do with ethics/morality. Everything in America is transactional or moving that way. Everyone knows they are going to become millionaires if the government just wouldn’t tax them so much…or try to regulate their behavior!?
 
fvck Tik Tok
Just another POS social media site adding to teenage depression and anxiety and leading people around like sheep.
People now days are fvcking morons.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: TylerJ23
Do you think this is not the case right now? It is all about the $$ and has nothing to do with ethics/morality. Everything in America is transactional or moving that way. Everyone knows they are going to become millionaires if the government just wouldn’t tax them so much…or try to regulate their behavior!?
No, I don't think we're there now. But recently, as part of looking at McKinsey's settlement in the opioid matter, I began to mull the parallels. In the longer term, it would not surprise me at all to see a similar type of "crisis" in the future.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT