ADVERTISEMENT

Biden has poisoned any immigration amnesty by not enforcing border

NorthernHawkeye

HR Legend
Dec 23, 2007
33,960
25,314
113
American communities are being overrun by a historic border crisis that is a direct result of poor but intentional policy decisions by the Biden administration. And what is the president’s message to the American people that have been impacted by this security and humanitarian crisis? There are "more important" things going on than visiting the border.

Such a statement defies belief and the facts – we are currently witnessing a record number of unaccompanied alien children (UACs) trafficked over the border, migrant women physically, emotionally and sexually assaulted along the way, and hundreds of thousands of known illegal alien "gotaways" flooding into American communities. A token visit to the southern border won’t solve the crisis, but the president’s dismissive response reveals that the Biden administration is unconcerned with the carnage and lawlessness that are unfolding.

Reversing this devastating crisis will require tough decisions regarding the enforcement of immigration law. Instead, some in Congress are pushing for legislation in the lame duck session of Congress to provide amnesty for so-called "Dreamers" — illegal aliens who claim to have arrived in the U.S. as minors. Promoting amnesty for 2–3 million "young" illegal aliens, which goes far beyond the roughly 650,000 illegal aliens with Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA), will fuel further waves of trafficked UACs.

The reported immigration compromise being hammered out behind closed doors is a gross misalignment of priorities compared to what the American people want. It is irresponsible and should be soundly rejected.

According to reports, several senators want to pair large-scale amnesty with funding for more Border Patrol agents, bonuses for the agents, a one-year extension of Title 42, and supposedly quicker processing of asylum claims. Having direct responsibility for managing multiple border crises, I can tell you this approach will not fix the crisis. Instead, this approach is a continuation of the Biden administration’s two-year failure simply to manage the crisis rather than trying to solve it. And the results will be the same.

Throwing money at the problem will not secure the border. It will just convert it into a Congress-funded border crisis. And while the overworked and disrespected Border Patrol agents deserve a raise, Biden administration policies will continue to hamper their ability to execute their law enforcement responsibilities. While faster adjudication of asylum claims may sound appealing, in practice, it will have the opposite effect and will result in more economic migrants who are ineligible for asylum being released into the country. Does anyone really believe the Biden administration will ramp up deportations after two years of record-low removals?

The Biden administration and its allies in Congress have poisoned the well on amnesty by not securing the border first. No rational person would advocate for amnesty during a border crisis that has seen an unprecedented number of UACs trafficked across the border with no plan in place to secure the border today, tomorrow, or ever in the future.

We should not lose sight of the current unaccompanied alien children crisis. During the Biden administration, more than 292,000 UACs have been trafficked across the border and released into American communities. Promoting amnesty while this crisis unfolds is the equivalent of throwing gasoline on an already raging fire.

History shows that even the talk of amnesty by Congress fuels more illegal immigration, as you saw during the failed attempts at "comprehensive immigration reform" in 2007, 2008 and 2013. DACA itself has a legacy of sparking a significant increase in UACs being trafficked to the southern border, beginning just two years after the policy was announced. There is no doubt that the cartels are already using this last-ditch effort to legalize "Dreamers" to entice the next wave of vulnerable migrants to subject themselves to horrific abuse on the journey north under the sales pitch that they will qualify for the next amnesty.

The Supreme Court appears ready to strike down DACA as unconstitutional. If this Congress was serious about legalizing that specific population of illegal aliens, they had two years to do it. Instead, they sat on the sidelines while the executive branch dismantled the border security apparatus it inherited. Now, some in Congress are getting greedy and trying to provide amnesty to a population of illegal aliens at least three times larger than DACA. Only after the Department of Homeland Security secures the border would it be appropriate for Congress to consider the narrower DACA issue.

The Trump administration offered a permanent solution on DACA in exchange for the border security and asylum reforms that would have prevented the current border crisis and potentially future ones from ever manifesting. That failed largely due to the objections of those on the left who are now desperately trying to cobble together votes for amnesty without securing the border. Now is not the time to solve a political problem. Instead, it’s past time actually to secure the border.

Chad Wolf is the former acting secretary of the Department of Homeland Security and senior adviser to America First Works.

 
Last edited:
Step number one has to be changing the current asylum rules,.. Absolutely insane that all an individual has to do is set foot on US soil and they are automatically waved on through to the interior of the country to await their day in court. Doesn't work like this anywhere else on the planet.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GOHOX69
American communities are being overrun by a historic border crisis that is a direct result of poor but intentional policy decisions by the Biden administration. And what is the president’s message to the American people that have been impacted by this security and humanitarian crisis? There are "more important" things going on than visiting the border.

Such a statement defies belief and the facts – we are currently witnessing a record number of unaccompanied alien children (UACs) trafficked over the border, migrant women physically, emotionally and sexually assaulted along the way, and hundreds of thousands of known illegal alien "gotaways" flooding into American communities. A token visit to the southern border won’t solve the crisis, but the president’s dismissive response reveals that the Biden administration is unconcerned with the carnage and lawlessness that are unfolding.

Reversing this devastating crisis will require tough decisions regarding the enforcement of immigration law. Instead, some in Congress are pushing for legislation in the lame duck session of Congress to provide amnesty for so-called "Dreamers" — illegal aliens who claim to have arrived in the U.S. as minors. Promoting amnesty for 2–3 million "young" illegal aliens, which goes far beyond the roughly 650,000 illegal aliens with Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA), will fuel further waves of trafficked UACs.

The reported immigration compromise being hammered out behind closed doors is a gross misalignment of priorities compared to what the American people want. It is irresponsible and should be soundly rejected.

According to reports, several senators want to pair large-scale amnesty with funding for more Border Patrol agents, bonuses for the agents, a one-year extension of Title 42, and supposedly quicker processing of asylum claims. Having direct responsibility for managing multiple border crises, I can tell you this approach will not fix the crisis. Instead, this approach is a continuation of the Biden administration’s two-year failure simply to manage the crisis rather than trying to solve it. And the results will be the same.

Throwing money at the problem will not secure the border. It will just convert it into a Congress-funded border crisis. And while the overworked and disrespected Border Patrol agents deserve a raise, Biden administration policies will continue to hamper their ability to execute their law enforcement responsibilities. While faster adjudication of asylum claims may sound appealing, in practice, it will have the opposite effect and will result in more economic migrants who are ineligible for asylum being released into the country. Does anyone really believe the Biden administration will ramp up deportations after two years of record-low removals?

The Biden administration and its allies in Congress have poisoned the well on amnesty by not securing the border first. No rational person would advocate for amnesty during a border crisis that has seen an unprecedented number of UACs trafficked across the border with no plan in place to secure the border today, tomorrow, or ever in the future.

We should not lose sight of the current unaccompanied alien children crisis. During the Biden administration, more than 292,000 UACs have been trafficked across the border and released into American communities. Promoting amnesty while this crisis unfolds is the equivalent of throwing gasoline on an already raging fire.

History shows that even the talk of amnesty by Congress fuels more illegal immigration, as you saw during the failed attempts at "comprehensive immigration reform" in 2007, 2008 and 2013. DACA itself has a legacy of sparking a significant increase in UACs being trafficked to the southern border, beginning just two years after the policy was announced. There is no doubt that the cartels are already using this last-ditch effort to legalize "Dreamers" to entice the next wave of vulnerable migrants to subject themselves to horrific abuse on the journey north under the sales pitch that they will qualify for the next amnesty.

The Supreme Court appears ready to strike down DACA as unconstitutional. If this Congress was serious about legalizing that specific population of illegal aliens, they had two years to do it. Instead, they sat on the sidelines while the executive branch dismantled the border security apparatus it inherited. Now, some in Congress are getting greedy and trying to provide amnesty to a population of illegal aliens at least three times larger than DACA. Only after the Department of Homeland Security secures the border would it be appropriate for Congress to consider the narrower DACA issue.

The Trump administration offered a permanent solution on DACA in exchange for the border security and asylum reforms that would have prevented the current border crisis and potentially future ones from ever manifesting. That failed largely due to the objections of those on the left who are now desperately trying to cobble together votes for amnesty without securing the border. Now is not the time to solve a political problem. Instead, it’s past time actually to secure the border.

Chad Wolf is the former acting secretary of the Department of Homeland Security and senior adviser to America First Works.

How did the Senate races go for you, OP?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rudolph
Step number one has to be changing the current asylum rules,.. Absolutely insane that all an individual has to do is set foot on US soil and they are automatically waved on through to the interior of the country to await their day in court. Doesn't work like this anywhere else on the planet.
That pesky constitution and due process laws. The answer for that is to set immediate or near immediate hearings, providing humane detainment of families as a group with adequate representation for those immigrants. That would cost a huge amount of money.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ree4 and Rudolph
Step number one has to be changing the current asylum rules,.. Absolutely insane that all an individual has to do is set foot on US soil and they are automatically waved on through to the interior of the country to await their day in court. Doesn't work like this anywhere else on the planet.
Step one has to be hammering the s*** out of the employers of illegal workers. Do this, and almost all other issues evaporate.
 
The Border Patrol agent serial killer was convicted yesterday of killing four women.

His confession:
“I wanted to clean up the streets. These people… are dirt, and I was going to get rid of them. Law enforcement doesn’t do anything about them? I will. I’m sick of them.”
 
That pesky constitution and due process laws. The answer for that is to set immediate or near immediate hearings, providing humane detainment of families as a group with adequate representation for those immigrants. That would cost a huge amount of money.

Not at all, and it has nothing to do with our constitution,.. The first adjustment in this area has to be that asylum seekers must be required to apply for asylum in the first available country encountered. We should not be the landing zone for asylum seekers from places like Honduras, Venezuela, Nigeria, Iran or Ukraine,... When you're really drowning you welcome the first life preserver you find.
 
Step one has to be hammering the s*** out of the employers of illegal workers. Do this, and almost all other issues evaporate.

Exactly. Let me know when a C-suite Koch executive is in jail for all the illegal chicken plant employees.

Immigration is a perfect issue of the GOP. Half the GOP wants cheap labor, the other half just wants the issue.

And neither half wants to solve the problem so they can continue to blame the democrats.
 
Not at all, and it has nothing to do with our constitution,.. The first adjustment in this area has to be that asylum seekers must be required to apply for asylum in the first available country encountered. We should not be the landing zone for asylum seekers from places like Honduras, Venezuela, Nigeria, Iran or Ukraine,... When you're really drowning you welcome the first life preserver you find.
Would that be constitutional? Due process says that anyone gets access to the benefit of the law. Anyone. Can that be restricted? To basically deny someone equal access? How do those persons have access to the court when they are potentially thousands of miles away?
 
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman
Would that be constitutional? Due process says that anyone gets access to the benefit of the law. Anyone. Can that be restricted? To basically deny someone equal access? How do those persons have access to the court when they are potentially thousands of miles away?
The statute can be changed. It’s antithetical to the American creed/experience. But the country-particularly Midwest nativists—have adopted a we got her first and close the door behind us position.
 
Would that be constitutional? Due process says that anyone gets access to the benefit of the law. Anyone. Can that be restricted? To basically deny someone equal access? How do those persons have access to the court when they are potentially thousands of miles away?

Yes,... Our asylum laws were not always as open as they are now.
 
The statute can be changed. It’s antithetical to the American creed/experience. But the country-particularly Midwest nativists—have adopted a we got her first and close the door behind us position.
So I don’t think so. You have two people who come to this country seeking asylum. One comes from Mexico and one comes from El Salvador. You’re treating those two individuals differently. That is not equal protection under the law.
 
So I don’t think so. You have two people who come to this country seeking asylum. One comes from Mexico and one comes from El Salvador. You’re treating those two individuals differently. That is not equal protection under the law.
Agreed. But you can change the entire asylum statute to not allow asylum cases, only take a certain number etc.
 
Agreed. But you can change the entire asylum statute to not allow asylum cases, only take a certain number etc.
That’s outside control of the Biden administration. I’d wager that neither of those provisions would garner support in Congress.
 
Not at all, and it has nothing to do with our constitution,.. The first adjustment in this area has to be that asylum seekers must be required to apply for asylum in the first available country encountered. We should not be the landing zone for asylum seekers from places like Honduras, Venezuela, Nigeria, Iran or Ukraine,... When you're really drowning you welcome the first life preserver you find.
Most of these asylum seekers from some of the countries you list, and many that you didn't (South/Latin America) are a direct result from US interventionalist policy over the last several decades. It's a problem that we definitely had a hand in creating. Our chickens are coming home to roost, Bobby.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mthawkeyes
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT