OK, you've confused me. I think sometimes Iowa plays teams that are better than Iowa. When those games go down to the wire, I think obviously Iowa has over-achieved.....or the opponent has under-achieved, or a combination of both. You apparently think that the normal, expectable result is for Iowa to win every game it plays. I disagree.
This isn't just an Iowa thing. In football this year, for example, I thought ISU over-achieved to play Okie State down to the wire. ISU lost a close game. The fact that it could/should have won, except for a mistake or two at the end, doesn't mean the team didn't over-achieve in order to put itself in that position.
You mean because I presented facts for discussion, but didn't agree with some of the conclusions others had regarding those facts? Hilarious. I also believe children shouldn't be driving cars or getting jobs as Doctors, but I do believe in a free country. Are those contrary statements?
Yesterday I had a guy who didn't have the capacity to understand the difference between an ESPN evaluation score and an ESPN ranking arguing with me over who Iowa's best recruits have been, or are going to be.
What do you want Kurt? I have only so much patience with idiots.
Thanks for the reply. I'm gonna take your word for it that's the right guy!Tyler Griffey