I'd prefer that another social media company not be bought by billionaires to be used to brainwash the masses like the last two.
FIFY
I'd prefer that another social media company not be bought by billionaires to be used to brainwash the masses like the last two.
That's very good issue on it's own, but it's a different issue and hardly unique to TikTok.dig a little deeper and see why it is damaging to a developing brain.
Twitter and ...? I'm sure you're right but I'm blanking on the other.FIFY
Ban only fans
Tik tok, Twitch/streaming, insta and onlyfans has ruined this whole new generation of young people.And ruin googling "random Onlyfans name leak?" You monster.
Interesting article, albeit out of date. To the extent that those considerations are still front and center, it's not clear that TikTok is worse than home grown surveillers (surveillents?) like X and Facebook, and Google and....summary is "Chinese law requires ByteDance to comply with Beijing’s surveillance demands. This is why there’s no way to mitigate TikTok’s security risks besides a forced divestment. "
WSJ Editorial Board: Tackling the TikTok Threat
The Committee on Energy and Commerce is the oldest standing legislative committee in the U.S. House of Representatives and is vested with the broadest jurisdiction of any congressional authorizing committee.energycommerce.house.gov
Twitter and ...? I'm sure you're right but I'm blanking on the other.
I'm not sure why they are talking about banning it.
With that said, the world would be a better place without it.
Facebook was already billionaire-owned.Facebook helped radicalize a lot of Boomers and Pre-Boomers in the middle of the last decade
i disagree with the first bolded part. there is quite a bit of difference between surveiling by x/facebook/google and permitting surveilance by the chinese.Interesting article, albeit out of date. To the extent that those considerations are still front and center, it's not clear that TikTok is worse than home grown surveillers (surveillents?) like X and Facebook, and Google and....
Bad actors are bad actors. Being a US bad actor doesn't make that OK.
If we are going to have rules, let's have rules that aim at the actual problems.
Moreover, if we are going to complain about the evil Chinese doing bad things, can we please make sure that we don't do the same bad things?
For example? What do you think they are doing with data about you or me that's worse than what our greedy corporations or our corrupt governments do?there is quite a bit of difference between surveiling by x/facebook/google and permitting surveilance by the chinese.
for example retain the power to incite or inflame a protest in a way that weakens cohesion or increases fissures here. it's not just about monitoring shopping preferences and you well know itFor example? What do you think they are doing with data about you or me that's worse than what our greedy corporations or our corrupt governments do?
We aren't talking about state secrets here or theft of intellectual property. We're talking about your habits and my shopping preferences. China is probably a lower risk to us than our domestic powers.
I’m for barring all social media. A help for some. A destructive force to the majority.Barring intervention from SCOTUS, we are on the verge of either banning TikTok or requiring its sale to a friendly company.
Do you favor this? Why?
That's a different issue and I started to raise it in my previous post but decided not to muddy the waters.for example retain the power to incite or inflame a protest in a way that weakens cohesion or increases fissures here. it's not just about monitoring shopping preferences and you well know it
I'm against.Barring intervention from SCOTUS, we are on the verge of either banning TikTok or requiring its sale to a friendly company.
Do you favor this? Why?