Travel wasn't stopped. You're flailing. Badly. In defense of a lifelong fraud. Why?
I never said it was stopped. Try to read more closely.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/fauci-trump-travel-restrictions-saved-lives-coronavirus
Travel wasn't stopped. You're flailing. Badly. In defense of a lifelong fraud. Why?
Depends does she scrape? Do i control the amount of laughing gas that gets dispensed and how many/what kind of pain pills do I get for the root canal?Duh.
What's more desirable? A blow job or a root canal?
You used the word "ban".I never said it was stopped. Try to read more closely.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/fauci-trump-travel-restrictions-saved-lives-coronavirus
Those are just numbers of bombs.Fewer than died here.
![]()
Oh, am I off ignore full time or is this a one off?Those are just numbers of bombs.
I'm sure they didn't hurt or kill anyone.
History will not be kind to Trump.
History is written by the winners.
Only if the progressives finally complete their genocide.LOL exactly. 1950s style regressives will go extinct eventually.
You used the word "ban".
If only everyone was sane.How anyone could possibly consider Trump a better person than Obama is beyond comprehension for any sane person.
Okay, my bad. Whatever. "Folks like me" would have done whatever the pandemic response office recommended.My original post:
"Think of how many more there'd be if folks like you hadn't stopped most travel from China."
Not sure if that phrase really applies here. I think being the only major non-Hillary option on the ballot, awarded him the keys to the car.History is written by the winners.
I'm not talking about election winners. I'm talking about those who win the right to write the history books.Not sure if that phrase really applies here. I think being the only major non-Hillary option on the ballot, awarded him the keys to the car.
Based on which morally bad decisions that are factual, do u base that on?Obama easily, still doesn't make him a good person.
U are technically right, but ive really only heard that phrase regarding royal dynasties, industry leaders, the winner of the war, political figures that ran countries for longer periods, etc. etc. Not to mention the phrase was usually applied to past times when people had a lot harder time receiving the facts about really happened.I'm not talking about election winners. I'm talking about those who win the right to write the history books.
I'd take the beej but that's just like, my opinion, man.Duh.
What's more desirable? A blow job or a root canal?
Now up toWhat are...posters who should have their citizenship revoked, Alex!
Obama was far more racist! He hates white people!Obama killed way more brown people than Trump has.
Can you provide some examples of Obama's racism?Obama was far more racist! He hates white people!
I admit. I haven't heard of half this list.Now up to
Surprisingly, a lot of those guys were not already on my ignore list. I must be slipping.
- standiego
- Movillehawk
- Titus Andronicus
- ottumwan in tx
- 1flyer
- retrohawki
- hawkguy77
- SotaHawk87
- 515Hawkeye
- ATLNole1
- mcgrawfsu
Then again, as a liberal, I'm very forgiving. I let people off my ignore list if I spot them saying something noticeably civilized.
Which reminds me of an improvement I'd like to see to the forum layout: Put a "Show Ignored Posters" button at the top of the page, as well as at the bottom. Or perhaps have an "Always Show Ignored Posters" setting. Why? Because I don't actually want their posts eliminated. I just want them flagged as people who usually aren't worth the effort.
I admit. I haven't heard of half this list.
We leave you chasing your tail.Like I said, empiracists are my favorite little mice.
The first quote isn't from any of b Obama's books but is a review of his book by Steve Sailer. Also the title of the book is wrong in this inaccurate meme.
Obama directs national security agencies to boost minoritiesCan you provide some examples of Obama's racism?
Okay, my bad. Whatever. "Folks like me" would have done whatever the pandemic response office recommended.
From your own link.Obama directs national security agencies to boost minorities
A presidential memo for the CIA and other agencies mentions steps such as adding training on 'unconscious bias'
By NAHAL TOOSI
10/05/2016 08:40 AM EDT
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter
President Barack Obama is directing America's national security agencies to promote more diversity in their ranks, arguing that inclusiveness is an "imperative" in a still-dangerous but increasingly interconnected world.
Obama lays out his instructions in a Presidential Memorandum released Wednesday.
The memo, whose details were shared first with POLITICO, directs government departments and agencies to take several steps aimed at cultivating a more diverse workforce. They include: improving the collection and publication of data related to workforce diversity; providing employees more access to professional development opportunities; and expanding the training offered on "implicit or unconscious bias, inclusion, and flexible work policies."
National Security Adviser Susan Rice, in a recent speech, stressed that a more diverse workforce, in agencies ranging from the FBI to the State Department, is crucial for continued U.S. strength on the global stage, arguing it can help Americans avoid the perils of "groupthink."
Obama DOJ drops charges against alleged broker of Libyan weapons
By KENNETH P. VOGEL and JOSH GERSTEIN
In a blog post published alongside the president's memorandum, Rice says the U.S. national security workforce "has not yet drawn fully" on the strength America's own diverse make-up offers. She notes "minorities make up less than 20 percent of our senior diplomats and 15 percent of senior military officers and senior intelligence officials," even though "nearly 40 percent of the approximately 320 million people in the United States are minorities."
"The leadership of men and women who may not share similar backgrounds lends much needed diversity of thought and creativity to our responses to some of the world’s toughest problems," Rice writes in the post.
According to a fact sheet issued alongside the memo, some 3 million civilians and military personnel in the U.S. government work in the national security arena, including the intelligence agencies. But, compared to the wider federal government, the national security workforce is less diverse.
The fact sheet and memo suggest that the Obama administration is defining diversity very broadly, whether it be people with special language skills or people with various racial, religious or sexual identities. There are no calls for quotas for any groups.
"Promoting diversity and inclusion ensures that national security departments and agencies can recruit their employees from the broadest possible pool of talent and bring a wide range of perspectives, skills, and backgrounds to bear to tackle our toughest problems," the fact sheet states.
The memorandum builds on past efforts by Obama to promote diversity in the broader federal workforce, including an executive order issued in 2011. Since then, a number of steps have been taken to fulfill the president's goal, including the Defense Department's decision to open all military occupations to women and transgender people.
Sounds inclusive, but using race quotas is racist. It just is.
Obama killed way more brown people than Trump has.