ADVERTISEMENT

Biden Says He’s Considering Pre-emptive Pardons for Potential Trump Targets

cigaretteman

HB King
May 29, 2001
79,094
61,813
113
President Biden said in a new interview published on Wednesday that he was considering pre-emptive pardons for people President-elect Donald J. Trump considered his political enemies, but he added that he had not yet decided what to do.
“A little bit of it depends on who he puts in what positions,” Mr. Biden told USA Today in the interview, which was conducted Sunday.
Mr. Biden was asked whether he would pardon Liz Cheney, the former Republican representative frequently targeted by Mr. Trump and his supporters for her role investigating the Jan. 6, 2021, mob attack on the Capitol, or Dr. Anthony S. Fauci, the former top federal infectious disease official who oversaw the nation’s Covid-19 response.
“I think there are certain people like, if he were to, I don’t want to name their names,” Mr. Biden said, before asking to speak off the record.
Advertisement
SKIP ADVERTISEMENT


Mr. Biden said that he had appealed to the president-elect in a two-hour Oval Office meeting after the election. “I tried to make it clear that there was no need, and it was counterintuitive to go back and try to settle scores,” Mr. Biden said. But Mr. Trump did not say how he would handle his threats of retribution.
“He didn’t reinforce it; he just basically listened,” Mr. Biden said.
Since late last year, Mr. Biden’s staff has considered what the pardons might look like were Mr. Biden to pursue them, including how to extend executive clemency to a list of current and former government officials for any possible crimes over a period of years.
Mr. Trump told NBC recently that he would like to jail members of the congressional panel that investigated the Jan. 6 attack. Ms. Cheney served on the panel. At least two of its other members, Senator Adam Schiff, a Democrat from California, and Adam Kinzinger, the former Republican representative, have said they do not want pardons, arguing that accepting one would falsely suggest that they had committed crimes.
“It would be the wrong precedent to set,” Mr. Schiff told CNN earlier this week. “I don’t want to see each president hereafter on their way out the door giving out a broad category of pardons.”

 
They would absolutely still be called to answer and wouldn't br able to hide behind the 5th amendment. If they refused to answer or lied they can then be charged for those crimes.

The pardons indicate Biden has plenty to hide and this entire thing needs a hefty dose of sunlight.
 
Immunity for actions taken as a result of carrying out the duties of the presidential office....

No

He was given complete immunity for anything he did while communicating with anyone in his cabinet and it doesn't matter what the topic was.

Just because someone is in your cabinet doesn't mean whatever you say to them is part of your presidential duty.
 
Go ahead and issue the pardons,.. The truth can still be pursued and published with the disclaimer that no prosecution will ever take place because of the Biden pardon,.. This would provide a fitting end to Joe's legacy.
not only that, but fifth amendment immunity can't be invoked as a basis for refusing to provide testimony or documents. (which, come to think of it, might be why some people don't want one)

then again congressional investigation's ain't worth squat.
 
No

He was given complete immunity for anything he did while communicating with anyone in his cabinet and it doesn't matter what the topic was.

Just because someone is in your cabinet doesn't mean whatever you say to them is part of your presidential duty.
Biden can do anything he wants now. Pardons are part of his presidential duties. As for yes he can but he shouldn’t. Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha. We’re way past that now thanks to all of the norm breaking involved in Congress, the judiciary, and the presidency. Anything you can get away with is now fair game. Them the rules.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tom Paris and Moral
It's horrible that it's come to this, that is the actual point. If only Kamala didn't have that goofy laugh you might have had a choice.
She also needed to interview more. That wouldn't have made Bins change his vote from Trump to her, but between the few weeks with no interviews and her laugh, it was an easy choice.
 
They would absolutely still be called to answer and wouldn't br able to hide behind the 5th amendment. If they refused to answer or lied they can then be charged for those crimes.

The pardons indicate Biden has plenty to hide and this entire thing needs a hefty dose of sunlight.

There is nothing to answer for. There is no question any of them would not want to answer. There is no genuine crime remotely alluded to by any of the people Trump has targeted. He simply wants to go after people who he considers to be enemies.

You’re an idiot.
 
  • Like
Reactions: noStemsnoSTICKS
She also needed to interview more. That wouldn't have made Bins change his vote from Trump to her, but between the few weeks with no interviews and her laugh, it was an easy choice.
And those insane ideas about taxing the rich? Worst candidate ever. Don't even get me started on how she let Greenland and Panama shove the US around.
 
President Biden said in a new interview published on Wednesday that he was considering pre-emptive pardons for people President-elect Donald J. Trump considered his political enemies, but he added that he had not yet decided what to do.
“A little bit of it depends on who he puts in what positions,” Mr. Biden told USA Today in the interview, which was conducted Sunday.
Mr. Biden was asked whether he would pardon Liz Cheney, the former Republican representative frequently targeted by Mr. Trump and his supporters for her role investigating the Jan. 6, 2021, mob attack on the Capitol, or Dr. Anthony S. Fauci, the former top federal infectious disease official who oversaw the nation’s Covid-19 response.
“I think there are certain people like, if he were to, I don’t want to name their names,” Mr. Biden said, before asking to speak off the record.
Advertisement
SKIP ADVERTISEMENT


Mr. Biden said that he had appealed to the president-elect in a two-hour Oval Office meeting after the election. “I tried to make it clear that there was no need, and it was counterintuitive to go back and try to settle scores,” Mr. Biden said. But Mr. Trump did not say how he would handle his threats of retribution.
“He didn’t reinforce it; he just basically listened,” Mr. Biden said.
Since late last year, Mr. Biden’s staff has considered what the pardons might look like were Mr. Biden to pursue them, including how to extend executive clemency to a list of current and former government officials for any possible crimes over a period of years.
Mr. Trump told NBC recently that he would like to jail members of the congressional panel that investigated the Jan. 6 attack. Ms. Cheney served on the panel. At least two of its other members, Senator Adam Schiff, a Democrat from California, and Adam Kinzinger, the former Republican representative, have said they do not want pardons, arguing that accepting one would falsely suggest that they had committed crimes.
“It would be the wrong precedent to set,” Mr. Schiff told CNN earlier this week. “I don’t want to see each president hereafter on their way out the door giving out a broad category of pardons.”

So basically, Joe is saying they are guilty of something thus the need for a pardon.

Average Americans want to know exactly what they did that Joe wants to pardon them for.

Let the prosecutions begin.
 
There is nothing to answer for. There is no question any of them would not want to answer. There is no genuine crime remotely alluded to by any of the people Trump has targeted. He simply wants to go after people who he considers to be enemies.

You’re an idiot.
Careful he’ll call you a Nazi.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT