ADVERTISEMENT

Attention Kamala - Ex-MLB star rips San Francisco after NFL player shot in attempted robbery: 'Absolute hell hole'

Yes, if gun violence is really the scourge on American society so many claim it to be, criminals caught with illegal guns should either get no bail or extraordinarily high bail to help keep them off the streets. Either we're serious about him violence or we aren't. This case is a perfect example that's repeated in big cities across the country constantly.
No. Not high bail. If they are that dangerous keep them off the streets with no bail. If a billionaire is dangerous they should not get bail just because they are a billionaire. A pauper should not have to stay in jail just because they are a pauper.

The amount of money you have should not be the deciding factor for you staying in jail pending trial. Your risk to the community and history of not showing for court should decide that.
 
Former MLB star Mark Mulder ripped the city of San Francisco on Saturday after 49ers rookie wide receiver Ricky Pearsall was wounded in a shooting during a robbery attempt.

The shooting occurred in the Union Square area of the city. Pearsall was reportedly shot by a 17-year-old who tried stealing his Rolex. Pearsall was shot in the chest, but the bullet exited his body without hitting any vital organs, according to his mother, Erin.

"What an absolute hell hole of a city!" he wrote on X. "The mentally ill Libs will still tell you how beautiful it is all while they get mugged and step in s---."

Mulder played nine years in the majors between the Oakland Athletics and the St. Louis Cardinals. He was an All-Star in 2003 and 2004 and finished runner-up for the American League Cy Young Award in 2001.

He’s been far from the athletes who have criticized the city over the last 12 months.


Charles Barkley blasted the city during the NBA All-Star Game.

Former San Francisco Giants star Buster Posey also suggested that crime and drugs were a turnoff to impending free agents.

Pearsall was released from the hospital on Sunday. The 23-year-old had been walking alone shortly after 3:30 p.m. local time when a suspect tried to rob him with a gun in the Union Square area, according to officials. San Francisco Police Chief Bill Scott said that more than one shot was fired.

"A struggle between Mr. Pearsall and the suspect ensued, and gunfire from the suspect’s gun struck both Mr. Pearsall and the subject."

The gun allegedly belonged to the suspect and was recovered. Scott said investigators believe the teen acted alone, adding that there was no indication that Pearsall had been targeted because he’s a football player.

San Francisco Mayor London Breed said at a news conference later Saturday. "This was a terrible and rare incident in Union Square, and our thoughts are with Ricky Pearsall and his family. He has a bright future, and I look forward to seeing him recover and get back on the field."

Pearsall was drafted by the 49ers in the first round in April. He missed time during training camp with a few nagging injuries.

This Mark Mulder.


Great source of information. His hero is Goebbels.
 
Why don't we just take all the guns then? Go into homes and take them.

Since its clear you hate the constitution, why don't we just do rid of the 2nd? Either we are serious about him violence or we aren't
Unlike you I realize the gun problem doesn't lie in the homes of law abiding citizens. The problem is pieces of garbage like this kid who has shown he'll go so far as to attenpt kill someone with an illegal gun of need be. And we have cities and states making it easier and easier for him to be on the streets doing so. Cashless bail isn't in the constitution nor is it the only issue here. Charges are constantly dropped or plead down as well.
 
Just getting your opinion on this, if a soldier knows his unit is deploying and does not reenlist to make that deployment is he a coward? How is that different from what Walt did?
Apples and Oranges btw what does your post have to do with San Fran being a violent Harris created shit hole?
 
Last edited:
No. Not high bail. If they are that dangerous keep them off the streets with no bail. If a billionaire is dangerous they should not get bail just because they are a billionaire. A pauper should not have to stay in jail just because they are a pauper.

The amount of money you have should not be the deciding factor for you staying in jail pending trial. Your risk to the community and history of not showing for court should decide that.
I don't disagree, especially on your previous point of violent crimes and the likelihood of ricidivism should be a factor. With gang driven gun violence being as bad as it is those should all be automatic no bail cases imo.
 
Apples and Oranges btw what does your post have to do with San Fran being a violent Harris created shit hole?
You’re the one who made a post call the next VP a coward. I was interested in your standards on this. Especially wondered if dodging the draft makes you a coward, I.e. Clinton and Trump
 
I don't disagree, especially on your previous point of violent crimes and the likelihood of ricidivism should be a factor. With gang driven gun violence being as bad as it is those should all be automatic no bail cases imo.
If someone uses a gun in the commission of a crime that should be no bail. If someone has simply possessed a gun in the commission of a crime then no. Example. Rob a store while pointing a gun gets you no bail. Having a gun on your hip while buying crack makes you eligible for bail.
 
If someone uses a gun in the commission of a crime that should be no bail. If someone has simply possessed a gun in the commission of a crime then no. Example. Rob a store while pointing a gun gets you no bail. Having a gun on your hip while buying crack makes you eligible for bail.
Disagree there. Simply having the gun during the illegal act, and it being an illegally owned gun is enough imo. Those "I just bright the gun with me in case the crack deal.goes bad" very often do and end up in shootings.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LetsGoHawks83
I was in San Francisco two weeks ago. Saw a great show.

Because it's only an hour and a half from where I live, I go there fairly often. They've cleaned it up A LOT in the past couple of years. I've noticed the installation of more public restrooms, and an overall feeling of greater cleanliness in my recent visits.

All you hillbilly haters can keep on hating for all I care. Stay away. You wouldn't fit in anyhow.
 
Disagree there. Simply having the gun during the illegal act, and it being an illegally owned gun is enough imo. Those "I just bright the gun with me in case the crack deal.goes bad" very often do and end up in shootings.
You can’t lock everyone up pretrial without bail. Your scenario might be valid if you add a history of violence.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DeangeloVickers
I was in San Francisco two weeks ago. Saw a great show.

Because it's only an hour and a half from where I live, I go there fairly often. They've cleaned it up A LOT in the past couple of years. I've noticed the installation of more public restrooms, and an overall feeling of greater cleanliness in my recent visits.

All you hillbilly haters can keep on hating for all I care. Stay away. You wouldn't fit in anyhow.
I lived there in the 80’s. There was crime but nothing like now. Visit friends often. Downtown is a shithole. Good luck riding the MUNI. You have no perspective. Our best friends, SF natives, spend most of their time out of the city. Beautiful place. Sad what it become.
 
Unlike you I realize the gun problem doesn't lie in the homes of law abiding citizens. The problem is pieces of garbage like this kid who has shown he'll go so far as to attenpt kill someone with an illegal gun of need be. And we have cities and states making it easier and easier for him to be on the streets doing so. Cashless bail isn't in the constitution nor is it the only issue here. Charges are constantly dropped or plead down as well.

ah got it so we'll be selective in which part of the contsution we'll ignore so it fits your argument. We'll just gloss overthe excessive bail and cruel and unusual punishment or due process or a host of others. So long as Deangelo gets to keeep his gun.


There has been one thing proven with gun control. It's been shown the most effective way to reduce gun violence is by reducing guns. Not making laws tougher, not singling out individuals, by removal of guns.
 
Disagree there. Simply having the gun during the illegal act, and it being an illegally owned gun is enough imo. Those "I just bright the gun with me in case the crack deal.goes bad" very often do and end up in shootings.

yeah cause police never get things wrong....
 
I lived there in the 80’s. There was crime but nothing like now. Visit friends often. Downtown is a shithole. Good luck riding the MUNI. You have no perspective. Our best friends, SF natives, spend most of their time out of the city. Beautiful place. Sad what it become.
Cool story, bro.
 
ah got it so we'll be selective in which part of the contsution we'll ignore so it fits your argument. We'll just gloss overthe excessive bail and cruel and unusual punishment or due process or a host of others. So long as Deangelo gets to keeep his gun.


There has been one thing proven with gun control. It's been shown the most effective way to reduce gun violence is by reducing guns. Not making laws tougher, not singling out individuals, by removal of guns.
As has been mentioned, bail is denied in cases all the time when a defendant is a danger or flight risk. You aren't "removing guns" from America, its a childish ridiculous suggestion. The adult solution is to focus on the individuals committing crimes with them and take real action to prevent and punish them.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT