ADVERTISEMENT

Best Hawk Ever?

I don't go back before Ronnie Lester, so I can't evaluate great players before then, like Freddie Brown and John Johnson, who were on the other Final Four team. I believe Keegan Murray's final season (on both ends of the court) was the best single season I have seen in a Hawkeye uni. Does that make him the best ever? Ronnie Lester is a big reason I became a Hawkeye fan, and I think he had the best career in a Hawkeye uni. The knee injury robbed him and fans of a very possible outright Big Ten and National Championship. Ronnie's best attribute was his leadership and how he made everyone else on the court a much better player. Like Keegan, he was great on both ends. I have to give a mention to Luka, who was outstanding on offense, and worked very hard to make himself a pretty good defender by his senior year. His work ethic was his strength.

This past season is the first I have watched much women's BB. If you include both men and women's BB, I might give the nod to Caitlin Clark, who still has more time to show what she can do.
John Johnson and Freddy Brown never got to play in the Final four due to a last second tip-in by Pembrook Burroughs III which gave Jacksonville the win.
 
John Johnson and Freddy Brown never got to play in the Final four due to a last second tip-in by Pembrook Burroughs III which gave Jacksonville the win.
Thanks for the correction. You're right. Before my time watching Iowa BB, although I do vaguely remember seeing at least part of the Jacksonville game, and was thinking that was a final four game. I did see both JJ and Freddy play in the NBA live and on TV. I think I was mixing them up with the Fab Five of the 50s, which was before TVs and when I was a baby.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bishop1971
I absolutely love Clark. My daughter is named Gabriella after my wifes grandmother. We call her Gabbby. Love the women's team and look forward to next season. Do you have a kid cause you are posting pretty late like me. Gabby is quite a handful and a little sick so no sleep for me. At least not much.
I raised three kids. All were born in Davenport before moving just outside of Chicago. I spent more than a few nights up late because of a sick child so I feel for you. But , now I'm frequently up all night because of my own health reasons.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bishop1971
I raised three kids. All were born in Davenport before moving just outside of Chicago. I spent more than a few nights up late because of a sick child so I feel for you. But , now I'm frequently up all night because of my own health reasons.
Unfortunately I'm going to be 52 soon. My 2nd wife is just about 40. No pics. Gabby was a surprise.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LarryMullenJr.
Ha! I broke up with a girl because she was a communist. No offense to any Democrats.
I'm far more socialist. Commies are conservatives. Socialists do things like farmer subsidies. Commies are fascists. A republican trait historically.
 
But once again a thread goes sideways. So Slater field is obviously named after a great and important player. Niles Heisman speech alone puts him up there also. These are just gimmies though. Bob Sanders could be said as he seemed to be a key factor into our football team unless it's just basketball then I'm sticking with Lester and Clark.
 
I'm far more socialist. Commies are conservatives. Socialists do things like farmer subsidies. Commies are fascists. A republican trait historically.
Actually, the path to Communism goes through socialism first. You must think that Antifa is a far right Republican group?! Ha. Antifa is not against fascism, they are fascists and they are not Republicans .Republicans are for less government, smaller government with less restrictions.
 
Actually, the path to Communism goes through socialism first. You must think that Antifa is a far right Republican group?! Ha. Antifa is not against fascism, they are fascists and they are not Republicans .Republicans are for less government, smaller government with less restrictions.
No. It's actually a liberal extremes that are anti fascist gtoup. Communist are closely related to fascist regimes historically. So historically the republican party has a fascist extremist movement while democrats have a socialist extremist behavior. Just political science class kicking in. I obviously don't identify with either party.
 
Actually, the path to Communism goes through socialism first. You must think that Antifa is a far right Republican group?! Ha. Antifa is not against fascism, they are fascists and they are not Republicans .Republicans are for less government, smaller government with less restrictions.
As far as I can tell, Antifa is anarchist, not fascist.
 
As far as I can tell, Antifa is anarchist, not fascist.
They are against fascism like Trump is attracted to. They stand up against right wing nut jobs marching with nazi flags and white supremacists. Antifascism is what this country is supposed to be. They are not anarchist.
 
Last edited:
They are against fascism like Trump is attracted to. They stand up against right wing nut jobs marching with nazi flags and white supremacists. Antifascism is what this country is supposed to be. They are not anarchist, duh.
First, Republicans are not Nazi flag carrying white supremacists. Second, Antifa doesn't care about white supremacists or those who carry Nazi flags. They riot and burn where they are paid to riot and burn and if a few people get killed, they still don't care. Third, Trump is an America first conservative who believes in the Reagan doctrine of keeping the peace through a show of strength and he certainly wasn't a racist and was given awards for the opportunities he gave to black America..
 
First, Republicans are not Nazi flag carrying white supremacists. Second, Antifa doesn't care about white supremacists or those who carry orum. Nazi flags. They riot and burn where they are paid to riot and burn and if a few people get killed, they still don't care. Third, Trump is an America first conservative who believes in the Reagan doctrine of keeping the peace through a show of strength and he certainly wasn't a racist and was given awards for the opportunities he gave to black America..
Lets take this to the off topic forum. You are historically wrong on a lot of things. Trump has fascist traits unlike Grassley who is a real Reagan style republican. He was actually anti fascist which a lot of Republicans are but historically there are some times that the Republicans turn towards fascism much like democrats will swing towards socailist views. But the truth is that there are only a few differences between parties except for the very conservative and very liberal groups. I am a liberal but not a Democrat. I fully believe in a socialist capitalism form of government. Just hit me up on the off topic board and we can discuss specific instances of the Republicans especially Trump having fascist behavior. Honestly i want Trump in jail for planning and trying to carry out a coup in jan 6th. Plus his many other crimes and no way did he support the black community. That's very very untrue. So off topic board for this.
 
I hit you up in the off topic forum. I wish the big 10 network would carry older games like in the 70's and 60's to remember some of the great hawkeye players of old. Clark simply put, does things no one else does in womens basketball. Boston and Reese are great players but don't compare to Clark. She has to always be in the conversation for greatest hawkeye.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hermanski
So, how many scoring records did Ronnie have as compared to Clark? Did Ronnie ever lead the nation in scoring AND assists? Ronnie's career highs were 2.5 rebounds and 6.0 assists and he never averaged 20 points in any season. His career average was 16.9 points a game. He was 2nd team All-American his Junior year and he was twice All Big Ten. I don't need to list all the awards and accolades that have been bestowed on Clark and if I did, that list would bury Ronnie. Ronnie was a wonderful player who seemingly gets better as time goes by and , by all accounts, an even better human being.
Really. You are using statistics from the woman's game as your marker. The game where nobody plays defense and I mean nobody. The game where the majority of her assists came from dumping the ball into a center who turned and shot a layup because the defense is just so, so good. The game where they play with a smaller ball, and Clark looks fast because everyone else is so slow it hurts to watch them run. Ronnie Lester never missed as many layups as Clark does and he didn't average nearly 5 turnovers a game against a much more physical defense than Clark will ever see.
Tell you what. Put the Iowa Womens team up against the Iowa Men's team where each player on the winning team gets $1,000 for every point they win by, and we'll see how good Clark and for that matter how good the women's game is.

Clark is great for the women's game but there is no way she is the best ever. She plays in what might be a high-level division 3 men's college league. No comparison.
 
Lets take this to the off topic forum. You are historically wrong on a lot of things. Trump has fascist traits unlike Grassley who is a real Reagan style republican. He was actually anti fascist which a lot of Republicans are but historically there are some times that the Republicans turn towards fascism much like democrats will swing towards socailist views. But the truth is that there are only a few differences between parties except for the very conservative and very liberal groups. I am a liberal but not a Democrat. I fully believe in a socialist capitalism form of government. Just hit me up on the off topic board and we can discuss specific instances of the Republicans especially Trump having fascist behavior. Honestly i want Trump in jail for planning and trying to carry out a coup in jan 6th. Plus his many other crimes and no way did he support the black community. That's very very untrue. So off topic board for this.
If you want to take it to the off-topic forum. Why did you write a screed about Trump? By the way, please provide any evidence you have that proves your statements. By evidence I don't media reports or comments by politicians because the media has been wrong about so many things in the last 5 years that they now enjoy a credibility ranking right up there with used car salesman.
Provide real evidence. Not rhetoric or opinion.
 
Really. You are using statistics from the woman's game as your marker. The game where nobody plays defense and I mean nobody. The game where the majority of her assists came from dumping the ball into a center who turned and shot a layup because the defense is just so, so good. The game where they play with a smaller ball, and Clark looks fast because everyone else is so slow it hurts to watch them run. Ronnie Lester never missed as many layups as Clark does and he didn't average nearly 5 turnovers a game against a much more physical defense than Clark will ever see.
Tell you what. Put the Iowa Womens team up against the Iowa Men's team where each player on the winning team gets $1,000 for every point they win by, and we'll see how good Clark and for that matter how good the women's game is.

Clark is great for the women's game but there is no way she is the best ever. She plays in what might be a high-level division 3 men's college league. No comparison.
My goodness. Your entire premise is flawed here. First Clark DOES play womans basketball, because she's a woman. That doesn't diminish her greatness in anyway. They play with a smaller ball, because they have smaller hands. Again thats obvious, and ALL the woman play with the same ball, so thats moot. A for your comment about defense, again WAY off base. Just like the men teams nationally are rated by how they rank against their peers defending. Iowa played several of the top defensive teams in the tourney, and the B1G, and she torched them all, including South Carolina who held ALL other teams in check to an average of 20 some points below their average, and around 38% shooting. So Clark drops 41 on them after a 41 point triple double against Louisville, (also a good defensive team). To add, if you REALLY believe that Clark gets most of her assists by simply "dumping the ball" onto the post, then its obvious you don't watch her games and how 1/3 of her assists are on the fast break as she rips and runs in transition. Her post feeds are much more then just dump downs, and her passing is almost always on time and right where the post needs it to score with the least effort. She often directs the post with hand gestures, moving them to the most effecient spot to receive the pass. Many of her turnovers, (which have gone down every year) are because she see's the game faster then her team mates, and often makes passes they just aren't prepared for. And yes she attempts some that just aren't there at times.

Trying to compare Clark by saying she'd be a D3 level mens player is foolish at best. She's not a man, and should not be expected to be one physically. That doesn't for one second mean she hasn't changed the way HER game is played unlike any Iowa player, man or woman. To use your analogy the men should be able to drop three's at a 38% rate from the half court line because they are stronger, correct? Just for the record, in this previous season Clark led ALL of college basketball in three point % from beyond 26ft at over 36% and that was for BOTH men and women. That why she's called logo Clark.

Like many here, I saw Ronnie play, and followed Downtown Freddy and JJ and their undefeated B1G 1970 team, (on the radio), and they were all GREAT players. BUT none of them changed their game the way Clark has changed hers. Thats not debateable .
 
Ronnie Lester: #1 by far. Fred Brown, John Johnson, Keegan Murray, Luka Garza is starting 5 for me. Super Sam Williams as the sixth man - and a strong case could be for him in the starting 5; he was exceptional.
I’d sit JJ and go with Sudden Sam...Williams was really a great collegiate baller...He, more than any player laid the foundation for Miller’s Iowa success.
 
My goodness. Your entire premise is flawed here. First Clark DOES play womans basketball, because she's a woman. That doesn't diminish her greatness in anyway. They play with a smaller ball, because they have smaller hands. Again thats obvious, and ALL the woman play with the same ball, so thats moot. A for your comment about defense, again WAY off base. Just like the men teams nationally are rated by how they rank against their peers defending. Iowa played several of the top defensive teams in the tourney, and the B1G, and she torched them all, including South Carolina who held ALL other teams in check to an average of 20 some points below their average, and around 38% shooting. So Clark drops 41 on them after a 41 point triple double against Louisville, (also a good defensive team). To add, if you REALLY believe that Clark gets most of her assists by simply "dumping the ball" onto the post, then its obvious you don't watch her games and how 1/3 of her assists are on the fast break as she rips and runs in transition. Her post feeds are much more then just dump downs, and her passing is almost always on time and right where the post needs it to score with the least effort. She often directs the post with hand gestures, moving them to the most effecient spot to receive the pass. Many of her turnovers, (which have gone down every year) are because she see's the game faster then her team mates, and often makes passes they just aren't prepared for. And yes she attempts some that just aren't there at times.

Trying to compare Clark by saying she'd be a D3 level mens player is foolish at best. She's not a man, and should not be expected to be one physically. That doesn't for one second mean she hasn't changed the way HER game is played unlike any Iowa player, man or woman. To use your analogy the men should be able to drop three's at a 38% rate from the half court line because they are stronger, correct? Just for the record, in this previous season Clark led ALL of college basketball in three point % from beyond 26ft at over 36% and that was for BOTH men and women. That why she's called logo Clark.

Like many here, I saw Ronnie play, and followed Downtown Freddy and JJ and their undefeated B1G 1970 team, (on the radio), and they were all GREAT players. BUT none of them changed their game the way Clark has changed hers. Thats not debateable .
All the points you make support my position vs yours and your argument continues to fall back on statistics like scoring 41 against a good defensive team. Again, this supports my position. Great against females, ehh against males. As for her passing, please. Most of her passes are telegraphed and a decent defender would stop the vast majority of them. Also, if you pay attention to the game, rarely do defenders ever find the ball on a fast break. Most of the time they are running down court with their backs to ball.
She is the best female player at Iowa ever. She is not the best player at Iowa ever.
Apparently, you are one of those people who believe that there is a physical difference between men and women which I also support, but again, the question was the best player, and that she is not. As for being able to shoot from half court, which she does not do on anything resembling a consistent basis, (she shoots from the extended logo, not half court) we' would have to see how the men do with a Jr. High men's basketball.
I have no argument with the statement that she is the best Iowa female basketball player, but nothing points to her being the best ever.
 
All the points you make support my position vs yours and your argument continues to fall back on statistics like scoring 41 against a good defensive team. Again, this supports my position. Great against females, ehh against males. As for her passing, please. Most of her passes are telegraphed and a decent defender would stop the vast majority of them. Also, if you pay attention to the game, rarely do defenders ever find the ball on a fast break. Most of the time they are running down court with their backs to ball.
She is the best female player at Iowa ever. She is not the best player at Iowa ever.
Apparently, you are one of those people who believe that there is a physical difference between men and women which I also support, but again, the question was the best player, and that she is not. As for being able to shoot from half court, which she does not do on anything resembling a consistent basis, (she shoots from the extended logo, not half court) we' would have to see how the men do with a Jr. High men's basketball.
I have no argument with the statement that she is the best Iowa female basketball player, but nothing points to her being the best ever.
Your statement that she's great against females, and Ehh against males, says it all. Nothing more needs be said. You obviously have no interest in how she has changed her sport. Have a great day though.....
 
All the points you make support my position vs yours and your argument continues to fall back on statistics like scoring 41 against a good defensive team. Again, this supports my position. Great against females, ehh against males. As for her passing, please. Most of her passes are telegraphed and a decent defender would stop the vast majority of them. Also, if you pay attention to the game, rarely do defenders ever find the ball on a fast break. Most of the time they are running down court with their backs to ball.
She is the best female player at Iowa ever. She is not the best player at Iowa ever.
Apparently, you are one of those people who believe that there is a physical difference between men and women which I also support, but again, the question was the best player, and that she is not. As for being able to shoot from half court, which she does not do on anything resembling a consistent basis, (she shoots from the extended logo, not half court) we' would have to see how the men do with a Jr. High men's basketball.
I have no argument with the statement that she is the best Iowa female basketball player, but nothing points to her being the best ever.
I'll just say this. Admittedly until the last several years I payed little attention to the womens game. Their success the last 5 or 6 years and Clarks play have changed that, and having 4 grand daughters now I guess changed my perspective on girls sports. We raised three sons, so girls sports we're the farthest thing from my mind. I guess at this point, I just don't agree that you seem to think our womens team playing for the National title is somehow less meaningful for the University then the men if they were to ever get there. This is not 1990, and womens sports have an impact on prestige and $$. The womens team has developed a following and fan base that exceeds the mens team and for good reason. They sell out Carver, (possibly all of next years games). All the players have T shirts designed about them. You don't see any of that with the mens team. Maybe Clark is not the greatest basketball player at the University based solely on athleticism, but she's no slouch there either, and she's been the most impactful player of either gender.
 
Ronnie Lester.
Not just because I am older and watched him play.
I remember like it was yesterday. My Dad leaning over to me and saying, "keep your eye on this freshman Lester . He is going to be a good one"
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bishop1971
If you want to take it to the off-topic forum. Why did you write a screed about Trump? By the way, please provide any evidence you have that proves your statements. By evidence I don't media reports or comments by politicians because the media has been wrong about so many things in the last 5 years that they now enjoy a credibility ranking right up there with used car salesman.
Provide real evidence. Not rhetoric or opinion.
I took it to the off topic board. I then came back to this thread and posted about the topic of the thread. Blow me. I did the right thing taking it to off topic and you still complain.
 
If you want to take it to the off-topic forum. Why did you write a screed about Trump? By the way, please provide any evidence you have that proves your statements. By evidence I don't media reports or comments by politicians because the media has been wrong about so many things in the last 5 years that they now enjoy a credibility ranking right up there with used car salesman.
Provide real evidence. Not rhetoric or opinion.
His twitter and sworn testimony, affidavits, checks from his charity etc
Go to the off topic board and I'll supply all the evidence you want. The man is a narcissistic delusional a$$hat.
 
Last edited:
I'll just say this. Admittedly until the last several years I payed little attention to the womens game. Their success the last 5 or 6 years and Clarks play have changed that, and having 4 grand daughters now I guess changed my perspective on girls sports. We raised three sons, so girls sports we're the farthest thing from my mind. I guess at this point, I just don't agree that you seem to think our womens team playing for the National title is somehow less meaningful for the University then the men if they were to ever get there. This is not 1990, and womens sports have an impact on prestige and $$. The womens team has developed a following and fan base that exceeds the mens team and for good reason. They sell out Carver, (possibly all of next years games). All the players have T shirts designed about them. You don't see any of that with the mens team. Maybe Clark is not the greatest basketball player at the University based solely on athleticism, but she's no slouch there either, and she's been the most impactful player of either gender.
That's why i pick both Caitlin and Ronnie. Both packed arenas and both were the ones carrying their team to the final four. They were/sre stars that outshined everyone else imo.
 
I raised three kids. All were born in Davenport before moving just outside of Chicago. I spent more than a few nights up late because of a sick child so I feel for you. But , now I'm frequently up all night because of my own health reasons.
I got up today at 3:30 as she was sick yesterday with a tummy issue. So now after 5 she's changed, fed, and fast asleep. I'm on my 3rd cup of coffee and heading to work early today so i can nap later. My mom is wanting to babysit so all thr better. One kid is enough for me. I can't imagine how many hours of sleep you must have missed,!!!!! Lol!!! I hope your health issues get better. I'll pray for you. It can't hurt.
 
If I'm reading this correctly, the claim is importance to the team and not regarding national recognition. Individual greatness plus making everyone around them better. Stat comparison is apples-and-oranges given style of play, no three-point line, etc. Brookins may have been the only guy during Ronnie's time who shot from today's three-point distance, and it was rare when he did. If he had even attempted one from Clark range and missed Olson would have yanked him immediately.

I guess we could ask Magic Johnson to sort this out. Back in the day, he said Ronnie was the best point guard he played against in college, and today he love's Caitlin's game.

For myself, I was assuming men's basketball, so now will have to amend my selection and say Clark is #1. She dominates the game like no one else and her impact goes well beyond her team.
That's a great take on this. I forgot about magic Johnson praising Ronnie and calling him the best gaurd he ever played against.
 
Lets take this to the off topic forum. You are historically wrong on a lot of things. Trump has fascist traits unlike Grassley who is a real Reagan style republican. He was actually anti fascist which a lot of Republicans are but historically there are some times that the Republicans turn towards fascism much like democrats will swing towards socailist views. But the truth is that there are only a few differences between parties except for the very conservative and very liberal groups. I am a liberal but not a Democrat. I fully believe in a socialist capitalism form of government. Just hit me up on the off topic board and we can discuss specific instances of the Republicans especially Trump having fascist behavior. Honestly i want Trump in jail for planning and trying to carry out a coup in jan 6th. Plus his many other crimes and no way did he support the black community. That's very very untrue. So off topic board for this.
Take it anywhere you want to take this discussion. I have a 43 year old daughter who is a liberal and there is no talking to her about Trump. She, nor you, can grasp the truth and, instead expose your delusional opinions without shame. Make yourself comfortable as the Democrats take this country down but you need to know that people like you made it happen. The only board that your opinions should be discussed on would be the ''Deranged, Delusional, and the Politically Morally Dishonest Board''. Be sure and let everyone know how we need to fix the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.
 
Take it anywhere you want to take this discussion. I have a 43 year old daughter who is a liberal and there is no talking to her about Trump. She, nor you, can grasp the truth and, instead expose your delusional opinions without shame. Make yourself comfortable as the Democrats take this country down but you need to know that people like you made it happen. The only board that your opinions should be discussed on would be the ''Deranged, Delusional, and the Politically Morally Dishonest Board''. Be sure and let everyone know how we need to fix the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.
Go ahead and celebrate and support your fearless leader who organized an attempted seizure of a duly elected government. It does get any more corrupt and immoral than being a traitor. But you go ahead and blame the Dems. It fits your agenda.
 
First, Republicans are not Nazi flag carrying white supremacists. Second, Antifa doesn't care about white supremacists or those who carry Nazi flags. They riot and burn where they are paid to riot and burn and if a few people get killed, they still don't care. Third, Trump is an America first conservative who believes in the Reagan doctrine of keeping the peace through a show of strength and he certainly wasn't a racist and was given awards for the opportunities he gave to black America..
Reagan would have been drummed out of trump's republican party as too sensible. My how times have changed!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bishop1971
Take it anywhere you want to take this discussion. I have a 43 year old daughter who is a liberal and there is no talking to her about Trump. She, nor you, can grasp the truth and, instead expose your delusional opinions without shame. Make yourself comfortable as the Democrats take this country down but you need to know that people like you made it happen. The only board that your opinions should be discussed on would be the ''Deranged, Delusional, and the Politically Morally Dishonest Board''. Be sure and let everyone know how we need to fix the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.
Going to be very strange to have the likely nominee from the GOP facing multiple criminal trials while running for president. Even stranger that so many still believe that Trump would be a good choice as the next president. Both Biden and Trump are also too old. Maybe the country can catch a break and both can develop serious health issues that cause different candidates to run for president in 2024.
 
Take it anywhere you want to take this discussion. I have a 43 year old daughter who is a liberal and there is no talking to her about Trump. She, nor you, can grasp the truth and, instead expose your delusional opinions without shame. Make yourself comfortable as the Democrats take this country down but you need to know that people like you made it happen. The only board that your opinions should be discussed on would be the ''Deranged, Delusional, and the Politically Morally Dishonest Board''. Be sure and let everyone know how we need to fix the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.
Paying a porn star 10 grand for sex then 100 grand for her to keep it secret. Being on a mic and bragging about forcing women into sex. Writing checks from a charity for meals and personal purchases, inspiring and pushing people into a coup and wanting to ignore the constitution, etc... Republicans are the ones tearing down this country. I'm reasonable and listen to proper discourse but Republicans refuse and just blindy follow Trump and Cruz, plus Johnson. Hysterical, you're a blind sheep. And from Iowa where our farmers rely on the democrats for subsidies and equal taxation so the rich can pay a smaller amount of taxes than someone working minimum wage. I can go on about supply side economics or how Obama walked into a major recession with banks about to fold or how Clinton got the economy going. How about 200 million new jobs by Biden. You're an uneducated moron
 
Go ahead and celebrate and support your fearless leader who organized an attempted seizure of a duly elected government. It does get any more corrupt and immoral than being a traitor. But you go ahead and blame the Dems. It fits your agenda.
Another f' ing idiot heard from. Tell me, fool, how many coup d'état 's have there been in the history of the world where the aggressors had absolutely no weapons to aid them in their attempt to overthrow the government? Fortunately for the Democrats, there are tragically stupid people who actually believed their January 6th bullshit.
 
Paying a porn star 10 grand for sex then 100 grand for her to keep it secret. Being on a mic and bragging about forcing women into sex. Writing checks from a charity for meals and personal purchases, inspiring and pushing people into a coup and wanting to ignore the constitution, etc... Republicans are the ones tearing down this country. I'm reasonable and listen to proper discourse but Republicans refuse and just blindy follow Trump and Cruz, plus Johnson. Hysterical, you're a blind sheep. And from Iowa where our farmers rely on the democrats for subsidies and equal taxation so the rich can pay a smaller amount of taxes than someone working minimum wage. I can go on about supply side economics or how Obama walked into a major recession with banks about to fold or how Clinton got the economy going. How about 200 million new jobs by Biden. You're an uneducated moron
Ah, typical. So may lies. So little truth. I could go through your response line by item, but it would be a waste of time. Getting someone to believe lies is much easier than trying to get that person to believe the truth because you first have to make him believe that he was wrong.
 
Take it anywhere you want to take this discussion. I have a 43 year old daughter who is a liberal and there is no talking to her about Trump. She, nor you, can grasp the truth and, instead expose your delusional opinions without shame. Make yourself comfortable as the Democrats take this country down but you need to know that people like you made it happen. The only board that your opinions should be discussed on would be the ''Deranged, Delusional, and the Politically Morally Dishonest Board''. Be sure and let everyone know how we need to fix the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.
Trump tried to force pence into ignoring the constitution for crying out loud. And senators besides. Morally dishonest? Trump is as dishonest as any president ever. Bush ran this country into the ground and democrats saved it. Idiots. They make me so mad. Can't have a real discussion cause it's just fantasy. And the nazis and white supremacists are Republicans, not democrats. You associate white supremacists directly to the Republicans cause they refuse to do anything about them. They want their vote so much you dirty yourself by association. You and the Proud Boys are the ones who support Trump. What does that tell you? Answer that 1 question
 
Ah, typical. So may lies. So little truth. I could go through your response line by item, but it would be a waste of time. Getting someone to believe lies is much easier than trying to get that person to believe the truth because you first have to make him believe that he was wrong.
Sorry for going ballistic on you. I don't like being personally insulted. Let's agree to disagree and root for our Hawkeyes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mtown66
Another f' ing idiot heard from. Tell me, fool, how many coup d'état 's have there been in the history of the world where the aggressors had absolutely no weapons to aid them in their attempt to overthrow the government? Fortunately for the Democrats, there are tragically stupid people who actually believed their January 6th bullshit.
If you believe Jan 6th and the attempts otherwise to overthrow the election result were OK, maybe you need to broaden your sources for news.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT